提升公信力:本科评估中的信息公开及参与协商

发布时间：2018-05-03 19:16

本文选题：公信力 + 本科评估　；参考：《现代大学教育》2012年06期

【摘要】：公信力反映了公众对教育评估的广泛认同、普遍尊重和系统信任。首轮本科教学工作水平评估的公信力较低,很大程度上与评估信息公开的程度不足及参与协商机制的缺失有关。信息公开影响师生及公众的知情、参与和协商,并决定着对评估的监督效力,影响评估的形象与声誉,信息公开与参与协商改变着评估的范式,影响评估的专业化水平。信息公开及参与协商对于评估公信力水平的提升具有重要意义。制定信息公开的执行标准,自觉构建评估参与及协商机制,落实信息公开及参与协商的工作机制并纳入元评估方案中,是当前教育评估程序改进及策略选择的重要方面。
[Abstract]:Public credibility reflects widespread public recognition, universal respect and systematic trust in educational evaluation. The credibility of the first round of undergraduate teaching evaluation is relatively low, which is largely related to the lack of information disclosure and the lack of consultation mechanism. Information disclosure affects the knowledge, participation and negotiation of teachers and students and the public, and determines the effectiveness of supervision, the image and reputation of evaluation, and the openness of information and participation in consultation change the paradigm of evaluation and affect the professional level of evaluation. Information openness and participation in consultation are of great significance to the evaluation of the level of credibility. It is an important aspect for the improvement of educational evaluation procedure and the choice of strategies to formulate the implementation standard of information disclosure, to construct the mechanism of evaluation participation and consultation, to implement the working mechanism of information disclosure and participation consultation and to incorporate it into the meta-evaluation scheme.
【作者单位】：山东大学高等教育研究中心;华东师范大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：华东师范大学2011年校级“博士研究生学术新人奖”资助,项目编号:XRZZ2011025
【分类号】：G649.21

【相似文献】