大数据时代的刑事领域被遗忘权
发布时间：2019-03-14 20:42
【摘要】：大数据时代的到来既带来便利也带来信息失控的风险,从而必然产生对被遗忘权的需求,刑事领域也同样存在被遗忘权的适用空间。然而刑事领域的被遗忘权可能与大数据时代的信息开放、新闻自由、犯罪控制等法益产生冲突,面对冲突不同国家从立法到司法层面可能作出不同的选择。欧盟《一般数据保护条例》第17条规定了被遗忘权的适用情形及其限制条件,可以对刑事领域被遗忘权的边界确立提供参考。通过"申请+审查"的被遗忘权行使模式,可以解决其与公共安全、司法公正、人权保护等的矛盾。我国目前在司法中尚未承认被遗忘权,但刑事立法中已有被遗忘权的某些原始样态,可以在此基础上正式确立刑事领域被遗忘权并审慎地拓展其适用范围。
[Abstract]:The arrival of the great data age brings convenience to the risk of information loss, so it is necessary to have the right to be forgotten, and the application space of the right to be left in the criminal field is also the same. However, the right to be forgotten in the criminal field may conflict with the information of the large data age, the freedom of the press, the crime control, and so on, and the different countries in the face of the conflict may make different choices from the legislation to the judicial level. The application of the right to be forgotten and its limitations are set out in the European Union for the Protection of the General Data Protection Act, which provides a reference to the establishment of the boundaries of the right to be forgotten in the criminal sphere. Through the "Application + Review" 's left-to-right exercise mode, it can solve the contradiction with public safety, judicial justice, human rights protection and so on. In our country, we have not yet recognized the right to be forgotten in the administration of justice, but some of the original states of the right to be forgotten in the criminal legislation can be formally established in the criminal area, and the scope of application should be extended prudently.
【作者单位】： 北京外国语大学法学院;
【基金】：北京市社会科学基金项目“刑事司法领域被遗忘权研究”,项目编号:16FXC034
【分类号】：D925.2
本文编号：2440352
[Abstract]:The arrival of the great data age brings convenience to the risk of information loss, so it is necessary to have the right to be forgotten, and the application space of the right to be left in the criminal field is also the same. However, the right to be forgotten in the criminal field may conflict with the information of the large data age, the freedom of the press, the crime control, and so on, and the different countries in the face of the conflict may make different choices from the legislation to the judicial level. The application of the right to be forgotten and its limitations are set out in the European Union for the Protection of the General Data Protection Act, which provides a reference to the establishment of the boundaries of the right to be forgotten in the criminal sphere. Through the "Application + Review" 's left-to-right exercise mode, it can solve the contradiction with public safety, judicial justice, human rights protection and so on. In our country, we have not yet recognized the right to be forgotten in the administration of justice, but some of the original states of the right to be forgotten in the criminal legislation can be formally established in the criminal area, and the scope of application should be extended prudently.
【作者单位】： 北京外国语大学法学院;
【基金】：北京市社会科学基金项目“刑事司法领域被遗忘权研究”,项目编号:16FXC034
【分类号】：D925.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 李辉;;刑事领域的亲属作证特免权制度研究[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年12期
2 吕吉海;;谈刑事领域的公民参与——透析王会洲案件始末[J];新疆警官高等专科学校学报;2008年04期
3 刘明辉;;刑事领域无精神损害赔偿的弊端——从一起奸淫幼女案谈起[J];妇女研究论丛;2013年04期
4 吕吉海;;从王会洲案看刑事领域中公民参与的方式及法律保护[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2008年06期
5 胡承武;;论刑事领域中的错案追究制对司法行为的影响及其对策[J];长江大学学报(社会科学版);2007年05期
6 刘传伟;;浅议刑事领域再审检察建议[J];法制与社会;2012年14期
7 闫真;;论刑事领域的亲属拒证权[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年07期
8 王圆圆;;关于我国刑事领域中精神损害赔偿的研究[J];四川经济管理学院学报;2007年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 马洪锁;在刑事领域中对司法精神病学若干问题的研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
2 方健;论刑事领域中的容隐制度[D];华东政法大学;2011年
，本文编号：2440352
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/2440352.html
