关于苏教版高中语文教材与语文考试不足之处的反思
本文关键词: 苏教版高中语文教材 语文考试 不足之处 反思 出处:《华中师范大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:本论文以苏教版高中语文必修教材、选修教材和江苏省南京市语文考题(必修阶段和选修阶段的试卷)为研究对象。首先承认并肯定新课改给语文教材注入了新的血液,让语文教学充满了活力。新课程带来了很多机遇。比如它让传统课堂变得更加自主和自由、教师的专业发展带来了更多的机遇、对学校来讲,也可以促进它的变革等等。但是任何事物的发展都是有两面性的,课改也一样,师生角色的转变、新的课堂元素、教师和学生都将面临更多的挑战。本论文的重点不去探讨苏教版高中语文教材和语文考试的优点和它带来的机遇,重点探讨作为一线教师在用教材过程中体悟到它的不足之处。指出不足的真正目的在于完善新教材,使其更贴近现实,更好地为教师和学生服务。教材是课程和教学之间的媒介,它的重要性不言而喻。考试也是检测教师和学生的重要手段。教材和考试紧密关联,举足轻重。本论文准备从以下几个方面入手:第一章肯定苏教文高中语文教材与语文考试的积极可取之处;第二章指出苏教版高中语文必修教材存在的缺点,,将会重点探讨必修教材知识点无系统、三个年级教学无区分度的问题、必修教材基础知识点太少、过于重视人文素养的提高。第三章分析苏教版高中语文选修教材的不足之处,比如与必修教材的衔接,学生无选择权,过于学术化与学生实际情况不符等。第四章对苏教版语文考试命题内容进行分析,第一节探讨教材内容有但考试不考比如字形部分,成语部分,现代诗歌部分,唐诗宋词部分;第二节探讨教材中没有但考试考的情况,第一部分介绍病句、课外名句默写、文言文实词、虚词、特殊句式的情况;第三节苏教版高中语文考试专业术语,教材无说明。分别就修辞手法、诗歌鉴赏术语、散文鉴赏、小说鉴赏来举例。第五章就苏教版语文考试形式分析。第一节主观试题过多,降低了考试评价的客观性;第二节必修试卷与选修试卷无差别、评价方式单一;第三节教师学生成就感不高,试卷缺乏实用性和深度;第四节作文效率普遍偏低。分别就必修教材和选修教材期间作文训练随意性大,生活积累意识欠缺、漠视学生基本思维训练,批改方式单一几方面来阐述。本论文旨在将笔者在一线教学实践中发现的问题,以及针对这些问题把自己的粗浅的想法呈现出来,让未来的语文教育更好地开展。同时笔者也希望通过与国外教材,以及我国香港、我国台湾地区的语文试题进行比较,希望苏教板教材能够取长补短,更加完善,从而达到语文教材与试卷编制更加的科学化,逐步完善这种考试形式和制度,发挥教学评价的作用的目的。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the subjects of this thesis are the required Chinese textbooks, elective textbooks and Nanjing language examination questions in Jiangsu Province. Firstly, it is acknowledged and affirmed that the new curriculum reform has injected new blood into the Chinese teaching materials. The new curriculum brings a lot of opportunities. For example, it makes the traditional classroom more autonomous and free, and the professional development of teachers brings more opportunities for schools. It can also promote its change and so on. But there are two sides to the development of everything. The same is true of curriculum reform, the change of the role of teachers and students, and the new elements of the classroom. Both teachers and students will face more challenges. The focus of this paper is not to discuss the advantages and opportunities of the Chinese textbook and language examination in the Soviet language edition. This paper mainly discusses the deficiency of teaching material in the process of teaching material, and points out that the real purpose of the deficiency is to perfect the new teaching material and make it more close to the reality. Better serve teachers and students. Teaching materials are a medium between curriculum and teaching, and their importance is self-evident. Examinations are also an important means of testing teachers and students. Textbooks and exams are closely related. This paper intends to start with the following aspects: the first chapter affirms the positive and desirable aspects of the Chinese teaching materials and the Chinese examination in the high school of Soviet education and education; In the second chapter, the author points out the shortcomings of the required teaching materials in senior high school, which will focus on the problems of the lack of systematic knowledge in the required textbooks, the lack of discrimination in the teaching of the three grades, and the fact that the basic knowledge points of the required textbooks are too few. The third chapter analyzes the shortcomings of the Soviet-edition high school Chinese elective textbooks, such as the link with the compulsory teaching materials, students have no choice. The 4th chapter analyzes the content of the Chinese examination in Su Jiao edition. The first section discusses the content of the teaching material, such as the glyph part, the idiom part, the modern