愤怒反刍思维量表中文版大学生人群信效度检验
发布时间：2018-07-15 13:28
【摘要】：目的:探讨"愤怒反刍思维量表(Anger Rumination Scale,ARS)"在中国大学生中的适用性及信度和效度检验。方法:采用方便抽样的方法,抽取434名大学生完成ARS量表的初测,抽取508名大学生完成ARS量表的正式施测,ARS量表正式施测时,同时完成作为效标的反刍思维量表(Ruminative Responses Scale,RRS)、特质愤怒量表(Trait Anger Scale,TAS)、攻击量表(Aggression Questionnaire,AQ)的测试,其中107名大学生四周后重测ARS量表。结果:ARS量表中文版的内部一致性信度为0.868,重测信度为0.679,条目-总分相关分析和因素分析结果表明中文版ARS量表与英文版保持了一致的量表结构,并有良好的效标关联效度,与各效标之间的相关系数分别为0.501,0.546,0.611。结论:ARS量表具有良好的信度与效度,可用于大学生愤怒反刍思维水平的评估。
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the applicability, reliability and validity of Anger rumination scale (ARS) in Chinese college students. Methods: 434 college students completed the initial test of ARS scale and 508 college students completed the formal test of ARS scale. At the same time, the Ruminative responses scale (RRS), trait Anger scale (TAS) and Aggression questionnaire (AQ) were tested. Results the reliability of internal consistency was 0.868, the reliability of retest was 0.679. The results of item total score correlation and factor analysis showed that the Chinese version of ARS had the same structure as the English version, and had good validity. The correlation coefficients between the two groups were 0.501 and 0.5460.11, respectively. Conclusion the scale has good reliability and validity, and can be used to evaluate the thinking level of angry ruminant of college students.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学意识形态战略研究中心;西南政法大学心理健康教育中心;第三军医大学心理学院;
【基金】：重庆市教育科学“十二五”规划2015资助项目(2015-GX-004) 西南政法大学2015资助项目(2015XZZD-07)
【分类号】：G444
，
本文编号：2124230
[Abstract]:Objective: to explore the applicability, reliability and validity of Anger rumination scale (ARS) in Chinese college students. Methods: 434 college students completed the initial test of ARS scale and 508 college students completed the formal test of ARS scale. At the same time, the Ruminative responses scale (RRS), trait Anger scale (TAS) and Aggression questionnaire (AQ) were tested. Results the reliability of internal consistency was 0.868, the reliability of retest was 0.679. The results of item total score correlation and factor analysis showed that the Chinese version of ARS had the same structure as the English version, and had good validity. The correlation coefficients between the two groups were 0.501 and 0.5460.11, respectively. Conclusion the scale has good reliability and validity, and can be used to evaluate the thinking level of angry ruminant of college students.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学意识形态战略研究中心;西南政法大学心理健康教育中心;第三军医大学心理学院;
【基金】：重庆市教育科学“十二五”规划2015资助项目(2015-GX-004) 西南政法大学2015资助项目(2015XZZD-07)
【分类号】：G444
，
本文编号：2124230
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2124230.html
