制度化酬赏机制与新学术主义

发布时间：2018-01-14 23:21

本文关键词：制度化酬赏机制与新学术主义　出处：《清华大学教育研究》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在新自由主义的推波助澜下,公共管理主义被视为诊治公部门效能不彰的万灵丹,因为其效能要求契合集体利益之社会期望,因而取得市民社会的支持,继而转变为强力的社会论述,以驱动政府进行高等教育革新。然而,批评者却认为,此种表现力思维强化大学的科层性,并削弱教师的专业自主权,其商业逻辑使大学文化转向功利主义。本文指出,这些批评陷落于结构主义的预设立场,致使未能深究为何公共管理主义能如此兴盛。绩效主义开启学术取向的结构脉络,此种脉络的制度化酬赏原则强化个人化的成就动机,进而汇流成集体化的学术主义,因而削弱科层体制中私心与权威结合的保守文化,继而提升组织效能。此种新学术主义彰显出,公共管理主义的效能法则赢得大学内部的支持,因而强化其社会论述的影响力。
[Abstract]:Fuelled by neoliberalism, public managementism is regarded as a panacea for the ineffective diagnosis and treatment of the public sector, because its effectiveness requires social expectations that are in line with the collective interests, and thus obtains the support of the civil society. In turn, it turns into a strong social discourse that drives the government to innovate in higher education. However, critics argue that this expressive thinking reinforces the academic hierarchy of universities and weakens teachers' professional autonomy. The commercial logic makes the university culture turn to utilitarianism. This paper points out that these criticisms fall in the presupposition of structuralism. Performance doctrine opens the structural context of academic orientation, such a context of institutionalized reward principle to strengthen the individual achievement motivation. Then converging into collectivized academism, thus weakening the conservative culture of combination of self-interest and authority in the system of science and order, and then improving the organizational effectiveness. The efficiency law of public management gains support from within the university, thus strengthening the influence of its social discourse.
【作者单位】：郑州大学教育学系;
【分类号】：G647
【正文快照】： 一、前言执行凯恩斯主义的国家在20世纪60年代逐渐面临财政包袱的压力,因为其大政府思维的社会福利政策累积可观的国家债务,70年代初期的石油危机不但加剧此种财政危机,更击垮许多社会大众对此种路线的信心。这种情境提供新自由主义扩张地盘的空间,并在80年代初期取得政治领域

【相似文献】