专业学位研究生心理健康及教育方案探索
[Abstract]:Professional degree postgraduates are an important and special group of postgraduates. Since the enrollment expansion of full-time professional degree postgraduates in 2009, professional degree postgraduate education has flourished. According to official data, the number of full-time professional degree postgraduates in 2015 was 252,000, accounting for 44% of the total number of postgraduates, and professional science. Graduate students have become an important part of the graduate population. As a special and emerging high-knowledge group in Colleges and universities, professional graduate students have to take part in internship while facing many tasks such as curriculum learning, subject research, thesis defense and employment, resulting in greatly reduced research time, career expectations and reality. Some professional degree postgraduates have anxiety, depression and other psychological diseases, and even have extreme behaviors that destroy social stability, such as suicide [1], hurting others [2]. Past research mainly focused on the mental health of academic degree postgraduates, but less on professional degree postgraduates. This paper analyzes the characteristics and influencing factors of mental health of professional degree postgraduates, explores the mental health education program of professional degree postgraduates around their mental health needs, and provides reference for mental health education of professional degree postgraduates. Subjects were assessed with Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), Trait Anxiety Inventory (Trait Anxiety Inventory, Form Y-B, T-AI), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depres sion Scale (SDS), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). The General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), the Interpersonal Comprehensive Diagnostic Scale (ICDS) and the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ) were used to assess the mental health, emotions, personality traits, and self-esteem of professional degree graduates. On this basis, through consultation with experts, tutors and postgraduates, a preliminary mental health education program for professional degree postgraduates was constructed. Results 1. The characteristics of mental health of professional degree postgraduates (1) Overall characteristics: professional degree research The detection rate of psychological problems was 11.11%; the positive rate of depressive symptoms was 8.5%; the positive rate of anxiety symptoms was 2.6%; the personality types: extroversion type 25.08%; intermediate type 51.11%; introversion type 23.81%; emotional stability: stable type 28.25%; intermediate type 49.84%; unstable type 21.91%; low self-confidence was 0.20%; low self-confidence was 15.45%; high self-confidence was 73.37%; high self-confidence was 10.81%; (3) Age characteristics: SCL-90 somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, hostility, paranoia, psychotic factor scores and total mean scores were significantly higher than those of'<24 years old'and'<25-29 years old'' (P 0.01, 0.05), and depression factor scores were significant. The scores of SAS and SDS were significantly higher than those of "25-29 years old" and "24 years old" (P 0.05), "25-29 years old" SAS scores were significantly higher than those of "24 years old" (P 0.05); "30 years old" introversion and extroversion factor scores were significantly lower than those of "24 years old" (P 0.05); (4) Educational level characteristics of doctoral students: SCL-90 somatization and "25-29 years old" (P 0.05). The score of obsessive-compulsive factors was significantly higher than that of master's (P 0.05). (5) Grade characteristics: Grade three graduate students'scores of SCL-90 were significantly higher than that of grade one, hostile, paranoid and total mean scores were significantly higher than that of grade two (P 0.05); SAS and SDS scores were significantly higher than that of grade one (P 0.05). (6) Child structure characteristics: Only-child graduate students' EPQ introversion and extroversion. The scores of factors were significantly higher than those of non-only children (P 0.05), and the scores of disguising factors were significantly lower than those of non-only children (P 0.05). (7) Environmental adaptation characteristics: The scores of SCL-90, TAI, SAS and SDS of graduates with good environmental adaptation were significantly lower than those of graduates with poor adaptation (P 0.05, 0.01). The scores of neuroticism factors were significantly higher than those of poorly adapted postgraduates (P 0.05). The scores of self-efficacy were significantly higher than those of poorly adapted postgraduates (P 0.05). (8) Characteristics of collective atmosphere: Except for terror factors, the scores of SCL-90 in harmonious atmosphere were significantly lower than those in arguing atmosphere (P 0.05). TAI, SAS, SDS scores were significantly higher than arguing atmosphere (P 0.05), introversion and extroversion factor scores were significantly higher than arguing atmosphere (P 0.05), psychoticism factor scores were significantly lower than arguing atmosphere (P 0.05); harmony atmosphere group self-efficacy scores were significantly higher than arguing atmosphere (P 0.05). (9) mentors'attitudes: except somatization and paranoia, mentors were more concerned about. The scores of SCL-90 and TAI were significantly lower than those of less caring (P 0.05); the scores of EPQ introversion, extroversion and disguise were significantly higher than those of less caring (P 0.05), and the scores of neuroticism were significantly lower than those of less caring (P 0.05); the scores of self-efficacy were significantly higher than those of less caring (P 0.05). (10) Attitudinal characteristics of counselors: The scores of counselors'self-efficacy with more concern were significantly higher than those with less concern (P 0.05). Good friends group (P 0.05). 