STS科学民主化争论的还原与分析

发布时间：2018-04-12 17:16

  本文选题：STS + 科学民主化　； 参考：《科学学研究》2016年08期

【摘要】：柯林斯和埃文斯的"科学的社会研究的第三波理论"发表后,引起了贾撒诺夫和温尼关于科学民主化问题的激烈反响,科学技术论(STS)研究陷入了关于科学决策的公众参与限度的争论当中。争论双方着重关注于科学本身,未充分认识到民主的地方性,尤其是不同民主理念背后的哲学基础,在民主化方面过于草率地沿袭了现成的民主理念。因此,争论的本质是民主化的理由是什么以及何种民主理念适用于科学的民主化。对这场争论的民主理念和价值承诺的还原,将促进对科学民主化理论基础的理解。
[Abstract]:The publication of Collins and Evans'"the third Wave Theory of Scientific Social Research" has aroused a heated response from Jassanov and Winnie on the democratization of science.STS (Science and Technology Theory) Research has fallen into a debate about the limits of public participation in scientific decision-making.Both sides pay more attention to the science itself, fail to fully realize the local democracy, especially the philosophical foundation behind different democratic ideas, and blindly follow the ready-made democratic ideas in the aspect of democratization.The essence of the debate, therefore, is what the rationale for democratization is and what democratic ideas apply to the democratization of science.The restoration of the democratic concept and value commitment of this controversy will promote the understanding of the theoretical basis of scientific democratization.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院大学人文学院;
【分类号】：G301
，

本文编号：1740680