fiscal decentralization pollutant discharge expenditure dece

  本文关键词：财政分权对中国环境污染影响程度的实证分析，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

财政分权对中国环境污染影响程度的实证分析

An Empirical Analysis on the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Environmental Pollution in China

[1] [2]

XUE Gang, PANG Xiao-zhen （1. School of Public Finance and Taxation, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan Hubei 430073, China; 2. Research Center of Hubei Finance

[1]中南财经政法大学财政税务学院,湖北武汉430073; [2]湖北财政与发展研究中心,湖北武汉430073

文章摘要：财政分权体现了中央政府和地方政府间的财政权力分配关系。它可以通过支出分权度和收入分权度两个指标进行衡量。从理论上分析，大多数研究结论都认为财政分权与污染量排放存在负激励，但是缺乏相应的实证研究。本文利用1998年到2009年的省级面板数据。对中国财政分权与污染物排放规模之间的荚系进行了实证分析。本文选取工业废气排放量、工业固体凌弃物排放量、工业废水排放量和二氧化硫排放量作为衡量污染物排放规模的指标，选择支出分权度与收入分权度作为解释变量，，选择人均GDP、人口密度、城市化水平、外商投资总额、工业化水平作为控制变量。本文还将所有省份按照地理位置划分为东部和中西部两组进行稳健性检验。研究结果表明：以支出分权度衡量的财政分权指标与污染物排放规模负相关，且实证结果具有稳健性。以收入分权度衡量的财政分权指标与污染物排放规模的关系从实证的角度来讲不确定。

Abstr：Fiscal decentralization reflects the distribution financial power between the central government and local government. It can be measured through the two indicators which are expenditure decentralization and revenue decentralization. From the theoretical analysis, most studies have concluded that there is a negative incentive between the fiscal decentralization and the amount of pollutant discharge, but lacks the empirical research. Utilizing the provincial panel data from 1998 to 2009, this paper carried on the empirical analysis about the relationship between China＇ s fiscal decentralization and the scale of pollutant discharge. The industrial waste gas discharge amount, industrial solid wastes discharge amount, industrial waste water discharge amount and sulfur dioxide discharge amount were selected as the indicators to measure the scale of pollutant discharge in the paper. The paper selected the expenditure decentralization degree and revenue decentralization degree as explanatory variables, and selected the per capita GDP, population density, urbanization level, total foreign investment, and the industrialization level as control variables. The paper divided all provinces into two groups（ east and midwest） in accordance with their geographic location to carry out robustness test. The results showed that the fiscal decentralization indicator which was measured by the expenditure decentralization degree was negatively related to the scale of pollutant discharge. And the empirical results were of robustness. The relationship between the fscal decentralization indicator which was measured by revenue decentralization degree and the scale of pollutant discharge was uncertain from the empirical point.

文章关键词：

Keyword：:fiscal decentralization pollutant discharge expenditure decentralization degree revenue decentralization degree

相关文章：

[1] 我国个人所得税再分配效应及累进性的实证分析   《财贸经济》  2011年03期
[2] 分税制下税务稽查影响因素研究   《财贸经济》  2011年03期
[3] 税收风险管理与银行风险管理的比较分析及其启示   《财经理论与实践》  2011年02期
[4] 流转税和所得税的产业结构调整效应分析   《财经理论与实践》  2011年02期
[5] 云南省矿产资源有偿使用的税费现状   《企业导报：购房指南》  2011年03期
[6] 刍议分税制改革与中国地方政府债务风险之关系   《现代财经：天津财经学院学报》  2011年04期
[7] 财政分权、地方财政赤字与土地财政——来自中部欠发达地区J省的经验证据   《中南财经政法大学学报》  2012年01期

课题项目：湖北省社会科学“十一五”规划基金项目“湖北省县乡财政体制改革研究”（编号：2010073）;武汉市社会科学基金项目“《武汉市企业自主创新的财税激励政策研究》”（编号：2011037）;中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“我国税收征管效率研究”（编号：31541010901）.

  本文关键词：财政分权对中国环境污染影响程度的实证分析，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。