当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 教育体制论文 >

宁夏生态移民青少年移居时间与行为问题关联分析

发布时间:2019-03-21 17:45
【摘要】:目的对不同移居时间的生态移民青少年行为问题及相关因素进行研究,为促进西部儿童心理健康发展提供依据。方法采用多阶段随机抽样方法,使用Achenbach儿童行为量表(家长版)(CBCL)、《我的班级》问卷(MCI)、家庭环境量表(FES-CV)对宁夏地区2 653名6~16岁生态移民儿童进行问卷调查。结果长期移民组男生社交问题和违纪问题(t值分别为-2.151,-1.983,P值均0.05)和女生躯体主诉和违纪问题(t值分别为-2.680,-2.605,P值均0.05)均低于短期移民组。男生长期移民组亲密度、成功性、组织性得分高于短期移民组(t值分别为2.340,2.688,2.069,P值均0.05),矛盾性、知识性得分低于短期移民组(t值分别为-2.309,-2.158,P值均0.05)。女生长期移民组亲密度得分高于、组织性得分低于短期移民组(t值分别为1.975,-2.213,P值均0.05)。男生长期移民组纪律与秩序得分高于短期移民组(t=3.223,P0.01);女生长期移民组纪律与秩序得分高于短期移民组(t=2.217,P0.05),且其师生关系得分显著高于短期移民组(t=3.330,P0.01)。逐步多元线性回归分析结果显示,影响长期移民组男生行为问题的家庭特征有矛盾性(β=0.307,P0.01),影响短期移民组男生行为问题的家庭特征有亲密度、组织性、矛盾性、情感表达、知识性(β值分别为-0.213,-0.206,0.161,-0.119,-0.111,P值均0.05)和班级环境的同学关系(β=-0.108,P0.05);影响长期移民组女生行为问题的家庭特征有亲密度(β=-0.275,P0.01)和班级环境的学习负担(β=0.259,P0.01),影响短期移民组女生行为问题的家庭特征是亲密度、矛盾性、独立性(β值分别为-0.210,0.171,0.099,P值均0.05)和班级环境的师生关系(β=-0.136,P0.01)。结论长期移民组行为问题总分及大部分因子均分较短期移民组呈下降趋势。随着迁移时间的推移,生态移民青少年对移居环境逐渐适应。
[Abstract]:Aim to study the behavioral problems and related factors of ecological immigrant adolescents with different migration time in order to provide evidence for promoting the mental health development of children in western China. Methods A multi-stage random sampling method was used. The Achenbach Child behavior scale () (CBCL), < my Class > questionnaire) (parent version (MCI),) was used. Family Environment scale (FES-CV) was used to investigate 2 653 6-year-old 16-year-old eco-immigrant children in Ningxia. Results Social problems and disciplinary problems (t =-2.151, P = 1.983, P = 0.05) and somatic complaints and disciplinary problems (t =-2.680, t =-2.605, t =-2.680, P < 0.05) were found in boys of long-term immigration group. All of them were lower than those of short-term emigration group (P < 0.05). The scores of affinity, success and organization of boys in long-term immigration group were higher than those in short-term immigration group (t = 2.340, 2.688,2.069, P < 0.05), and the scores of contradiction and knowledge were lower than those in short-term immigration group (t =-2.309, P < 0.01). -2.158, P = 0.05). The scores of affinity density were higher and the organizational scores were lower in the long-term immigrant group than in the short-term group (t = 1.975, P = 2.213, P < 0.05). The score of discipline and order in male long-term immigrant group was higher than that in short-term immigration group (t = 3.223, P0.01). The score of discipline and order in the long-term immigrant group was higher than that in the short-term immigration group (t = 2.217, P0.05), and the score of teacher-student relationship was significantly higher in the long-term immigrant group than in the short-term immigration group (t = 3.330, P0.01). The results of stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed that the family characteristics affecting boys' behavior problems in long-term immigration group were contradictory (尾 = 0.307, P0.01), and the family characteristics affecting boys' behavior problems in short-term immigration group had intimacy and organization. Contradictory, emotional expression and knowledge (尾 =-0.213, 0.206, 0.161, 0.119, 0.111, P = 0.05) and classmate relationship (尾 =-0.108, P0.05); The family characteristics affecting the behavior problems of girls in the long-term immigration group were intimacy (尾 =-0.275, P0.01) and the learning burden of the class environment (尾 = 0.259, P0.01). The family characteristics of the behavior problems in the short-term immigrant group were intimacy. Contradiction and independence (尾 =-0.210, 0.171, 0.099, P = 0.05) and teacher-student relationship in class environment (尾 =-0.136, P0.01). Conclusion the total score of behavioral problems and the average scores of most of the factors in the long-term immigrant group were lower than those in the short-term immigrant group. With the passage of migration time, ecological immigrant adolescents gradually adapt to the emigration environment.
【作者单位】: 江苏省苏州市广济医院;青岛市市立医院(集团)临床心理科;宁夏医科大学总医院心理卫生中心;宁夏医科大学;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金项目(81160172) 2015年宁夏研究生教育创新计划项目(NXYC201511)
【分类号】:G444

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 顾盛杉;家庭语言的"亲密度[J];现代交际;1998年05期

2 张向葵,张布和,王金凤,张树东;3-5~6-5岁儿童对丧失认知的初步研究[J];心理发展与教育;1999年04期

3 汤笑;;亲密度——判断婚姻现状的指标[J];心理与健康;2009年07期

4 Sean;;《太阁立志传Ⅴ》天下之道[J];软件;2004年05期

5 ;小动作泄露你们关系的亲密度[J];伴侣(B版);2010年06期

6 王玲,叶明志,赵耕源,梁超莲;653对中年夫妻婚姻现状及影响因素探讨[J];中国行为医学科学;1997年03期

7 ;您与情侣的亲密度如何?[J];校园心理;2007年12期

8 明天;;让沟通之水永葆清澈[J];家庭生活指南;2009年05期

9 ;情侣深情对视可以增进亲密度[J];幸福(情爱);2011年05期

10 ;5件小事,为爱爱加分[J];人生与伴侣(下半月版);2013年01期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 梁晓燕;黄燕;魏岚;;宿舍亲密度和适应性与大学生孤独感的关系研究[A];全国教育与心理统计测量学术年会论文摘要集[C];2006年

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 本报记者 张元章;父母如何教育“不听话”的孩子?[N];珠海特区报;2011年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 王永刚;以数据为中心的在线社会网络若干安全问题研究[D];北京大学;2013年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 谭景麟;基于社交关系图谱的移动社交设计研究[D];华南理工大学;2015年

2 李彤;亲社会花费对幸福感的影响:人际亲密度的边界作用[D];曲阜师范大学;2015年

3 张玉婷;基于等级反应模型和评定量表模型的青少年亲子关系亲密度量表编制[D];贵州师范大学;2016年

4 王俊力;恋人间实际亲密度对自我面孔优势效应的影响[D];西南大学;2016年

5 华烨;基于相对关系亲密度的局部社团发现算法研究[D];中国科学技术大学;2014年

6 霍丽婕;以增加亲密度为目的的会话分析[D];复旦大学;2013年

7 曹坤宇;基于亲密度及影响力的微博社交兴趣圈挖掘算法研究[D];天津大学;2013年

8 王伟伟;人际亲密度对自我道德行为的影响[D];宁波大学;2014年

9 赵天宸;彩印SNS用户亲密度模型的设计与实现[D];北京邮电大学;2013年

10 张聪;微博用户关注推荐及排名策略研究[D];郑州大学;2012年



本文编号:2445170

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyutizhilunwen/2445170.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户18774***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com