人才评价模式的校企差异研究

发布时间：2018-01-14 17:23

本文关键词：人才评价模式的校企差异研究　出处：《东华大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：人才评价是指运用先进的科学技术和手段,对各类人才的知识水平、能力极其倾向、工作技能、发展潜力实时测量和评价的人事管理活动。大学阶段,是从学校向社会过渡的关键时期。近年来,大学生就业问题越来越严峻,同时,很多企业表示招聘压力大,很难找到非常合适的人才,以致人才招聘成本越来越高,因此,我们不得不考虑高校人才培养与企业用人需求匹配度的问题,也就是企业和高校对于人才评价模式的选择是否相匹配。我们的研究目标是：首先,基于胜任特征模型,通过行为事例访谈、开放式访谈等方式得出高校和企业对于大学生胜任特征的主要维度,形成胜任特征编码辞典,并进行大学生胜任特征问卷编制。其次,对比高校和企业对于大学生胜任特征各维度的重视程度的不同,分析得出高校和企业对于大学生评价的侧重点的差异。最后,分析二者侧重点差异,讨论产生该差异的原因,并分析得出大学生人才评价模式校企差异对于校企的启示,为企业和高校提供参考。本文的研究方法主要如下,通过行为事例访谈、开放式访谈等方式得出大学生胜任特征辞典,并对辞典进行筛选,之后编制形成《大学生胜任特征问卷》。先在小范围内进行预调研,并进行信度检验和效度检验,信效度检验通过后,由高校和企业不同群体的人来进行问卷调研,根据问卷结果运用SPSS软件进行分析,通过描述性统计、分布统计得出问卷群体等的分布情况,研究其样本选择的科学性。通过不同群体数据的参数检验来考察高校、企业对于大学生胜任特征各维度选择的不同,进而进行下一步分析。通过本文的研究,共得出以下几个成果：首先,形成了《大学生胜任特征指标体系》并编制了大学生胜任特征问卷。其次,通过问卷调查、SPSS软件进行分析,得出校企人才评价差异有以下几个方面：一、高校和企业对于大学生胜任特征的内容构成上有很大的差异。其中差异显著的几项有：知识广度、专业实践能力、遵守职业道德、分析与解决问题能力、应变能力、全球意识与社会意识、创新意识与能力、坚韧性。高校人员认为,大学生胜任特征中最重要的三项分别是遵守职业道德、自我意识、创新意识和能力。而重要程度最低的三项分别是知识广度、分析与解决问题的能力、市场开拓能力。高校人员认为遵守职业道德、全球意识与社会意识、创新意识与能力、坚韧性等大学生胜任特征的重要性要显著高于企业人员。企业人员认为,大学生胜任特征中最重要的三项分别是团队协作能力、自我意识、专业实践能力。而重要程度最低的三项分别是市场开拓能力、领导能力、全球意识与社会意识。企业人员认为知识广度、专业实践能力、分析与解决问题能力、应变能力等大学生胜任特征的重要性要显著高于高校人员。二、企业人员对知识这一维度的重要性认识要高于高校人员。高校人员的观点中其他个人特征这一维度的重要性高于企业人员的观点。而在技能和能力这两个大因子中,无明显规律。最后,总结以上结论,本文分析讨论了以上现象形成的原因,并根据以上结论分别对企业和高校提出了建议。
[Abstract]:Talent evaluation refers to the use of advanced technology and means for all kinds of talents knowledge, skills, ability and tendencies, the development potential of real-time measurement and evaluation of personnel management activities. The university stage is a critical period of transition from school to society. In recent years, college students employment problem is becoming more and more serious, at the same time, a lot of companies that recruit pressure, very difficult to find the right person, so that the recruitment cost more and more high, therefore, we have to consider the university personnel training needs matching problem and the enterprise, is the choice for talent evaluation model of enterprises and universities matches.
Our research aims are:
First, based on competency model, through behavioral case interviews, open-ended interviews and other ways, we get the main dimensions of University and enterprise's competency for college students, form competency dictionary, and prepare the competency questionnaire for college students.
Secondly, the difference between University and enterprise in different dimensions of College Students' competency is analyzed.
Finally, we analyze the differences between the two points, discuss the reasons for the difference, and analyze the Enlightenment of university talent evaluation mode, school enterprise difference, school enterprise, and provide reference for enterprises and universities.
The main research methods of this paper are as follows, through behavioral event interview, open-ended interviews showed the students' competency dictionary, and the dictionary was compiled after screening, the formation of "College Students' competency questionnaire. Pre survey in a small area, and check the reliability and validity, reliability and validity after by the University and enterprises of different groups of people to a questionnaire survey, according to the questionnaire results using SPSS software were analyzed by descriptive statistics, distribution statistics questionnaire groups, scientific research and the sample selection. To investigate the parameters of the test data for different groups, enterprises choose the dimensions of College Students' competence of different characteristics, and for the next step of analysis.
Through the study of this paper, the following results are obtained:
First, the college students' competency index system was formed and the competency questionnaire for college students was compiled.
Secondly, through the questionnaire survey and the analysis of SPSS software, there are the following aspects: the differences of the evaluation of the school and enterprise talents are as follows:
A, universities and enterprises have great differences in the content of the student competence characteristics. Several of which have significant differences: the breadth of knowledge, professional practice ability, abide by the occupation ethics, analysis and problem solving ability, strain capacity, global awareness and social consciousness, innovation consciousness and ability and tenacity.
The researchers believe that the most important feature of College Students' competence in three are to comply with the occupation morality, self consciousness, innovation consciousness and ability. And the three least important are breadth of knowledge, ability to analyze and solve problems, the ability to open up the market. University researchers that abide by the occupation ethics, global awareness and social consciousness, innovation consciousness and ability, tenacity and other students competency was significantly higher than the enterprise personnel.
Enterprise staff believes that the most important feature of College Students' competence in three are the team cooperation ability, self consciousness, professional practice ability. And the three least important is marketing ability, leadership ability, global awareness and social consciousness. The enterprise staff think knowledge breadth, professional practice ability, ability to analyze and solve the problems. The staff was significantly higher than the importance of ability of College Students' competence characteristics.
Two, the importance of knowledge dimension for employees is higher than that of university staff. The importance of other personal characteristics is higher than that of corporate staff. But there are no obvious rules in two factors, skills and abilities.
In the end, the above conclusions are summarized, and the reasons for the above phenomena are analyzed and discussed, and some suggestions are put forward to the enterprises and colleges and universities according to the above conclusions.

【学位授予单位】：东华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：F272.92;G647.38

【参考文献】