当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 教育创新论文 >

成渝两地大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度研究

发布时间:2018-01-13 13:27

  本文关键词:成渝两地大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度研究 出处:《西南大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 导生制 期望 满意度 关系 研究


【摘要】:高等教育对大学生的培养质量关系到我国国民经济的发展和教育质量的高低。本科生导生制是在我国高等教育大众化的形势下提出的一种以一位导师加几位大学生的教育培养模式。我国实施本科生导生制的目的在于提高高校教育教学的质量和管理效率,对大学生的成长成才提供有针对性的指导和帮助。大学生对本科生导生制有何期望,本科生导生制是否取得应有的成效,大学生对本科生导生制是否满意,这些问题国内目前还没有人专门研究过。为此,本研究对成渝两地大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度问题进行探讨。 本研究通过调查法研究了成渝两地大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度的现状和特点,分析了其中的影响因素及存在的问题,在此基础上,提出解决问题的对策,对于进一步搞好本科生导生制,提高本科生导生制的质量,促进大学生的健康发展,具有重要的意义。 1、自编的《大学生对本科生导生制的期望问卷》以及《大学生对本科生导生制的满意度问卷》具有较好信度和效度,符合心理测量学要求,能作为研究的测量工具。大学生对本科生导生制的期望得分依次为:能力期望学习期望人际期望情感期望。大学生对本科生导生制的满意度得分依次为:活动满意度自我发展满意度教师满意度。 2、不同性别的大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度没有显著差异。是否独生子女的大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度有显著差异,独生子女大学生的情感期望和自我发展满意度均显著高于非独生子女大学生。 3、不同专业的大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度没有显著差异。不同年级的大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度有显著差异。四年级大学生对本科生导生制的学习期望及期望总分显著高于三年级大学生,一年级大学生对本科生导生制的情感期望显著高于三年级大学生;四年级大学生对本科生导生制的自我发展满意度、教师满意度、活动满意度以及满意度总分上显著低于其他三个年级的大学生。 4、不同生源的大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度有显著差异,农村大学生对本科生导生制的学习期望和教师满意度显著高于城市大学生。不同学校水平的大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度有显著差异,重点大学学生的学习期望和能力期望及期望总分显著高于一般大学学生;一般大学学生对本科生导生制的满意度显著高于重点大学学生。 5、大学生对本科生导生制的期望和满意度各维度之间存在显著正相关。多元回归分析发现,大学生对本科生导生制学习期望和期望总分共解释自我发展满意度的11.1%;大学生对本科生导生制的情绪期望和期望总分对教师满意度的联合解释率为13.4%;大学生对本科生导生制的学习期望、能力期望和人际期望对活动满意度的联合解释率为5%;大学生对本科生导生制的能力期望和人际期望对满意度总体的联合解释率为10.2%。 6、根据本研究发现的问题,提出三条建议:加强学校的管理和相关制度的建立;提高本科生导师的积极性和责任心;根据大学生特点,提高本科生导生制的针对性和有效性。
[Abstract]:Higher education is the cultivation of students' quality is related to quality education and development of our national economy. The level of undergraduate tutor system is put forward in the popularization of higher education in China under the situation of a teacher with a few students. Undergraduate education training mode of Monitorial System aims to improve the quality of education in colleges and universities the implementation of teaching and management efficiency of our country, provide targeted guidance and help to the students. The college students for what to expect of undergraduate, undergraduate tutorial system is achieved due to the effectiveness of College Students' satisfaction of undergraduate tutorial system, these problems at present there is no special study for people. In this study, Chengdu and Chongqing University Students on undergraduate students by expectation and satisfaction problems were discussed.
Based on the investigation of Chengdu and Chongqing university students to guide undergraduate status and characteristics of expectation and satisfaction of the system, analyzes some influencing factors and problems, on this basis, put forward the countermeasures to solve the problems, to further improve the undergraduate tutorial system, improve the quality of undergraduate students guide system, promote the healthy development of college students, has an important significance.
1, the students of the undergraduate tutorial system in < > and < student expectations questionnaire has good reliability and validity of the questionnaire of undergraduate tutor system ", meet the requirements of psychometrics, measurement as a tool to study. Students of undergraduate tutor system expectation score according to the times: the ability of learning expectation Interpersonal Expectation expect emotional expectations. Students of undergraduate student guide satisfaction scores system is as follows: the self development of teachers' satisfaction satisfaction satisfaction activities.
2, to guide undergraduate students of different genders had no significant differences between the system of expectation and satisfaction. Whether the only child college students for expectation and satisfaction have significant difference on undergraduates, students of one-child emotional expectations and self development satisfaction were significantly higher than that of non only child college students.
3, different professional college students to guide undergraduates there was no significant difference between the expectation and satisfaction for students. Students of different grades of students for the expectation and satisfaction have significant differences on the fourth grade students. Undergraduate guide for undergraduate students by learning expectation and the total expectation for students is significantly higher than the third grade students, the first grade students of undergraduate tutorial system the emotional expectations were significantly higher than the third grade students; the fourth grade students of undergraduate tutor system satisfaction, self development of teachers' satisfaction, activity satisfaction and satisfaction score was significantly lower than the other three grade students.
4, different students system of expectation and satisfaction are significant to guide rural students to undergraduate, undergraduate tutor system learning expectation and teachers' satisfaction was significantly higher than that of city college students. Different school level students' expectation and satisfaction degree of the system are significant to guide undergraduate, learning expectation and expectation ability and expectation the focus of university students was significantly higher than that of normal university students; general university students tutor system for Undergraduates' satisfaction was significantly higher than that of key university students.
5, college students to guide undergraduate students there is a significant positive correlation between the expectation and satisfaction of various dimensions. Multiple regression analysis found that college students of undergraduate tutor system learning expectation, the total scores of self explanation development satisfaction 11.1%; college students to guide undergraduate emotional expectation, score system combined interpretation of teachers' satisfaction rate 13.4%; College of tutor system for undergraduate learning expectation, ability expectation and Interpersonal Expectation combined interpretation of the activity satisfaction rate was 5%; College of tutor system for undergraduates and expectations of the ability to explain Interpersonal Expectation combined overall satisfaction rate was 10.2%.
6, according to the problems found in this study, we put forward three proposals: strengthening school management and related system establishment, improving the enthusiasm and sense of responsibility of undergraduate tutors, and improving the pertinence and effectiveness of undergraduate guidance system according to the characteristics of undergraduates.

