贫困大学新生心理健康与社会支持应对方式的关系

发布时间：2018-03-17 22:30

本文选题：精神卫生　切入点：社会支持　出处：《中国学校卫生》2013年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的了解贫困大学新生的心理健康状况及其与社会支持和应对方式的关系,为培养贫困生积极健康的心理素质提供依据。方法对整群抽取的皖南医学院2012级219名贫困新生及460名非贫困新生,采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)、特质应对方式量表(TCSQ)和社会支持评定量表(SSRS)进行调查。结果贫困新生SCL-90得分除躯体化和其他2项因子外,其余8项因子得分均高于非贫困新生(P值均0.05);贫困新生心理健康状况性别间差异均无统计学意义(P值均0.05)。贫困新生和非贫困新生在应对方式的2个因子得分上差异无统计学意义(P值均0.05);在社会支持的3个因子中,主观支持和客观支持得分贫困新生均低于非贫困新生(P值均0.05)。多重线性回归分析显示,影响贫困新生心理健康的主要因素为消极应对和支持利用度两因子。结论贫困新生的心理健康状况较差。采取消极应对方式是影响贫困大学生心理健康的负性因素,积极利用支持是促进心理健康的正性因素。
[Abstract]:Objective to understand the mental health status of poor university freshmen and its relationship with social support and coping style. Methods 219 poor freshmen and 460 non-poor freshmen were selected from South Anhui Medical College in 2012. Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), trait coping style scale (TCSQ) and Social support rating scale (SSRS) were used. Results the SCL-90 scores of poor freshmen were not only somatization but also 2 other factors. The scores of the other 8 factors were higher than those of the non-poor freshmen (P = 0.05), the mental health status of the poor freshmen had no statistical significance (P = 0.05). The scores of the poor freshmen and the non-poor freshmen were lower than those of the non-poor freshmen in coping style. Among the three factors of social support, The scores of subjective support and objective support were lower than those of non-poor freshmen (P < 0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that, The main factors influencing the mental health of poor freshmen are negative coping and supportive utilization. Conclusion the mental health status of poor freshmen is poor. Negative coping style is a negative factor affecting the mental health of poor college students. Active use of support is a positive factor to promote mental health.
【作者单位】：皖南医学院预防医学系;
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】