民国时期书法入门阶段教材研究
[Abstract]:As a special historical stage, the Republic of China has historical experience in calligraphy education, including the development of calligraphy teaching materials, which is worthy of our in-depth study and reflection, and is helpful for us to learn and learn from in the great environment of the new era. Based on the situation of calligraphy education in the Republic of China, this paper probes into the construction of calligraphy teaching materials in the entry stage of the Republic of China from the aspects of the concept, mode and development trend of calligraphy education in the Republic of China, and finds that the calligraphy textbooks of the Republic of China are mainly about character learning. It is based on the literacy education, and its teaching goal is to pursue the regularity and proficiency of writing in order to meet the needs of social production, but different from the traditional calligraphy education has higher requirements in calligraphy techniques. To meet the standard of imperial examination or to become an individual as a professional skill. This reflects the difference between calligraphy education and traditional calligraphy education in the Republic of China. It is the key content of this paper to sort out the evolution and development of the textbooks in the introductory stage of calligraphy in the Republic of China. We find that the construction and development of calligraphy textbooks in the Republic of China are affected by many factors: 1. The system of teaching materials in parallel with the national customization, the compilation of textbooks can not be effectively invested and guaranteed by the government. At the same time, it forms a relatively loose and free environment for the compilation of textbooks. Also caused the vast majority of calligraphy textbooks, mainly by the major private booksellers presided over the situation, so that the quality of teaching materials are uneven. 2. 2. There were different types of calligraphy education in the period of the Republic of China. The calligraphy textbooks used in school teaching are not only restricted by the various systems issued by the national educational administration department, but also affected by the changes in social demands. The use of calligraphy teaching materials under the calligraphy education mode such as calligraphy education mode, such as calligraphy teaching, is not fixed, but is mainly based on the calligraphy learning school as the main axis to select teaching materials with strong style. From the historical point of view, the main contributions of calligraphy textbooks of the Republic of China are as follows: first, the basic framework of modern calligraphy textbooks has been established. Second, strengthen the concept of combining literacy and character learning. Thirdly, the teaching steps of synthesizing Chinese characters are widely adopted to improve the writing quality of classified characters and make them more standardized. Taking history as a mirror, we also get some enlightenment from the calligraphy teaching materials in the introductory stage of the Republic of China: firstly, the contents of calligraphy textbooks should be synchronized with the students' literacy teaching contents. Due to the fact that the conversion of traditional Chinese characters is not smooth in the current students' Union, we should try our best to select the inherited characters in Chinese teaching as the main teaching contents in the introductory stage, and then gradually simplify them into complex ones. To lighten the burden of literacy and memory. Secondly, contemporary calligraphers participate in the construction of calligraphy textbooks for basic education, in order to improve the professional and scientific writing of calligraphy textbooks. Finally, we should see the shortage of imitating calligraphy textbooks in the Republic of China, and suggest that we should add more contents to children's creative interest and some calligraphy creative common sense in the current basic education textbooks.
【学位授予单位】:淮北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G529;J292.1-4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜武;沉舟侧畔千帆过——试论当代书坛对传统的继承兼说学院派书法[J];书画艺术;2000年06期
2 丁正;;书法硕士学位教育的现状和前景[J];书法之友;2000年02期
3 陆璐;;书法形式的意义[J];书法之友;2001年02期
4 黄映恺;;书法学科:现实透视与理想期待[J];福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年04期
5 洪亮;;民俗书法刍论[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年S1期
6 邹志生;蒋圣琥;;对当前书法批评的批评[J];湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年02期
7 陈则威;;加强中学书法教学促进素质教育发展[J];湖北成人教育学院学报;2010年02期
8 刘立士;;当代艺术学框架下的书法学体系与观念——平山观月《书法艺术学》简评[J];书法赏评;2011年02期
9 张层军;建立书法心理学刍议[J];赣南师范学院学报;1990年01期
10 刘立华;师专书法教学初探[J];滨州师专学报;1997年01期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 宗然;;初学书法谈[A];北京三希堂艺术院艺术家文集[C];2007年
2 李会;;浅谈如何创造书法艺术的意境之美[A];中国民间文化艺术之乡建设与发展初探[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 宗嫳;从书斋走向市场的书法艺术[N];中国教育报;2004年
2 沈鹏;书法的环境变异与持续发展[N];中国文化报;2005年
3 弘明;书法里外[N];中国图书商报;2000年
4 秦永龙;加强古文字书法的研究与探索[N];中国艺术报;2006年
5 刘建民;漫谈书法创作与书法美学价值[N];中国现代企业报;2008年
6 王渊清;创新——书法艺术的永恒主题[N];美术报;2008年
7 张海 全国政协常委;书法经典大家怎么出[N];光明日报;2010年
8 王岳川;30年“书法复兴运动”[N];中国文化报;2008年
9 王向峰;推动书法艺术创作的有力方式[N];沈阳日报;2010年
10 潘学聪;让书法成为坚实的现实存在[N];中国艺术报;2011年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 季琳琳;“技”与“艺”的转捩—20世纪中国高等书法艺术教育发展状态研究[D];中国美术学院;2016年
2 李放;苏轼书法思想研究[D];首都师范大学;2007年
3 章剑华;中国书法的现代构建[D];南京艺术学院;2010年
4 吴鹏;晚明士人生活中的书法世界[D];南京艺术学院;2008年
5 牛子;书法正体文字形态之沿革[D];中国美术学院;2012年
6 杨涛;东晋“新体”书法成因研究[D];中国艺术研究院;2010年
7 岳红记;北朝关中地区造像题记书法艺术研究[D];西安美术学院;2011年
8 肖文飞;开古今书法未有之奇境[D];中央美术学院;2008年
9 朱乐朋;乾嘉学者书法研究[D];首都师范大学;2007年
10 姚宇亮;“魏晋古法”源流析论[D];浙江大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李丽;基础教育阶段书法课程重构[D];江南大学;2009年
2 陈文瑞;小学书法教学研究[D];河北师范大学;2011年
3 秦泗帅;山东省中小学书法教育现状调查及对策研究[D];曲阜师范大学;2012年
4 宋红霞;新时期书法现象的研究[D];郑州大学;2015年
5 加华才老;甘南藏文书法研究[D];中央民族大学;2015年
6 曹萌;域外体验式书法教学方法探究[D];江西师范大学;2015年
7 张红军;书法景观文化对西安城市建设的影响研究[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
8 李昕;中国书法艺术博物馆公共教育模式及策略初探[D];中央美术学院;2016年
9 徐s,
本文编号:2318184
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2318184.html