“理论与实践相统一”——六十年来中国的教育学话语史论

发布时间：2018-01-03 12:08

本文关键词：“理论与实践相统一”——六十年来中国的教育学话语史论　出处：《社会科学战线》2009年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："理论与实践相统一"是新中国教育和教育学的基本话语之一。"文革"及其以前,以一元化体制为前提,其主要学术功能是用"元理论"来整肃意识形态,重塑知识谱系,确立"社会主义教育"的自我优越意识。这又是一种以国家为单一主体的理论话语,它排斥一切社会或个人主体的学术创造努力,最终使"元理论"成了彻底的教条主义和经验主义。改革开放以来,通过教育学史和元教育学探究,通过回到教育学知识和教育学实践本身去寻找、确立自主理论基础,中国的教育学摆脱了对于"元理论"的依附。随着市场经济的深入,中国的文化选择和创造主体从单元走向多元,教育研究主体的自我定位和立场也多元化了。"理论与实践相统一",也通过进一步追问"谁的理论与谁的实践相统一"、"什么样的理论与什么样的实践相统一",获得了更加丰富而深刻的内涵。
[Abstract]:"the unity of theory and practice" is one of the basic discourses of education and pedagogy in New China. Before the Cultural Revolution, the monistic system was taken as the premise, and its main academic function was to purge ideology with "meta-theory". Reinventing the knowledge pedigree and establishing the self-superiority consciousness of "socialist education" is also a kind of theoretical discourse with the country as the single subject, which rejects the academic creative efforts of all social or individual subjects. Since the reform and opening up, through the history of pedagogy and meta-pedagogy, through the return to pedagogy knowledge and pedagogy practice itself to find out. With the deepening of the market economy, China's cultural choice and creative subjects have moved from unit to element. The self-orientation and position of educational research subjects are also diversified. "Theory and practice are United", and "whose theory and whose practice are United" is also asked further. "what kind of theory and what kind of practice are United", has gained richer and deeper connotation.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学教育历史与文化研究院;
【基金】：全国教育科学“十一五”规划国家一般课题(BAA090012)
【分类号】：G521
【正文快照】： 题解中华人民共和国建立60年来,中国的教育和教育学都发生了巨大变化。由于其间的教育理论纷纭复杂、变化多端,作为新中国教育学演变的历史回顾,本文不拟面面俱到,而将以“理论与实践相统一”这一命题为中心,以知识与社会的相互建构为视角,以话语分析为手段,呈现新中国不同阶

【参考文献】