关于高等学校哲学社会科学研究评价的思考

发布时间：2018-06-07 07:54

本文选题：高等学校 + 哲学社会科学　；参考：《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年01期

【摘要】：中国高等学校作为我国哲学社会科学战线最重要的力量,在认识世界、传承文明、创新理论、咨政育人、服务社会等方面,已经作出了重要贡献。但由于功利主义利益驱动和成果评价体系的不健全,高等学校哲学社会科学理论研究与现实结合不紧,移植性、诠释性、解释性居多,创新成果不足,研究潜力、实力和效力发挥不够。其中原因固然很多,但成果评价是其重要因素之一。因此,如何科学、客观、公正地评价哲学社会科学研究成果,如何建立和完善哲学社会科学研究成果的评价机制、评价标准和评价体系,已经成为当前哲学社会科学发展刻不容缓的、必须解决的重大理论和现实问题。回顾国内哲学社会科学成果评价的现状并对美国、英国、芬兰等国研究评价案例进行剖析后可以得出结论:从哲学社会科学研究质量导向原则、哲学社会科学研究评价主体、规范哲学社会科学研究评价标准、实施哲学社会科学研究差别化评价、建立健全诚信公正的评价制度等几个方面,探讨如何做好我国高等学校哲学社会科学研究成果评价的做法,可以更好地拓展新的思路,提升研究质量,促进高等学校哲学社会科学进一步繁荣发展。
[Abstract]:As the most important force in the field of philosophy and social science, Chinese colleges and universities have made important contributions in understanding the world, inheriting civilization, innovating theory, educating people with government, serving the society and so on. However, due to the impelling of utilitarianism and the imperfect evaluation system of achievements, the theoretical research of philosophy and social sciences in colleges and universities is not tightly combined with reality, and it has the characteristics of transplantation, interpretation, insufficient innovative achievements and research potential. Strength and effectiveness are inadequate. There are many reasons, but the outcome evaluation is one of its important factors. Therefore, how to evaluate the research results of philosophy and social sciences scientifically, objectively and impartially, how to establish and perfect the evaluation mechanism, the evaluation criteria and the evaluation system of the research results of philosophy and social sciences, It has become an important theoretical and practical problem that must be solved in the development of philosophy and social science. Reviewing the present situation of domestic philosophy and social science achievements evaluation and analyzing the case studies of the United States, Britain, Finland and other countries, we can draw a conclusion: from the philosophy and social science research quality oriented principle, philosophy and social science research evaluation main body, Standardizing the evaluation standard of philosophy and social science research, implementing the differential evaluation of philosophy and social science research, establishing and perfecting the evaluation system of honesty and fairness, etc. How to evaluate the research results of philosophy and social sciences in colleges and universities in China is discussed, which can better expand new ideas, improve the quality of research and promote the further prosperity and development of philosophy and social sciences in colleges and universities.
【作者单位】：西南大学经济管理学院;
【基金】：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“提高哲学社会科学社会服务能力研究”(10JZD0005),首席专家:王志章
【分类号】：G644

【参考文献】