当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 初中教育论文 >

英国IGCSE Chemistry与我国人教版高中化学必修教材的比较研究

发布时间:2018-04-14 11:34

  本文选题:IGCSE + Chemistry ; 参考:《辽宁师范大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:论文基于比较教育学等理论,以最新版的英国及国际学校化学教材IGCSE Chemistry及我国人教版高中化学教材《必修1》、《必修2》为研究对象,运用文献法、内容分析法及比较分析法等研究方法,从课程标准的性质、内容标准及评价标准角度分析两套教材的设计理念,明确教材设计依据。对英国的学制及“普通中等教育证书(GCSE)”、“GCSE”与“IGCSE”的关系等内容进行了简要分析研究。分别就教材体系结构、内容设置、实验部分和教材的栏目、习题及插图等呈现方式以及典型知识点,从宏观、微观两方面对两国教材进行了比较分析,对我国高中化学教材编制和使用提出了建议。研究表明,相较我国人教版化学必修教材,英国IGCSE Chemistry教材体系结构更为细致完整,教材后置部分工具性较为明显;教材内容设置上知识覆盖面较广,侧重体现化学与生活、经济、社会及自然环境的联系,渗透化学与其他学科交融的思想;实验部分较为系统全面,侧重实验技能的应用,注重实验与生产生活的联系;教材呈现方面,栏目设置简略,利用率高,习题设置难易度区别较大,插图形式丰富、数量较大、设计精美。比较分析两国教材的差异,对我国今后化学教材的编制具有一定借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:Based on the theory of comparative education, this paper takes IGCSE Chemistry, the latest edition of English and international school chemistry textbooks, and the senior high school chemistry textbooks < required 1 > and < compulsory 2 > > as the research objects, and applies the literature method.This paper analyzes the design concepts of the two sets of textbooks from the aspects of the nature of curriculum standards, content standards and evaluation standards, and clarifies the basis for the design of teaching materials by the methods of content analysis and comparative analysis.The relationship between GCSE and GCSE, GCSE and GCSE in UK is briefly analyzed.This paper makes a comparative analysis of the teaching materials of the two countries from the macro and micro aspects, including the system structure, content setting, experimental part and the column, exercises and illustrations of the teaching materials, as well as the typical knowledge points.Some suggestions are put forward for the compilation and use of chemistry teaching materials in senior high schools in China.The research shows that compared with the required teaching materials of chemistry in China, IGCSE Chemistry textbook system in England is more detailed and complete, the latter part of teaching materials is more instrumental, and the content of teaching materials has a wide coverage of knowledge, emphasizing on the embodiment of chemistry and life.The connection of economy, society and natural environment, the idea of permeating chemistry and other disciplines; the experiment part is systematic and comprehensive, focusing on the application of experimental skills, paying attention to the connection between experiment and production and life.High utilization rate, difficulty in setting exercises, rich illustrations, large quantity and exquisite design.The comparison and analysis of the differences between the two countries' teaching materials can be used for reference in the compilation of chemistry textbooks in China in the future.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G633.8

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 陈时见;;比较教育学的概念建构及其现实意义[J];比较教育研究;2013年04期

2 王祖浩;;对我国高中化学课程标准实施和修订的审视[J];基础教育课程;2013年Z1期

3 苟莉莉;王后雄;;英国GCSE化学考试的综合实践技能评价模式[J];化学教学;2012年06期

4 周开军;;STSE理念及其与中学化学教学的整合[J];化学教育;2012年01期

5 罗秀玲;黄淡花;;高中生对化学教科书习题的态度和评价的调查研究[J];化学教育;2011年11期

6 滕e,

本文编号:1749153


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/1749153.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2b344***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com