【学位授予单位】:西南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:B844.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 瞿国忠,于壮强,蔡丽莎;大学生就业意向实证分析[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2004年04期

2 陈猛;;青少年社会期望与自我评价的关系及其对教育的启示[J];西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年03期

3 杨容,张进辅,李艾丽莎,张净;重庆高校毕业生择业满意度及影响因素调查[J];重庆师范学院学报(自然科学版);2003年01期

4 傅真放;高等学校大学生满意度实证分析研究[J];高教论坛;2004年05期

5 胡晓辉;王唤明;;对高等教育顾客满意度的初步研究[J];国家教育行政学院学报;2006年05期

6 刘俊学;李正辉;赵雄辉;周斌;刘景忠;;大学生求学满意度影响因素及其程度的实证研究[J];高等教育研究;2006年11期

7 梅鹏;;高校顾客与顾客满意[J];商业经济;2006年06期

8 蔡立丰;梁洪坤;;高校学生满意度研究述评[J];经济与社会发展;2007年11期

9 王凯旋;;大学生时间管理倾向与生活满意度的相关研究[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2009年11期

10 王兴久;;教师期望效应形成机制与积极效应的促进[J];南方论刊;2008年02期

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 柴霞;重庆城区老年人家庭养老期待与子女支持的相关研究[D];西南大学;2007年

2 李春;父母对3-7岁儿童的期望及其影响因素分析[D];华南师范大学;2007年

3 杨慧敏;大学生对教师角色期望的调查研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2007年

4 刘雪莲;大学毕业生职业期望对就业满意度的影响研究[D];四川大学;2007年

5 黄永秀;普通高校成人教育类学生教学期望研究[D];西南大学;2008年

6 梁红霞;大学生的人际期望与心理健康研究[D];广西师范大学;2008年

7 杨清;高校学生教育消费满意度实证研究[D];华中农业大学;2008年

8 黄阳梅;长沙市三级甲等医院顾客满意度的研究[D];中南大学;2009年

9 黄中华;湖北地区民办高校大学生满意度调查研究[D];华中农业大学;2009年

10 何勇;KD企业基于顾客满意度测评的配镜服务过程研究[D];兰州大学;2010年



本文编号:1419052

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyugaigechuangxinlunwen/1419052.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f8063***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com