我国研究型大学校长公开选拔制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 12:00

本文选题：研究型大学 + 大学校长　；参考：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：大学校长作为大学的领导者,不仅是大学的管理者更是灵魂。一个优秀的大学校长能够带领一所大学的走向更远更好的未来,选拔出优秀的校长离不开一个科学的大学校长遴选制度。为了适应时代发展的要求,实现建设世界一流大学的目标,教育部积极探索完善大学校长选拔任用办法,并开始了公开选拔五所直属高校校长的试点改革工作。构建科学的大学校长公开选拔制度,选拔出适应时代要求和国情需要的大学校长,对于促进我国大学的发展具有重要意义。目前我国大学的校长主要由政府任命,具有角色定位不清,无法适应新的时代要求;选拔标准不够详细具体,未建立起完善的选拔指标体系;选拔程序不够公开民主;缺乏相应的监督考核机制等问题。教育部在试行的公开选拔直属高校校长的过程中设立包括教育部领导、高校干部管理负责人、直属高校的党委书记和校长以及教师、学生、离退休干部等在内的遴选委员会作为选拔主体;在全国乃至全球范围内选拔适合人选,不再局限于本校本、地区内;选拔过程严格有序高效,选拔出的五位校长都相对年轻并具有一定管理经验,积累了一定的成功经验同时仍有一些需要改进的不足,具体包括选拔标准体系不完善,选拔结果具有较明显的政治性等。以英国《泰晤士报高等教育副刊》公布的2016年度世界大学排名前100中的14所美国公立研究型大学作为研究对象,分析发现美国公立研究型大学的校长遴选由遴选委员会依据完善的选拔标准体系和严格的选拔过程选出,具有性别比例分布合理,学科背景范围广泛,上任年龄大,任期长,任职经历丰富,学术成就高等特点。在坚持我国的具体国情的基础上,有选择的借鉴美国公立研究型大学校长遴选的成功经验,完善我国的大学校长公开选拔制度。需要明确大学校长的角色定位,弱化其行政身份并促进大学校长的职业化和专业化发展;建立完善的选拔标准指标体系,对大学校长的政治品质、教育背景、职业背景、学术成就、个人品格等进行全面细致的考察;制定科学民主的选拔程序;构建有力的监督考核机制,确保大学校长的公开选拔工作在公平公开的环境下进行,并能够对其工作成效进行全面细致的考核。
[Abstract]:As the leader of the university, the university president is not only the manager of the university, but also the soul. A good university president can lead a university to a far and better future, and the selection of a good president can not be achieved without a scientific selection system of university presidents. In order to meet the requirements of the development of the times and to realize the goal of building world-class universities, the Ministry of Education has actively explored and perfected the methods of selecting and appointing university presidents, and has begun the pilot reform of the open selection of the presidents of five universities directly affiliated to them. It is of great significance to construct a scientific open selection system for university presidents and to select university presidents who meet the needs of the times and national conditions for promoting the development of universities in China. At present, the presidents of universities in our country are mainly appointed by the government. They are unable to adapt to the requirements of the new era because of their unclear roles, the selection criteria are not detailed and concrete, the selection index system is not established, and the selection procedure is not open and democratic. Lack of corresponding supervision and assessment mechanism and so on. The establishment of the Ministry of Education in the process of open selection of university presidents directly under the Ministry of Education includes the leadership of the Ministry of Education, the responsible persons in charge of the management of cadres in colleges and universities, the secretaries of party committees and presidents of directly affiliated universities, teachers and students, The selection committee, including retired cadres, is the main body of selection; the selection of suitable candidates in the whole country and even the world is no longer confined to this school or region; the selection process is strictly orderly and efficient. The five principals selected are relatively young and have certain management experience, and have accumulated certain successful experience. At the same time, there are still some shortcomings that need to be improved, including the imperfect selection standard system and the obvious political nature of the selection results. Taking 14 public research universities in the top 100 of the world's universities in 2016, published by the Times Supplement for higher Education, as research subjects, It is found that the selection of presidents of public research universities in the United States is selected by the selection committee according to the perfect selection standard system and strict selection process, with a reasonable distribution of gender ratio, a wide range of disciplines, a long term of office and a long term of office. Rich experience, academic achievements and other characteristics. On the basis of adhering to the specific conditions of our country, we can learn from the successful experience of the selection of the presidents of public research universities in the United States selectively, and perfect the open selection system of university presidents in our country. It is necessary to define the role of university presidents, weaken their administrative status and promote the professional and professional development of university presidents, and establish a perfect selection standard index system for the political quality, educational background and professional background of university presidents. Academic achievements, personal character, etc. are investigated in a comprehensive and meticulous manner; scientific and democratic selection procedures are formulated; and a powerful supervisory and assessment mechanism is established to ensure that the open selection of university presidents is carried out in a fair and open environment. And can carry on the comprehensive meticulous examination to its work result.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G647.1

【参考文献】