高校教师职务晋升科研评价条件探析

发布时间：2018-01-05 03:16

本文关键词：高校教师职务晋升科研评价条件探析　出处：《江苏高教》2017年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：课题和经费是开展科学研究、取得学术成果的重要条件,但其本身不是学术成果,不能直接用于高校教师职务晋升的科研评价。不考虑课题、经费与学术成果的性质差异,将课题、经费一同纳入高校教师职务晋升的科研成果量化评价体系,极易导致一系列消极影响,污染学术环境,影响高校学术活动的健康开展。在这样的意义上,我国高校教师职务特别是部分学科教师职务晋升的科研水平考核确有必要根本改变现行的量化考核体系,将重点聚焦于高水平科研成果的数量与质量。为此,高校必须建立教师职务晋升学术成果评审专家库,必须高度尊重专家意见,确保高校教师职务晋升的学术性、严谨性和程序性。
[Abstract]:Subject and fund are important conditions for carrying out scientific research and obtaining academic achievements, but they are not academic achievements themselves and can not be directly used for the evaluation of scientific research in the promotion of university teachers' positions. The difference between the nature of funds and academic achievements, the subject, together with funds into the quantitative evaluation system of scientific research achievements of teachers' promotion in colleges and universities, it is easy to lead to a series of negative effects and pollute the academic environment. In this sense, it is necessary to fundamentally change the current quantitative assessment system for the assessment of scientific research level in the promotion of teachers' positions, especially in some disciplines. Focusing on the quantity and quality of high-level scientific research results, colleges and universities must establish a pool of experts for the evaluation of academic achievements in the promotion of teachers' positions, and must highly respect the opinions of experts. Ensure academic, rigorous and procedural promotion of university teachers.
【作者单位】：北京信息科技大学高教研究室;
【基金】：北京信息科技大学2016年度高教研究立项课题“高校教师学术评价问题再研究”(项目编号:2012GJZD02)
【分类号】：G647
【正文快照】： 本文讨论的高校教师职务晋升,特指学术职务晋升。本文讨论的学科特指主要依靠学者的大脑、电子信息资源、图书资源等,并且事实上仅靠个人行为即可展开研究的学科,而需要大笔研究经费、硬性研究平台,必须通过立项、集体攻关才能有效展开研究的学科不在本文讨论之列。学术职务是

【参考文献】