卡-梅框架下我国物权保护规则的配置研究

发布时间：2018-01-07 20:21

本文关键词：卡-梅框架下我国物权保护规则的配置研究　出处：《政法论丛》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：作为法经济学分析方法,卡-梅框架打破了传统不同法律部门间的樊篱,转而以行为结果模式,将物权的法律保护方式类型化为财产规则、责任规则和禁易规则,清晰展现出三种规则在制度效率上的功能。我国现行物权保护立法存在行为规则与结果规则配置失衡的问题,使制度效率不彰。基于卡-梅框架的分析,《民法典》物权编立法应在行为规则与结果规则之间达到平衡,确立同一物权违法行为的公法责任与私法责任,明确财产规则和禁易规则的行为结果,规定责任规则的适用条件,增设惩罚性责任规则,赋予禁易规则以结果性规定,从而提升物权保护规则的整体效率。
[Abstract]:As a legal and economic analysis method, Ca-Mei framework breaks down the traditional barriers between different legal departments, and turns the legal protection mode of real right into property rules by the mode of behavior outcome. The rules of liability and the rules of prohibition clearly show the functions of the three rules in the efficiency of the system. There exists the imbalance between the rules of conduct and the rules of result in the current legislation of real right protection in our country. Based on the analysis of Ca-Mei frame, the legislation of property rights should balance the rules of conduct and the rules of result, and establish the responsibility of public law and private law of the same illegal act of real right. In order to improve the overall efficiency of the rules of real right protection, it is clear that the behavior result of the property rules and the rules of prohibition are clear, the applicable conditions of the rules of liability are stipulated, the rules of punitive liability are added, and the rules of prohibition are provided with the rules of result.
【作者单位】：辽宁大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“农村发展与农民财产权保护制度研究”(11BFX066)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.2
【正文快照】： 我国现行立法通过不同部门法以多种方式配置物权保护规则,并逐步形成了相对健全的物权保护法律体系。但不同保护方式之间既内生冲突与竞合,又存在规则漏洞或空白,当个案处理存在不同价值取向时,往往发生法律适用的争议,以及难以调和的学术争论。(1)因此,有必要打破不同法律部

【相似文献】