论我国公益类国有企业的界定及治理模式

发布时间：2018-01-22 23:37

本文关键词： 公益类国有企业公益性界定规制治理模式　出处：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文分四个部分探讨了我国公益类国有企业的界定及治理模式的问题。第一部分:我国公益类国有企业的界定。该部分内容首先从我国国有企业概念出发,通过对相关观点的引述,引出公益类国有企业的概念。同时,结合公益类国有企业改革的政策依据,对我国公益类国有企业的概念进行梳理;其次,通过对关于公益类国有企业的政策依据及观点梳理,归纳出公益类国有企业的基本特征;再次,从行业界定入手,比照域外国有企业所属行业,考察国内地方国有企业分类做法,尝试对我国公益类国有企业所属行业进行具体罗列举例。第二部分:我国对公益类国有企业治理的实践及存在的问题。该部分内容从检视我国现行立法出发,提出我国现行关于国有企业的立法并没有从功能上进行分类规制的现状及其弊害。并进而从理论界有关功能区分的探讨成果,政策层面的思路明确及实务需求,域外成功实践的角度出发,得出区分规制公益类国有企业与非公益类国有企业已势在必行的结论。第三部分:域外法的经验及对我国的借鉴。笔者在该部分内容中选取了具有代表性的大陆法系的法国、德国、日本、韩国和英美法系的美国五个国家,整理了该五个国家关于国有企业的法律规制和治理模式现状,并归纳出共性以供我国公益类国有企业治理借鉴之用。第四部分:我国公益类国有企业治理模式的思考。此部分内容是笔者在本文中重点探讨的内容。笔者从现有政策对公益类国有企业治理模式的要求入手,结合在第三部分中提出的现存弊害逐一给出了相应的细化建议,尤其着重关于董事会、监事会、经理层的组成,相互之间的独立性,与其他组织机构之间的关系,以及高管的选聘、激励,有针对性的绩效考核体系的建立等治理模式核心问题的探讨。基于此,再进而对公益类国有企业的治理模式与普通的公司企业治理模式的区别进行了概括论述。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the definition and governance model of public interest state-owned enterprises in China in four parts. The first part: the definition of public welfare state-owned enterprises. This part begins with the concept of state-owned enterprises in China. By quoting the relevant viewpoints, the concept of public interest state-owned enterprises is introduced. At the same time, combining with the policy basis of the reform of public welfare state-owned enterprises, the concept of public welfare state-owned enterprises in our country is combed. Secondly, the basic characteristics of public interest state-owned enterprises are summarized by combing the policy basis and viewpoint of public interest state-owned enterprises. Thirdly, starting with the definition of the industry, comparing with the industries belonging to the foreign state-owned enterprises, this paper investigates the classification practices of the local state-owned enterprises in China. The second part: the practice and existing problems of the governance of public interest state-owned enterprises in China. This part of the content from the view of the current legislation of our country. This paper points out that the current legislation on state-owned enterprises in China has not functionally regulated the status quo and harm of classification, and then from the theoretical circles on the functional division of the research results, the policy level of thinking and practical needs. From the perspective of successful practice abroad. Draw the conclusion that it is imperative to distinguish the regulation and regulation of state-owned enterprises of public interest and non-public enterprises. Part three:. The experience of the extraterritorial law and its reference to our country. In this part, the author chooses the representative civil law system France. Germany, Japan, South Korea and the United States, Anglo-American legal system of five countries, collate the legal regulation and governance of state-owned enterprises in these five countries. And generality is summed up to be used for reference in the governance of public interest state-owned enterprises in China. Part 4th:. This part is the focus of the discussion in this paper. The author starts with the requirements of the existing policies on the governance model of public interest state-owned enterprises. Combined with the existing harm in the third part of the proposed one by one to give the corresponding detailed recommendations, especially on the board of directors, board of supervisors, the composition of managers, the independence of each other. The relationship with other organizations, as well as the selection and appointment of senior executives, incentives, the establishment of targeted performance appraisal system and other governance model core issues. Based on this. Then, the difference between the public enterprise governance model and the common corporate governance model is discussed.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F276.1;F271

【参考文献】