中国申请国际排放控制区的成本研究（英文）

发布时间：2020-12-05 02:52

　　为控制船舶大气污染,改善环境空气质量,2015年中国首次设立了珠三角、长三角、环渤海(京津冀)水域船舶排放控制区。为满足海洋环境保护委员会第70次会议中有关更严格的船舶排放控制的要求,中国拟于2030年设立经国际海事组织审议通过的国际排放控制区。本文对现有的NOx及SOx减排技术进行探讨,对中国设立国际排放控制区给其航运业带来的减排成本进行分析。基于文献调研及数据分析,文章分别计算了使用低硫燃油、废气清洗系统(Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems, EGCS)、选择性催化还原技术(Selective Catalytic Reduction, SCR)、废气循环技术(Exhaust Gas Recirculation, EGR)四种传统除氮除硫技术的减排成本。结果表明,使用低硫燃油为硫减排的最佳技术方案,安装SCR为氮减排的最佳技术方案。除了传统的减排技术,本文还计算了使用岸电系统及LNG两种绿色能源的减排成本。计算数据显示,六种减排方案的减排成本分别为28.66亿, 3.24亿,10.71亿, 4.02亿, 2.32亿和3.4亿美元。 

【文章来源】：Journal of Resources and Ecology. 2020年04期 第388-393页

【文章页数】：6 页

【文章目录】：
1 Introduction
2 Brief comparison of emission reduction alternatives
    2.1 Switching to low-sulphur fuel
    2.2 Installing exhaust gas cleaning systems
    2.3 Installing selective catalytic reduction system
    2.4 Installing exhaust gas recirculation system
    2.5 Installing shore power application
    2.6 Liquefied natural gas ships
3 Cost estimates of emission reduction alternatives
    3.1 Cost of switching to low-sulphur fuel
    3.2 The cost of exhaust gas cleaning systems
    3.3 The cost of selective catalytic reduction systems
    3.4 The cost of exhaust gas recirculation systems
    3.5 The cost of installing shore power application
4 Results and discussion
    4.1 The cost of Sulphur Oxides abatement
        4.1.1 The cost of switching to low-sulphur fuel
        4.1.2 The cost of installing an exhaust gas recirculation system
    4.2 The cost of Nitrogen Oxide abatement
        4.2.1 The cost of installing selective catalytic reduction systems
        4.2.2 The cost of installing exhaust gas recirculation systems
    4.3 The cost for LNG vessels
    4.4 The cost for installing shore power facilities
5 Conclusions



本文编号：2898731