基础教育课程改革相关主体间的利益博弈——基于“经济人”假设的视角

发布时间：2018-01-19 10:17

本文关键词： “经济人” 课程设计主体课程实施主体课程评价主体利益博弈　出处：《中国教育学刊》2016年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：一般而言,课程设计主体、课程实施主体以及课程评价主体是基础教育课程改革中的三类关键主体,三者利益追求有所不同:课程设计主体重视教育规律,追求教育理想;课程实施主体寻求实际价值,承担社会使命;课程评价主体回应社会关切,促进教育公平。作为"经济人",三大主体间不可避免地形成利益博弈。课程设计主体与课程实施主体间形成委托代理博弈,极易引发"逆向选择",改变当前的激励机制不失为有效方式;课程实施主体与课程评价主体间存在主从博弈,避免博弈困境关键在于调整利益结构;课程设计主体与课程评价主体间类似"囚徒困境",设计恰切的制度是改变双方博弈结构,走出困境实现共赢的有效措施。
[Abstract]:Generally speaking, the main body of curriculum design, the subject of curriculum implementation and the subject of curriculum evaluation are three kinds of key subjects in the reform of basic education curriculum. The three subjects pursue different interests: the subject of curriculum design attaches importance to the law of education. Pursue the ideal of education; The subject of curriculum implementation seeks practical value and undertakes social mission; The subject of curriculum evaluation responds to social concerns and promotes educational fairness. As an "economic man", the three main bodies inevitably form a game of interests, while the subject of curriculum design and the subject of curriculum implementation form a principal-agent game. It is easy to cause "adverse selection", and it is an effective way to change the current incentive mechanism. There is a master-slave game between the subject of curriculum implementation and the subject of curriculum evaluation, and the key to avoid the dilemma of game lies in adjusting the structure of interests. The design of appropriate system is an effective measure to change the game structure of both sides and to realize the win-win situation by changing the game structure between the subjects of curriculum design and the subject of curriculum evaluation, which is similar to the "Prisoner's Dilemma".
【作者单位】：南京师范大学教育科学学院;安徽师范大学教育科学学院;
【分类号】：G632.3
【正文快照】：

【参考文献】