最小防范成本：法理的经济分析

发布时间：2018-03-07 21:42

本文选题：最小防范成本　切入点：局限　出处：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着社会的发展,教义法学面对一些新生事物显得捉襟见肘。首先,面对一些法律没有明文规定的问题,教义法学没有办法解决。其次,对于一些问题教义法学虽然做出了规定,但是法律适用的情形和实际情况并不完全相符,按照教义法学进行判决与公众直觉不符。本文希望通过介绍法律经济学中一个常见的原则最小防范成本,为解决现行法律存在的不足,提供一些帮助。本文中,最小防范成本原则是指,对于意外或损失,谁能够以最小的成本加以预防,就由谁承担相应的预防责任。本文的创新点之处有三点。首先本文创新性的将经济学常用的时间轴工具引入法学,并以此为线索梳理最小防范成本相关文献。按照时间轴的视角检视相关文献,有效弥补了现存文献对最小防范成本原则认识的不足。本文明确指出,最小防范成本人不仅仅只有一个。并且在证据明晰的情况下,总可以找到相应时点上的最小防范成本人。其次,本文将最小防范成本原则和其他法律原则(包括汉达公式、最后明显机会、最小成本、自寻滋扰)进行比较。笔者认为,不同情况适用不同法律原则,实际上是出于成本收益的考虑。不同的法律原则实际上用不同的语言表达相同的经济学逻辑。最后,本文用最小防范成本原则分析发生在中国大陆的司法案例,弥补大陆法系对普通法系下法律原则认识的不足。本文分析过程中,采用法学视角和法经济学视角两个角度进行分析,两相对比,更能体现出法律经济学分析的优势。笔者希望,籍由此文,能为法律经济学在中国大陆的发展添些微末之力。
[Abstract]:With the development of the society, the dogmatic jurisprudence is overstretched in the face of some new things. First, in the face of some problems which are not expressly prescribed by the law, the doctrinal jurisprudence has no way to solve. Secondly, Although there are provisions in the dogmatic jurisprudence of some problems, the situation in which the law is applied is not entirely consistent with the actual situation. Judging according to the dogmatic jurisprudence is not in accordance with the public intuition. This paper hopes to provide some help to solve the shortcomings of the current law by introducing a common principle in law and economics to minimize the cost of prevention. The principle of minimum precautionary costs refers to who can prevent accidents or losses at the lowest possible cost, There are three innovations in this paper. Firstly, this paper innovatively introduces the time-axis tools commonly used in economics into law. According to the view of time axis, it can effectively make up for the deficiency of the existing literature on the principle of minimum precautionary cost. In the case of clear evidence, we can always find the minimum precaution at the corresponding point in time. Secondly, this paper puts the minimum precautionary cost principle and other legal principles (including the Handa formula). Finally, the obvious opportunity, the minimum cost, the self-seeking nuisance) are compared. The author believes that different legal principles apply to different situations. Different legal principles actually express the same economic logic in different languages. Finally, this paper uses the principle of minimum precaution cost to analyze the judicial cases that occur in mainland China. In the course of the analysis, the author uses the angle of law and the angle of law and economics to make up for the deficiency of the understanding of the legal principle under the common law system in the civil law system. The author hopes that this paper can add some little power to the development of legal economics in mainland China.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D90

【参考文献】