教育改革代价研究

发布时间：2018-02-09 23:35

本文关键词： 教育改革代价风险责任公正　出处：《华东师范大学》2008年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 教育的发展总是通过不断地改革来推进。不可否认,教育改革的历史是一个不断付出代价的历史,无代价的教育发展是不可能的。既然代价是教育改革与发展中不可避免的现象,那么,从代价的角度来审视教育改革与发展就是有必要的。反思教育改革的代价有助于我们对教育改革本身的合理性进行追问,是否一切改革都是合理的、必要的?如果教育改革必然要付出代价,那么,什么样的代价是合理的?什么样的代价是我们可以承受的?由谁来承担改革的代价?对于教育改革的代价,我们该如何应对?等等,这一系列的问题都是我们应该且必须考虑的理论与现实问题。本研究主要采用的是文献分析法和历史研究法,借助相关学科的某些理论,对教育改革中的代价问题进行探讨。论文主要分为四个部分。论文的第一部分从相关学科对代价的界定,以及代价与成本、风险的关系辨析入手,对本论文中的教育改革代价的内涵进行了界定;分析了其主要特点及主要表现;分析了评判教育改革代价合理性应考虑的三个因素。论文的第二部分旨在探讨教育改革代价产生的根源。论文认为,不能一概而论、抽象地谈论教育改革代价产生的根源。教育改革代价从其产生的可能性来看,有必然性代价和或然性代价,导致二者产生的根源各不相同,应该有所区别地来探寻教育改革代价产生的根源。教育改革不可避免要产生代价,而代价总是意味着不好的东西,我们应该采取一些有效措施去防范、减少,甚至消除某些代价。论文的第三部分主要探讨了在教育改革代价产生之前,应该采取有效措施来防范和规避代价,以期尽量减少必然性代价,消除或然性代价。本文主要着眼于分析教育改革者的风险意识和责任意识,认为教育改革者只有从主观上增强了风险意识和责任意识,才有可能尽量减少或消除教育改革的代价。事实上,无论主观上我们如何防范,教育改革还是会产生代价,对于不可避免会产生的代价存在着如何调控的问题。本文认为,教育改革代价调控的实质在于对实际上产生了的代价(本文将其限定为必然性代价)进行公正的分配或者说引导人们来进行合理分担。论文的第四部分分析了公正分配代价的原因,试图探讨在不同的人群中如何公正的分配教育改革的代价,提出了公正分配教育改革代价的四原则构想,即公正原则、差别原则、应得原则和补偿原则;提出了合理分配代价的手段,主要有文化手段和制度手段。
[Abstract]:The development of education is always promoted through continuous reform. Undeniably, the history of educational reform is a history of constant costs. It is impossible to develop education at no cost. Since the cost is an inevitable phenomenon in the reform and development of education, then, It is necessary to examine the reform and development of education from the angle of cost. Reflecting on the cost of education reform is helpful for us to inquire into the rationality of the reform itself. Is it reasonable and necessary for all the reforms to be carried out? If education reform has to pay a price, then what is the reasonable price? What kind of price can we bear? Who will bear the cost of reform? How should we deal with the costs of education reform? Wait, this series of problems are theoretical and practical problems that we should and must consider. This research mainly adopts the literature analysis method and the historical research method, with the help of some theories of related disciplines, discusses the question of the cost in the educational reform. The thesis is divided into four parts. The first part of the thesis begins with the definition of cost and the relationship between cost and cost and risk, defines the connotation of the cost of education reform in this paper, analyzes its main characteristics and performance. This paper analyzes three factors that should be considered in judging the cost rationality of educational reform. The second part of the paper aims to explore the root causes of the cost of education reform. The cost of inevitability and the cost of probability lead to different causes, so we should find out the origin of the cost of education reform differently. Education reform inevitably comes with a cost, and the cost always means something bad. We should take some effective measures to prevent and reduce it. The third part of the thesis mainly discusses that before the cost of education reform comes into being, effective measures should be taken to prevent and avoid the cost in order to reduce the cost of inevitability as far as possible. This paper focuses on the analysis of the risk and responsibility consciousness of the educational reformers, and thinks that the educational reformers only enhance their risk awareness and responsibility consciousness subjectively. It is possible to minimize or eliminate the cost of educational reform. In fact, no matter how we take precautions subjectively, the educational reform still comes with a cost, and there is a problem of how to regulate the inevitable cost. The essence of the regulation of the cost of education reform lies in the fair distribution of the actual cost (which is limited to the cost of inevitability in this paper) or in guiding people to share it reasonably. Part 4th of the thesis analyzes the public. The reason for the positive allocation of costs, This paper tries to discuss how to distribute the cost of educational reform fairly among different groups, and puts forward four principles of fair distribution of the cost of educational reform, namely, the principle of justice, the principle of difference, the principle of entitlement and the principle of compensation. Put forward the means of reasonable distribution of costs, mainly cultural means and institutional means.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：G40

【相似文献】