论《民法总则》第10条中的习惯——以“顶盆过继案”切入
发布时间：2018-12-30 16:26
【摘要】：《民法总则》第10条是法官找法规范,而非造法规范;是关于法的渊源的规定,而非法的适用的规定。第10条所规定的"习惯"意指"习惯法",而现行法规定的各种习惯仅是"事实上习惯"。"事实上习惯"本质上是人的行为方式,还需具备"法的确信",才能成为习惯法。法的确信是一定区域社会公众对于习惯具有法效力的主观意识。德国、瑞士和我国台湾地区普遍出现了习惯法空洞化现象,从而采取了以判例发展习惯法的新路径。我国最高法院指导案例与这一路径的基本精神相符,可采纳以最高法院指导案例发展习惯法的做法,文章以"顶盆过继案"为例演示了该路径的具体操作。
[Abstract]:Article 10 of the General principles of Civil Law is the rule of the judge seeking law, not the norm of making the law; it is the regulation of the origin of law, but the provision of illegal application. The term "custom" provided for in article 10 means "customary law", while the conventions provided for in current law are only "de facto customs". " As a matter of fact, habit is essentially a way of human behavior, and must have the assurance of law in order to become customary law. The conviction of law is the subjective consciousness of the public in certain region that the custom has the effect of law. In Germany, Switzerland and Taiwan, the phenomenon of void of customary law appears generally, and a new way of developing customary law by case law is taken. The guiding case of our country's Supreme Court is in accordance with the basic spirit of this path, and we can adopt the practice of using the Supreme Court to guide the case to develop customary law. This paper demonstrates the concrete operation of this path with the example of the case of "the adoption of the top basin".
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学凯原法学院;上海大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家哲学社会科学重点基金项目“程序性权利理论的提出与证成研究”(项目号16AFX003) 中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究课题青年调研项目“不当得利在民法典中的定位:基于不当得利审判的实证研究(1986-2016)”(项目号CLS(2016)Y13) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目“提升公共服务效能的公民程序性参与研究”(项目号16YJC810013)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D923.1
，
本文编号：2395823
[Abstract]:Article 10 of the General principles of Civil Law is the rule of the judge seeking law, not the norm of making the law; it is the regulation of the origin of law, but the provision of illegal application. The term "custom" provided for in article 10 means "customary law", while the conventions provided for in current law are only "de facto customs". " As a matter of fact, habit is essentially a way of human behavior, and must have the assurance of law in order to become customary law. The conviction of law is the subjective consciousness of the public in certain region that the custom has the effect of law. In Germany, Switzerland and Taiwan, the phenomenon of void of customary law appears generally, and a new way of developing customary law by case law is taken. The guiding case of our country's Supreme Court is in accordance with the basic spirit of this path, and we can adopt the practice of using the Supreme Court to guide the case to develop customary law. This paper demonstrates the concrete operation of this path with the example of the case of "the adoption of the top basin".
【作者单位】： 上海交通大学凯原法学院;上海大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家哲学社会科学重点基金项目“程序性权利理论的提出与证成研究”(项目号16AFX003) 中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究课题青年调研项目“不当得利在民法典中的定位:基于不当得利审判的实证研究(1986-2016)”(项目号CLS(2016)Y13) 教育部人文社会科学基金项目“提升公共服务效能的公民程序性参与研究”(项目号16YJC810013)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D923.1
，
本文编号：2395823
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2395823.html
