科研机构与高校知识创新协同研究

发布时间：2018-01-08 04:21

本文关键词：科研机构与高校知识创新协同研究　出处：《华中科技大学》2012年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着全球科技竞争日益加剧,知识创新体系自身的综合性与复杂性越来越高,科研机构不得不处理多学科相互交织、多种知识相互融合的复杂技术问题。科研机构和高校知识创新协同是适应技术变化环境、处理复杂技术问题、实现知识共享与创新、加快知识应用与扩散、以及提升创新能力的最佳策略。大量事实表明,推进我国科研机构与高校知识创新协同,已成为推动国家创新体系建设所亟需研究的课题。因此,以科研机构与高校知识创新协同为研究主题,进行了尝试性的研究工作。本研究在系统综述国内外相关研究成果的基础上,综合运用博弈经济学理论、知识管理理论与技术创新理论等理论,并用规范分析、实证分析和案例分析等研究方法,对科研机构与高校知识创新协同的特征与模式、模式选择、影响因素及差异性、以及运行效果进行了深入研究。基于以上研究论证工作,得出以下主要结论与观点：首先,科研机构与高校知识创新协同的模式归纳为科研项目合作协议及合作共建研究实验室(所)两种模式。经济学模型研究表明,与科研项目合作协议模式相比,科研机构与高校共建实验室(所)的知识创新协同模式经济效率相对较高,特别是在高知识溢出、知识溢出增加合作体整体收益之时。但并不能否定合作协议模式的现实广泛存在性。其次,吸收能力与整合能力对科研机构与高校知识创新协同具有积极作用,且在两种不同模式下具有差异性。知识识别能力对管理创新有显著正向影响；知识获取能力对成果创新、过程创新及管理创新有显著正向影响；内化能力与管理创新有显著正向影响；结合能力对成果创新和过程创新有显著正向影响；社会化能力对管理创新有显著正向影响。在科研项目合作协议模式下,吸收能力的影响较强,且识别、获取能力对知识创新均有显著影响,整合能力中仅有结合能力对成果创新、过程创新有显著影响；在共建实验室(所)模式下,整合能力的影响较强,知识获取能力对过程及管理创新有显著影响,内化、结合能力对成果及过程创新有影响,内化、社会化能力对管理创新有显著影响。最后,从研究水平与贡献、队伍建设与人才培养、开放交流与运行管理三维度构建知识创新协同模式的运行效果指标体系,以层次分析法为指标设置权重,以灰关联分析法进行效果评估,并借助实例演示为知识创新协同的运行效果评估提供一个较客观和公平的方式。
[Abstract]:With the increasing global competition in science and technology, knowledge innovation system itself is becoming more and more comprehensive and complex, scientific research institutions have to deal with multi-disciplinary interweaving. Scientific research institutions and colleges and universities cooperate in knowledge innovation to adapt to the changing environment of technology, to deal with complex technical problems, to achieve knowledge sharing and innovation, and to accelerate the application and diffusion of knowledge. A large number of facts show that promoting the coordination of scientific research institutions and university knowledge innovation has become an urgent research topic in the construction of national innovation system. Based on the research theme of collaboration between scientific research institutions and knowledge innovation in colleges and universities, a tentative research work was carried out. On the basis of a systematic review of relevant research results at home and abroad, this study synthetically applies the theories of game economics, knowledge management and technological innovation, and makes normative analysis. Empirical analysis and case study methods, to the scientific research institutions and colleges and universities knowledge innovation collaborative characteristics and models, mode selection, influencing factors and differences. Based on the above research work, the following main conclusions and viewpoints are obtained: First of all, the cooperative model of scientific research institutions and universities' knowledge innovation can be summarized into two modes: cooperation agreement of scientific research projects and co-construction of research laboratories. Compared with the cooperative agreement model of scientific research projects, the cooperative mode of knowledge innovation between scientific research institutions and universities is relatively efficient, especially in high knowledge spillover. Knowledge spillover can not negate the widespread existence of cooperative agreement model. Secondly, the absorptive ability and the integration ability have positive effect on the collaboration of scientific research institutions and universities' knowledge innovation, and there are differences in two different modes, and the ability of knowledge recognition has a significant positive impact on management innovation. Knowledge acquisition ability has a significant positive impact on achievement innovation, process innovation and management innovation; Internalization ability and management innovation have significant positive influence; Combining ability has significant positive influence on achievement innovation and process innovation; Social ability has a significant positive impact on management innovation. In the model of scientific research project cooperation agreement, absorptive capacity has a strong impact, and recognition, acquisition ability has a significant impact on knowledge innovation. In the integration ability, only the combination ability has a significant impact on the achievement innovation, and the process innovation has a significant impact; In the co-construction of laboratory (institute) mode, integration ability has a strong impact, knowledge acquisition ability has a significant impact on process and management innovation, internalization, combined with the results and process innovation has an impact, internalization. The socialization ability has the remarkable influence to the management innovation. Finally, from the research level and contribution, team building and talent training, open communication and operational management of three dimensions to build a collaborative model of knowledge innovation of the operational effectiveness of the index system, with the Analytic hierarchy process as the index to set up the weight. The grey relational analysis method is used to evaluate the effect, and an example demonstration is given to provide a more objective and fair way for the evaluation of the operation effect of knowledge innovation cooperation.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G644

【引证文献】