区域提升学校课程品质的科研实践——以N市初中课程与科研调查为例
发布时间:2018-11-08 08:08
【摘要】:课程品质是学校课程建设与发展的焦点,也是新一轮学校特色化发展的重要抓手。然而,调查显示,学校课程建设存在执行力较强但创新能力薄弱、数量较多但质量不高、内容涉及较广但实施形式单一、教师参与度不高、缺乏与科研良性互动等问题。为此,特别需要加强科研支撑,坚持前瞻性与实效性、适切性与普适性、开放性与独立性、常态推进与重点工程相结合的原则,探索定制式课题、推动主题式合作科研、高品质示范引领,促进教育科研与学校课程的多维互动。
[Abstract]:Curriculum quality is the focus of school curriculum construction and development, and it is also an important grasp of the new round of special development of schools. However, the investigation shows that there are some problems in the construction of school curriculum, such as strong executive power but weak innovation ability, large quantity but not high quality, wide content but single implementation form, low participation of teachers, lack of good interaction with scientific research and so on. Therefore, it is especially necessary to strengthen the support of scientific research, adhere to the principles of foresight and effectiveness, relevance and universality, openness and independence, combine normal propulsion with key projects, explore custom-made topics, and promote theme-oriented cooperative scientific research. Lead by high-quality demonstration and promote multi-dimensional interaction between educational research and school curriculum.
【作者单位】: 江苏省南京市教育科学研究所;
【基金】:全国教育科学“十二五”规划2012年度单位资助教育部规划课题《区域提升学校课程品质的研究》(课题批准号:FHB120479) 江苏省教育科学“十二五”规划课题《区域提升南京市学校校本课程品质的研究》(课题立项号:D/2013/02/321)阶段性成果
【分类号】:G632.3
本文编号:2317884
[Abstract]:Curriculum quality is the focus of school curriculum construction and development, and it is also an important grasp of the new round of special development of schools. However, the investigation shows that there are some problems in the construction of school curriculum, such as strong executive power but weak innovation ability, large quantity but not high quality, wide content but single implementation form, low participation of teachers, lack of good interaction with scientific research and so on. Therefore, it is especially necessary to strengthen the support of scientific research, adhere to the principles of foresight and effectiveness, relevance and universality, openness and independence, combine normal propulsion with key projects, explore custom-made topics, and promote theme-oriented cooperative scientific research. Lead by high-quality demonstration and promote multi-dimensional interaction between educational research and school curriculum.
【作者单位】: 江苏省南京市教育科学研究所;
【基金】:全国教育科学“十二五”规划2012年度单位资助教育部规划课题《区域提升学校课程品质的研究》(课题批准号:FHB120479) 江苏省教育科学“十二五”规划课题《区域提升南京市学校校本课程品质的研究》(课题立项号:D/2013/02/321)阶段性成果
【分类号】:G632.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王勇;;学校课程建设论略[J];吉林教育;2012年18期
2 厉墨龙;;科学引领学校课程建设 全面推进素质教育[J];江苏教育研究;2006年03期
3 季银泉;;论学校课程建设的管理[J];教学与管理;2007年18期
4 李颖;;生命教育与学校课程建设[J];现代教育科学;2010年06期
5 胡杰;;学校课程建设的冷思考[J];上海教育;2014年Z1期
6 黄瑞;;从误区到经验:拓展学校课程建设的空间[J];今日教育;2014年04期
7 林静;;学校课程发展现状调研:基于课程整合的视角——以江苏省南京市为例[J];教育科学论坛;2014年03期
8 乔世伟;王健;;提高教师课程执行力 推进学校课程建设[J];现代教学;2009年09期
9 李永培;;校长的课程领导力与学校发展——新课程背景下学校课程建设的几点思考[J];中小学校长;2010年12期
10 王玉玺;;基于师生发展的学校课程建设[J];教育;2012年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 陕西省汉中中学副校长 黄兆全;做课程建设的引领者和实践者[N];中国教育报;2013年
,本文编号:2317884
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2317884.html