CNKI视角下国内移动学习研究现状分析

发布时间：2019-02-24 13:42

【摘要】：运用内容分析法和文献计量法,对2000～2009年中国知网(CNKI)数据库移动学习文献的年度分布、作者情况、研究方法、期刊分布、文献内容、引文等进行统计分析,结果表明,中国移动学习研究已经积累了一定数量的研究成果。从文献年度发表数量上看,文献量逐年增加,呈现稳定上升趋势。但研究人员多而散,长期致力于该领域研究的作者数量少,因此很难产生影响力大的研究成果。从研究内容上看,理论研究一直占有绝对优势,技术研究呈现上升趋势,然而对课程资源的设计与开发显得比较稀缺。从研究方法看,当前研究仍然带有很强的主观性和随意性,但是研究越来越多地采用规范的研究方法,研究将日益科学化。从来源期刊看,移动学习研究论文比较分散,研究泛而不精,缺乏权威期刊对该领域长期持续的关注。从引文看,中外文引文数量差异很大,对国外的成功案例分析较少,亦缺少中外比较研究。
[Abstract]:By using the method of content analysis and bibliometrics, this paper makes a statistical analysis of the annual distribution, author, research method, periodical distribution, literature content and citation of mobile learning documents in the (CNKI) database of China from 2000 to 2009. The results show that: 1. China mobile learning research has accumulated a certain number of research results. In terms of the number of annual publications, the number of documents increased year by year, showing a steady upward trend. But there are a lot of researchers and a small number of authors working in this field for a long time, so it is difficult to produce influential research results. From the point of view of the research content, the theoretical research has been an absolute advantage, the technical research has been on the rise, but the design and development of curriculum resources is relatively scarce. From the point of view of the research methods, the current research still has strong subjectivity and randomness, but more and more research methods are adopted, and the research will be more scientific. From the source journals, mobile learning research papers are scattered, the research is extensive but not refined, and the authoritative journals pay more and more attention to this field for a long time. From the citation point of view, the number of Chinese and foreign citations is quite different, the analysis of foreign successful cases is less, and the comparative study between China and foreign countries is also lacking.
【作者单位】：集美大学教师教育学院;
【分类号】：G434

【参考文献】