我国现代议论文写作观述评
发布时间：2018-08-30 08:51
【摘要】：议论文是人类理性智慧的成果和结晶。议论文写作是中学语文作文教学的主要内容,也是信息时代人们表明态度、发表主张、传递思想的重要载体。随着其在社会生活各个领域中的作用日益显现,人们对议论文写作能力和写作素养提出了更高的要求。然而,反观目前的议论文写作现状,假话、空话、套话泛滥之余,模式化、八股化的风气也极为盛行,扭转这种局面已是当务之急。追根溯源,其原因还在于人们对于议论文、议论文写作存在着一些认知偏差。因此,从指导议论文写作实践的议论文观、议论文写作观着手,将其进行一番相对全面系统的梳理,对于纠正人们的认知偏差以及指导议论文写作和议论文写作教学实践都十分必要。本文在收集了大量文献资料的基础上,选择梁启超、叶圣陶、夏丐尊、孙绍振、马正平、潘新和等十六位有代表性的现代语文教育家、学者的议论文观、议论文写作观,分别从动力、目的、性质、类别、说理、思维、受众七个方面出发,各有侧重地对其进行了梳理和述评。同时,通过分析和比较其异同点,在总结前人观点的基础上,试图提出几点自己的认识和看法,以期其能深化人们对于议论文、议论文写作的了解和认识,对议论文写作和议论文写作教学实践有所助益。
[Abstract]:Argumentation is the fruit and crystallization of human rational wisdom. Argumentative writing is the main content of Chinese composition teaching in middle school, and it is also an important carrier for people to express their attitude, express their opinions and convey their thoughts in the information age. With its role in various fields of social life, people put forward higher requirements for argumentative writing ability and writing literacy. However, the current situation of argumentative writing, falsehood, empty talk, platitudes, patterns and stereotyping are also prevailing, so it is urgent to reverse this situation. The reason lies in the cognitive bias of argumentation and argumentative writing. Therefore, starting from the argumentative viewpoint which guides the practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing view, it is comparatively comprehensive and systematic to sort it out. It is necessary to correct people's cognitive bias and guide the teaching practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing. On the basis of collecting a great deal of literature, this paper chooses 16 representative modern Chinese educationalists and scholars, such as Liang Qichao, Ye Shengtao, Xia Gaozun, Sun Shaozhen, Ma Zhengping, Pan Xinhe, and so on, as well as their argumentation and argumentative writing views. Respectively from the motive force, the purpose, the nature, the category, the reasoning, the thought, the audience seven aspects, respectively has carried on the combing and the commentary emphatically to it. At the same time, through the analysis and comparison of its similarities and differences, on the basis of summarizing the previous views, this paper tries to put forward some of its own understanding and views in order to deepen people's understanding and understanding of argumentation and argumentative writing. It is helpful to the teaching practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing.
【学位授予单位】：福建师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.34
本文编号：2212584
[Abstract]:Argumentation is the fruit and crystallization of human rational wisdom. Argumentative writing is the main content of Chinese composition teaching in middle school, and it is also an important carrier for people to express their attitude, express their opinions and convey their thoughts in the information age. With its role in various fields of social life, people put forward higher requirements for argumentative writing ability and writing literacy. However, the current situation of argumentative writing, falsehood, empty talk, platitudes, patterns and stereotyping are also prevailing, so it is urgent to reverse this situation. The reason lies in the cognitive bias of argumentation and argumentative writing. Therefore, starting from the argumentative viewpoint which guides the practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing view, it is comparatively comprehensive and systematic to sort it out. It is necessary to correct people's cognitive bias and guide the teaching practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing. On the basis of collecting a great deal of literature, this paper chooses 16 representative modern Chinese educationalists and scholars, such as Liang Qichao, Ye Shengtao, Xia Gaozun, Sun Shaozhen, Ma Zhengping, Pan Xinhe, and so on, as well as their argumentation and argumentative writing views. Respectively from the motive force, the purpose, the nature, the category, the reasoning, the thought, the audience seven aspects, respectively has carried on the combing and the commentary emphatically to it. At the same time, through the analysis and comparison of its similarities and differences, on the basis of summarizing the previous views, this paper tries to put forward some of its own understanding and views in order to deepen people's understanding and understanding of argumentation and argumentative writing. It is helpful to the teaching practice of argumentative writing and argumentative writing.
【学位授予单位】：福建师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.34
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 于水;;议论文文体学论纲[J];佳木斯教育学院学报;1987年03期
2 卓立子;;议论文写作教学的目标走向[J];语文教学与研究;2007年22期
3 尹继东;;对“议论文三要素”弊害的反思与探讨[J];语文建设;2012年11期
4 潘新和;;现代名家论辨文旨趣观述评[J];语文建设;2013年01期
5 周媛;;高中语文议论文写作有效教学初探[J];新课程导学;2013年30期
6 陈军;;论辩型议论文部分[J];语文教学通讯;1987年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 肖牡;高中生议论文写作有效教学初探[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
2 及葳;中学议论文作文教学中思维能力的培养[D];首都师范大学;2008年
3 臧克娟;高中议论文写作教学现状与改革研究[D];重庆师范大学;2012年
，本文编号：2212584
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2212584.html
