当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

微博侵犯人格权问题研究

发布时间:2019-03-19 07:26
【摘要】:微型博客简称微博,它是为用户提供分享信息、获取信息服务的社交媒介,由于微博上的转发、评论、收藏、点赞等功能使微博的信息传播速度超越于其他媒介。近年来更多用户选择微博这一新颖媒介来传递信息、读取信息,它甚至成为了很多人生活中不可缺少的一部分。而微博上的侵权事件也时有发生,据调查在微博中的侵权大多数为人格权侵权,且比其他环境中的侵权更易发生、更加复杂。当我们随心所欲的在微博上发布信息、评论人或事时可能就会侵犯他人的人格权,加之微博惊人的转发量和传播速度、受众性广等特点使这种侵权在微博中扩大,后果也更加严重。微博是实现言论自由权的最佳场所,却也是侵权发生的最频繁场所。如果对微博环境中的言论自由不加以限制,只会造成一部分人享有自由大部分人丧失人格权的后果发生,微博环境将变得更加混乱不堪。而如今我国在网络方面的立法、司法还不够完善,对于微博这种新兴媒介中发生的侵权更是没有具体的法律依据。目前对于微博侵权的案件只能参照宪法、刑法、民法通则或侵权法中的个别条例来判决,而这些法律中对于人格权没有确切的规定,有必要在人格权法之中加上网络侵权的规定。对于微博这类网络环境的规制需要从立法、行政法、司法等各方面做出具体规定,使我们的网络侵权立法体系更加完善。除了法律法规方面的措施,还需要微博行业内签订行业协议实现自我管理、自我约束的办法,建立起行业自律制度。在微博用户管理方面,文中提倡实行微博后台实名制,用实名注册的办法管理好微博用户,维护用户的权益。除此之外还应提高我国的国民上网素质,从根本上解决微博侵权的法律问题。 本文以微博侵犯人格权这一侵权问题为视角,在正文中首先介绍了微博的来历,在中国的发展,其次分析出微博、微博人格权及微博侵权的概念和特点。通过介绍微博侵犯人格权的基本概念、特点从而引起大家对微博侵犯人格权的重视。接着分析了微博侵犯人格权的构成要素和责任承担问题,对此类侵权案件的构成做了详细的介绍。文章第四部分总结了我国关于微博侵犯人格权的立法、司法现状从而得出了我国在此类侵权问题方面的欠缺与不足。通过最后介绍国外的立法、司法经验给我国的启发及凭借多方调查了解提出了对我国微博侵犯人格权法律规制方面的一些个人建议。
[Abstract]:Micro blog for short Weibo, it is to provide users with information sharing, access to information services of social media, Weibo due to the forwarding, comments, collections, likes and other functions, Weibo's information dissemination speed beyond other media. In recent years, more and more users choose Weibo as a novel medium to transmit information and read information. It has even become an indispensable part of many people's lives. Weibo also happens frequently, according to the investigation of Weibo in most of the infringement of personality rights, and more prone to occur than other environment infringement, more complex. When we publish information on Weibo at will and comment on people or things, we may infringe on the personal rights of others, plus Weibo's amazing volume of re-distribution and speed of transmission, and the wide audience, and so on, so that the infringement of this kind of infringement is expanded in Weibo. The consequences are even more serious. Weibo is the best place to realize the right to freedom of expression, but it is also the most frequent place where infringement occurs. If the freedom of speech in Weibo's environment is not restricted, the Weibo environment will become even more chaotic if only some people enjoy freedom and most people lose their right to personality. At present, the legislation of network in our country is not perfect enough, and there is no concrete legal basis for the infringement of Weibo as a new medium. At present, Weibo's infringement cases can only be judged by reference to the Constitution, criminal law, general principles of civil law or individual regulations in the tort law, but there is no definite provision in these laws for the right of personality. It is necessary to add the provisions of network infringement in the law of personality. The regulation of this kind of network environment such as Weibo needs to make specific regulations from the aspects of legislation, administrative law, judicature and so on, so as to make our legislation system of network tort more perfect. In addition to the measures of laws and regulations, it is also necessary for Weibo to sign trade agreements to achieve self-management and self-restraint, and to establish a self-discipline system in the industry. In the aspect of Weibo's user management, the article advocates the implementation of Weibo backstage real-name system, the method of real-name registration to manage Weibo users, and safeguard the rights and interests of users. In addition, we should improve our national quality of Internet access and fundamentally solve the legal problems of Weibo's infringement. From the perspective of Weibo's infringement of personality right, this paper first introduces Weibo's origin and development in China, and then analyzes the concepts and characteristics of Weibo, Weibo and Weibo tort. By introducing the basic concept of Weibo's violation of the right of personality, the characteristics of the violation of the right of personality caused by Weibo attention to the violation of the right to personality. Then it analyzes the constituent elements and liability of Weibo's infringement of personality right, and makes a detailed introduction to the constitution of this kind of infringement case. The fourth part of the article summarizes the legislation of Weibo's infringement of personality right, and the judicial situation, so as to draw a conclusion of the deficiency and deficiency of this kind of infringement in our country. Finally, through introducing foreign legislation and judicial experience, the author puts forward some personal suggestions on the legal regulation of Weibo's violation of personality right in our country by virtue of multi-party investigation and understanding.
【学位授予单位】:云南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王靖华;;美国互联网管制的三个标准[J];当代传播;2008年03期

2 李小兵;丁广宇;;美国有关网络规则的最新发展与思考[J];法律适用;2009年05期

3 胡媛;;网上舆论为何不理智——访中国社科院网络与数字传媒研究室主任闵大洪教授[J];法律与生活;2006年13期

4 王利明;;论网络环境下人格权的保护[J];中国地质大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期

5 冯姣;;禁止庭审微博直播与审判公开关系之探析[J];法治研究;2013年08期

6 袁锋;;BBS服务运营商的侵权责任研究 以现行中国司法实践为例证[J];电子知识产权;2013年08期

7 刘淑珍;;试论侵权损害的归责原则[J];法学研究;1984年04期

8 韩大元;因特网时代的宪法学研究新课题[J];环球法律评论;2001年01期

9 魏永征;;对网上言论自由法律边界的有益探索——评“微博第一案”两审判决[J];新闻记者;2011年11期

10 张雨林;;博客实名吹皱一池春水[J];中国计算机用户;2006年43期



本文编号:2443309

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2443309.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户df9ae***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com