省域高校教育信息化发展水平评估研究

发布时间：2019-06-22 19:00

【摘要】：高校教育信息化是我国教育信息化发展的重要组成部分,对于创新高校人才培养模式,提升高校科研和管理水平都具有非常重要的意义。目前,我国高校教育信息化建设已取得一定成绩,但由于经济水平、政策支持、制度规划等现实因素的制约和影响,高校教育信息化的整体发展存在着诸多问题。在这种情况下,需要开展高校教育信息化评估研究,客观了解和分析高校教育信息化的发展现状和存在的问题。这样才能有针对性的提出对策建议,引导和推动高校教育信息化健康、快速、可持续的发展。本文对国内外高校教育信息化评估的发展脉络、评估项目、指标体系和计算方法等相关研究资料进行分析总结。以《教育信息化十年发展规划(2011-2020)》中高校教育信息化发展的主要内容为依据,并借鉴相关文献资料的研究成果,构建了省域高校教育信息化发展水平的评估指标体系。采用灰色综合评价法对省域高校教育信息化发展水平开展了实证研究,同时运用聚类分析法和差异系数计算方法从各个维度出发对各省(市)的发展情况进行了对比分析。为进一步研究差异构成要素,采用泰尔指数测算了东、中、西三大区域的发展差异并量化了区域差异对总体差异的贡献程度。结合评估结果和多方位的对比研究,总结了高校教育信息化的不同发展模式,并为高校教育信息化的可持续发展提出了对策建议。从高校教育信息化的综合水平来看,广东、山东省发展最好,重庆、河南和天津次之,而广西、甘肃、山西等省份发展较弱。从高校教育信息化的五大维度来看,数字资源发展最好,其次是管理信息化和资源应用,而基础设施和机制保障的发展最弱。从高校教育信息化的省域层面发展来看,各省(市)在综合水平和基础设施两个方面的发展差距较小,其次是管理信息化和资源应用,而在数字资源和机制保障两个方面的省际间发展差距比较大。进一步从地区层面分析,东、中、西部地区内部的差异对总体差异的影响程度较大,而且以综合水平发展最好的东部地区差异情况最为严重。
[Abstract]:The informatization of university education is an important part of the development of educational informatization in our country, which is of great significance to innovate the mode of talent training in colleges and universities and to improve the level of scientific research and management in colleges and universities. At present, some achievements have been made in the construction of educational informatization in colleges and universities in our country, but due to the restriction and influence of economic level, policy support, institutional planning and other practical factors, there are many problems in the overall development of educational informatization in colleges and universities. In this case, it is necessary to carry out the evaluation and research of educational informatization in colleges and universities, and objectively understand and analyze the present situation and existing problems of the development of educational informatization in colleges and universities. Only in this way can we put forward countermeasures and suggestions to guide and promote the healthy, rapid and sustainable development of educational informatization in colleges and universities. This paper analyzes and summarizes the development, evaluation items, index system and calculation methods of educational informatization evaluation in colleges and universities at home and abroad. Based on the main contents of the development of educational informatization in the Ten-year Development Plan of Educational Informatization (20112020), and drawing lessons from the research results of relevant literature, this paper constructs the evaluation index system of the development level of educational informatization in colleges and universities in provinces and regions. This paper makes an empirical study on the development level of educational informatization in colleges and universities in provinces and regions by using the grey comprehensive evaluation method, and makes a comparative analysis on the development of each province (city) from each dimension by using cluster analysis method and difference coefficient calculation method. In order to further study the constituent elements of differences, the development differences of the three regions in the east, middle and west are measured by Tyre index, and the contribution of regional differences to the overall differences is quantified. Combined with the evaluation results and multi-directional comparative study, this paper summarizes the different development models of educational informatization in colleges and universities, and puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for the sustainable development of educational informatization in colleges and universities. From the point of view of the comprehensive level of educational informatization in colleges and universities, Guangdong and Shandong Province have the best development, Chongqing, Henan and Tianjin are the second, while Guangxi, Gansu, Shanxi and other provinces have weak development. From the five dimensions of educational informatization in colleges and universities, the development of digital resources is the best, followed by management informatization and resource application, while the development of infrastructure and mechanism guarantee is the weakest. From the provincial level of educational informatization in colleges and universities, the development gap between provinces (cities) in comprehensive level and infrastructure is small, followed by management informatization and resource application, while in digital resources and mechanism guarantee, the development gap between provinces is relatively large. Further from the regional level, the differences between the east, the middle and the west have a great influence on the overall differences, and the differences in the east, where the comprehensive level is the best, are the most serious.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G649.2

【参考文献】