欠发达地区地方政府绩效评估研究

发布时间：2018-05-26 09:08

本文选题：欠发达地区 + 地方政府　；参考：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：自20世纪60年代以来，政府绩效评估在西方发达国家俨然是一股不可抵挡的时尚潮流，各国纷纷将这种已经在企业管理中发挥重要作用的方式引进政府部门工作评估与该进，试图扭转本国政府备受诟病的效率低下、成本激增、服务质量差等问题。经过数十年的实践，各国政府充分验证了其在提高政府效能，监控政府执法、提升政府服务水平、转变政府职能、促进“阳光行政”等方面的不容置疑的功能。尤其是英国、美国、澳大利亚等率先举起政府绩效评估大旗的国家，在长期的实践中，不断调整与改变实际操作中存在的非规范行为，总结经验，形成了各国相对成熟的绩效评估模式，成为后入国家学习的典范。对我国而言，政府绩效评估无论是在理论上还是在实践上都远远落后于发达国家，欠发达地区尤甚，从已经形成的地方政府绩效评估模式来看，取得了一定成就，但还存在更多的问题，迫切需要理论先行，为实践“指路”。同时，作为现代公共管理研究的一个前沿课题，对欠发达地区政府绩效评估的研究，势必推进本级政府行政管理体制改革，，优化政府工作流程，促成“服务性政府”的建立。本文按照提出问题、分析问题、解决问题的逻辑，将全文分为五个部分：第一部分主要是对欠发达地区政府绩效评估学术界当前研究的总体情况进行综述；第二部分是就研究欠发达地区政府绩效评估的理论基础如新公共服务理论、治理理论、科学发展观等做简要介绍，最后是对文中将要涉及的欠发达、地方政府、绩效评估等主要名词进行解释与界定，便于规范研究；第三部分则对当前我国欠发达地区在政府绩效评估实践中的几种模式进行介绍并分析，重点对其在推行过程中存在的意识观念落后，开放性程度低，处于发展的初级阶段、指标体系缺乏科学性、应用机制缺失等问题作了探讨；第四部分是在承接第三部分的基础上，重点剖析阻碍我国欠发达地区政府绩效评估进一步发展的因素，透视出意识障碍、结构障碍、管理障碍、评估障碍等问题。第五部分是本文的重点，针对欠发达地区政府绩效评估中存在的障碍性因素，作者试图从更新政府服务理念、培养专业人才、建立多元化评估主体、科学设置评估指标、完善沟通反馈渠道、形成法律保障、注重评估结果的应用等一整套相互协调的解决实施方案。
[Abstract]:Since the 1960s, government performance evaluation has been an irresistible fashion trend in the western developed countries. Many countries have introduced this way, which has played an important role in enterprise management, into the work evaluation of government departments. Trying to reverse the government's much-criticized inefficiencies, soaring costs and poor service quality. After decades of practice, the governments of various countries have fully verified their indisputable functions in improving the efficiency of the government, monitoring the law enforcement of the government, improving the level of government services, transforming the functions of the government, and promoting the "sunshine administration". In particular, the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia and other countries that have taken the lead in raising the flag of government performance evaluation have constantly adjusted and changed the non-standard behavior existing in the actual operation in their long-term practice, and summed up their experiences. It has formed a relatively mature performance evaluation model and become a model for learning from the country. For our country, the government performance evaluation is far behind the developed countries in theory and practice, especially in the less developed areas. From the view of the local government performance evaluation model, it has made some achievements. But there are still more problems, the urgent need for theory first, for practice, "show the way." At the same time, as a forward subject of modern public management research, the research on government performance evaluation in underdeveloped areas is bound to promote the reform of government administration system at the corresponding level, optimize government work flow, and promote the establishment of "service government". According to the logic of problem raising, problem analysis and problem solving, the thesis is divided into five parts: The first part is a summary of the current research in the academic circles of government performance evaluation in underdeveloped areas. The second part is a brief introduction to the theoretical basis of government performance evaluation in underdeveloped areas, such as new public service theory, governance theory, scientific development view, etc. The main terms, such as performance evaluation, are interpreted and defined to facilitate normative research; The third part introduces and analyzes several models in the practice of government performance evaluation in the underdeveloped areas of our country, focusing on the backward consciousness, low openness and the initial stage of development in the process of implementation. The lack of scientific index system and lack of application mechanism are discussed. On the basis of the third part, the fourth part mainly analyzes the factors hindering the further development of government performance evaluation in underdeveloped areas of our country, and points out the obstacles of consciousness, structure, management, evaluation and so on. The fifth part is the focal point of this paper, aiming at the obstacle factors in the evaluation of government performance in underdeveloped areas, the author tries to update the concept of government service, train professional talents, establish a pluralistic evaluation subject, and scientifically set up the evaluation index. Improve the channel of communication and feedback, form legal guarantee, pay attention to the application of evaluation results, etc.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D625

【参考文献】