我国大学学术委员会职能研究

发布时间：2018-05-12 00:24

本文选题：学术权力 + 行政权力　；参考：《扬州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：《中华人民共和国高等教育法》(后简称《高教法》)明文规定：高等学校设立学术委员会,审议和评定学术事务,参与大学管理,但经过调查研究发现,《高教法》对学术委员会的职能规定已经不再能适应高等教育的发展和社会发展的需要,在实际运行中存在种种问题。通过重新对大学学术委员会相关概念的梳理及理论根据的分析,得出建立大学学术委员会的必要性,它是教授治学的集中体现,是促进学科发展、学术民主管理的良好形式,但大学学术委员会在履行职能的过程中出现了行政化倾向明显,职权不明晰,人员产生的方式不甚合理等现象,其职能受到了种种限制。这些情况都违背了学术委员会作为学术管理组织的内在运行规律,其原因在于我国特定的文化背景和大学历史发展的短暂性,传统高等教育管理体制的限制,相关法律法规建设的落后,加上高等教育自身发展的复杂性,因此,学术委员会的权力式微,不能很好地促进学术自由和教授治校,学术权力的合法性和可操作性在实践中难以体现,无法发挥学术管理应有的作用。鉴于美国加州大学教授会与我国大学学术委员会的众多相通之处,在从其现状、结构、职责、运作等进行分析后,找出加州大学教授会彰显学术权力的途径,以及在加州大学运作的过程中所发挥的积极作用等,挖掘出对我国高等教育管理的有益启示：打破校级集权管理模式,完善二元化管理结构,以及完善学术拨款和资源分配制度。总之,在结合我国大学学术委员会的现状,同时借鉴加州大学经验的基础上,大学学术委员会可以从制度保障的加强入手,包括法律、大学学术委员会章程的完善等,加强理论研究,进一步完善组织结构,发挥学术力量在高校管理的中的作用,从而彰显学术权力。
[Abstract]:The Law on higher Education of the people's Republic of China (hereafter referred to as "the Law on higher Education") expressly stipulates that institutions of higher learning shall set up academic committees, review and assess academic affairs, participate in the management of universities, However, through investigation and study, it is found that the functions of the higher Education Law can no longer meet the needs of the development of higher education and social development, and there are various problems in the actual operation. The necessity of establishing a university academic committee, which is a concentrated embodiment of academic research by professors and a good form of promoting discipline development and academic democratic management, is obtained by combing the relevant concepts and theoretical basis of the academic committee again. However, in the process of performing its functions, the academic committee of the university appears the obvious tendency of administration, the lack of clarity of authority and authority, and the unreasonable way of producing personnel, etc., and its functions are restricted by various kinds of restrictions. All these situations violate the inherent running rule of academic committee as an academic management organization. The reasons lie in the specific cultural background of our country, the transitory development of university history, the restriction of traditional higher education management system. Due to the backward construction of relevant laws and regulations and the complexity of the development of higher education itself, the power of the academic Council has declined, and it has not been able to promote academic freedom and the administration of schools by professors. The legitimacy and maneuverability of academic power are difficult to embody in practice and can not play the proper role of academic management. In view of the many similarities between the University of California professors and the academic committees of our universities, after analyzing the current situation, structure, duties and operations, we can find out the ways in which professors at the University of California can demonstrate academic power. As well as the positive role played in the operation of the University of California, the beneficial enlightenment to the management of higher education in our country has been excavated: breaking the mode of centralized management at the university level, perfecting the dualized management structure, and so on. And improve the academic allocation and resource allocation system. In a word, on the basis of the current situation of the university academic committee in our country and the experience of the University of California, the university academic committee can start with the strengthening of the system guarantee, including the perfection of the law and the constitution of the university academic committee, etc. Strengthen the theoretical research, further improve the organizational structure, give play to the role of academic power in the management of colleges and universities, thereby showing academic power.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G644.6;G647.1

【参考文献】