poetry part, the Tang poetry part and the Song ci part. The first part introduces the sick sentence, the silent writing of the extracurricular famous sentence, the literal words in classical Chinese, the function words, the special sentence structure. The teaching material has no explanation. The examples are rhetoric, poetry appreciation terminology, prose appreciation, and novel appreciation. Chapter 5th analyzes the form of Chinese examination in Su Jiao edition. The first section has too many subjective questions, which reduces the objectivity of examination evaluation; In the second section, there is no difference between the compulsory test paper and the elective test paper, and the evaluation method is single, while in the third section, the teacher's students' sense of achievement is not high, and the test paper lacks practicability and depth. 4th sections of composition efficiency are generally low. During the period of compulsory teaching materials and elective textbooks, the composition training is random, the consciousness of life accumulation is lacking, and the students' basic thinking training is ignored. The purpose of this paper is to present the problems found in the first line of teaching practice, as well as to present my own superficial ideas in view of these problems. Let the language education in the future be better developed. At the same time, the author also hopes that through the comparison with foreign teaching materials, as well as with the language test questions in Hong Kong and Taiwan, I hope that the teaching materials of the Soviet Union can make up for each other's weaknesses and become more perfect. In order to achieve a more scientific Chinese textbook and examination paper compilation, gradually improve the examination form and system, play the role of teaching evaluation.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G633.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李明高;对新编高中语文教材的反观和前瞻[J];教学与管理;2001年02期
2 叶元彩;高中语文课程建设与新编高中语文教材创新[J];教学与管理;2002年10期
3 陈庆云;课文的阅读提示应具备哪些特征——对现行高中语文教材的审视[J];教学与管理;2003年19期
4 许宏伟;;高中语文教材规范问题例谈[J];中国教育学刊;2006年06期
5 林艳;;新课标下的高中语文教材分析[J];泰安教育学院学报岱宗学刊;2006年03期
6 胡栩鸿;;现行高中语文教材的编写体系及其编选特点[J];湖北教育学院学报;2006年11期
7 付振华;;高中语文教材对《杜十娘怒沉百宝箱》的删改[J];语文建设;2007年04期
8 陈良卓;;高中语文教材三解[J];文学教育(下);2008年06期
9 熊小林;;浅析高中语文教材中古典爱情诗词赏析的意义[J];当代教育论坛(学科教育研究);2008年09期
10 杨再雄;;对高中语文教材的两点疑问[J];文学教育(上);2009年07期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 肖伟;孙朝霞;;探寻高中语文教材中的传统文化[A];中国当代教育理论文献——第四届中国教育家大会成果汇编(下)[C];2007年
2 邓城锋;;香港高中语文教材的文化学习分析[A];第二届全国教育教材语言专题学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
3 余英;;直面爱情——帮助学生树立正确的爱情观[A];中华教育理论与实践科研论文成果选编(第3卷)[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前7条
1 董阳;向“80后”进言[N];人民日报;2010年
2 钱红艳;专家揭秘新版高中语文教材[N];南京日报;2004年
3 人民教育出版社 顾之川;高中语文教材改革的几个问题[N];中国教育报;2000年
4 本报记者 章红雨;让作家、教师“亲密接触”[N];中国新闻出版报;2012年
5 北京师范大学 康震;引导理性、学术地研读[N];社会科学报;2007年
6 本报记者 李新;还我朗朗书声[N];21世纪经济报道;2007年
7 江西省大余中学 金小中 ;人教版高中语文教材求疵[N];南方周末;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 孙慧玲;我国高中语文教材编制模式研究[D];华东师范大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 徐聪;论高中语文教材新体系的构建[D];福建师范大学;2001年
2 周艳春;高中语文教材的变革及教师应对策略[D];辽宁师范大学;2005年
3 关桂娟;浅析粤版高中语文教材的语文性[D];东北师范大学;2006年
4 郑丽芳;试论高中语文教材的文化研究[D];山东师范大学;2007年
5 杨小花;论高中语文教材中悲剧性作品的教育意义及实施策略[D];辽宁师范大学;2011年
6 魏永召;鲁教版高中语文教材文言文注释研究[D];河北师范大学;2012年
7 刘冲;海峡两岸高中语文教材比较研究[D];河北大学;2015年
8 富予;人教社2007版高中语文教材中花卉意象的美育研究[D];中央民族大学;2015年
9 刘先萍;高中语文教材爱情教育及教学探析[D];陕西师范大学;2015年
10 李晨;高中语文教材中悲剧性作品的分析和教学策略研究[D];陕西师范大学;2015年
,本文编号:1536900
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/1536900.html