教育评估中介的价值需求与法理分析——以上海市教育评估院为例

发布时间：2018-01-11 18:21

本文关键词：教育评估中介的价值需求与法理分析——以上海市教育评估院为例　出处：《中国行政管理》2009年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：阿罗指出变革必有成本,组织在最需要变迁时常常反过来强化其现有结构。包括上海市教育评估院在内的众多中介组织目前的状况便是如此,用行政内部委托方式所建的组织仍然是政府的隶属机构,并没有独立法人的地位;而评估对象即学校或某种制度设施也没有区别于以往被动接受行政检查的新的评估需求;这种异化透露了计划体制下科层制机关扩张的特征,甚至带有评估交易的机会主义危险。随着"国家/社会"二元意识的唤起,自治组织正在慢慢成长,这些年来教育评估业务正是依赖了大学及其教授的专业力量,由此,人们看到一种既尊重传统行政习惯又尊重专业能力的方式,在既有组织框架下,专业细分,推行评价项目委托合同制专业联盟的新模型。
[Abstract]:Arrow points out that change comes with costs, and that organizations often reinforce their existing structures when they are most in need of change, as is the case with many intermediary organizations, including the Shanghai Institute of Education and Evaluation. The organization set up by the way of administrative internal entrustment is still the subordinate organ of the government, and it does not have the status of independent legal person. The evaluation object, that is, the school or some kind of institutional facilities, is not different from the new assessment needs of passively accepting administrative inspection in the past; This alienation reveals the characteristics of the expansion of the branch system under the planning system, and even carries the opportunistic danger of evaluating transactions. With the evoking of the dual consciousness of "state / society", autonomous organizations are slowly growing up. Over the years, educational evaluation has relied on the professional strength of universities and their professors. Thus, people see a way to respect both traditional administrative habits and professional competence, in the framework of the existing organization, professional segmentation. Carry out the new model of consignment contract professional alliance of evaluation project.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：上海市教育评估院立项课题的部分研究成果项目号:沪教评2007000《“第三部门”的建构与效用:评估主体的资质、任务与评估程序研究》
【分类号】：G527
【正文快照】： 一、政府意志:中介及其“行政内生”属性公共领域中介组织的发生、发展既是社会的进步,也是政府自身机构改革或新的“建制”行为的表现。对当下包括教育评估在内的种种中介性机构进行考察,可以看到政府要求变革的意志更为明显,而社会诉求往往只是理论上的舆论罢了。正如下面

【参考文献】