2. General characteristics of interpersonal relationship of professional degree graduates (1) General characteristics: less interpersonal distress accounted for 72.15%, mild distress 17.28%, moderate distress 9.96%, severe distress 0.61%; high interpersonal communication ability group 8.94%, general group 63.01%, low group 28.05%. (2) Gender characteristics: male graduate students and heterosexual communication distress factor scores. The score of male emotional support factor was significantly lower than that of female (P 0.01). (3) Children structure characteristics: the total score of interpersonal communication ability and interpersonal care establishment, moderate refusal, self-suggestion factor score was significantly higher than that of non-only children (P 0.05, 0.01). (4) Family structure characteristics: emotional relationship of two-parent family graduate students. The scores of supporting factors were significantly higher than those of single parents and other families (P 0.05). (5) Characteristics of environmental adaptation: The scores of interpersonal distress and other factors of better-adapted postgraduates were significantly lower than those of poorer-adapted postgraduates (P 0.05, 0.01); the scores of interpersonal communication ability and other factors were significantly higher than those of poorer-adapted postgraduates (P 0.05, 0.01). Characteristics: The scores of interpersonal distress, interpersonal distress and interpersonal distress were significantly lower than those of arguing (P (8) Counselors'attitudinal characteristics: Counselors' total scores of interpersonal distress and conversational distress were significantly lower than those with less concern (P 0.05). (9) Students'attitudinal characteristics: students' total scores of interpersonal distress and conversational distress, communication distress and interpersonal distress and interpersonal distress and interpersonal distress and interpersonal distress and interpersonal distress and interpersonal distress and interpersonal distress and interpersonal distress and interpersonal Distr The scores were significantly lower than those of the less concerned (P 0.05, 0.01); the total scores of interpersonal communication ability and the scores of each factor were significantly higher than those of the less concerned postgraduates (P 0.05, 0.01). 3. 29.1% of the postgraduates with professional degrees believed that they needed mental health services according to the characteristics of their mental health needs. The main factors affecting the psychological problems of graduate students are the contradiction between study time and other activities time (54.0%), poor self-regulation ability (54.0%), economic problems (51.6%) and employment pressure (4.0%). Professional degree postgraduates think that the most suitable mental health service is to communicate with psychological professionals (58.2%), give lectures on mental health (55.2%), give individual psychological counseling (44.0%), read movies and television (37.3%) and network psychological counseling (33.6%). Postgraduates believe that the most important contents of mental health education are psychological contradictions and conflicts (61.9%), emotional and stress management (60.4%), interpersonal psychological adjustment (52.2%), psychological common sense (42.5%), marriage and love psychological adjustment (41.8%). According to the needs of mental health, a mental health education program for professional degree postgraduates was constructed by consulting experts, tutors and postgraduates. It contains 1-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators and 30 third-level indicators. Mental health of professional degree postgraduates should be paid attention to. 2. Mental health education of professional degree postgraduates should fully consider the differences and characteristics of their mental health needs. 3. Mental health education program for professional degree postgraduates includes 1-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators and 30 third-level indicators.
【学位授予单位】:第三军医大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G444
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘佳;许明星;;研究生社会期望与学业自我效能感的关系研究——以安徽师范大学为例[J];西昌学院学报(自然科学版);2016年04期
2 陈思思;郭欣雨;姜峰;;硕士生的自我接纳与特质焦虑:特质应对方式的中介作用[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2016年10期
3 朱研;李志平;;医学研究生应激与抑郁关系及自我和谐中介作用[J];中国公共卫生;2016年06期
4 杨雪花;陈万明;;不同心理压力对研究生身心健康的影响[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2016年05期
5 程余庆;;硕士研究生宿舍人际关系矛盾现状调查及对策研究[J];现代交际;2016年08期
6 王云波;聂小保;谭万春;万俊力;;研究生自我效能感提升研究[J];教育教学论坛;2016年04期
7 郭飞;;全日制专业学位与学术学位研究生心理压力因素对比研究——基于青岛农业大学的调查[J];高等农业教育;2015年10期
8 吉红;郭耿玉;;全日制专业学位硕士研究生就业问题浅析[J];中国青年社会科学;2015年05期
9 张俐;张霞;刘晓雨;靳灿灿;刘云波;王晓霞;;应激事件、负性思维和应对方式对研究生抑郁的预测及影响研究[J];江苏预防医学;2015年03期
10 杨巾夏;陈翠萍;段霞;贺学敏;李艳艳;张志英;蒋金;;护理专业学位硕士研究生职业期望与就业体验的质性研究[J];护理学杂志;2015年07期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 陈瑞安;杭州市社区卫生服务中心综合评价指标体系研究[D];浙江大学;2004年
,本文编号:2215473
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2215473.html