告别夏楚二物:中国教育废除体罚的百年努力及论争

发布时间：2018-04-02 10:11

本文选题：传统教育　切入点：朴作教刑　出处：《湖南师范大学教育科学学报》2013年02期

【摘要】："朴作教刑"是中国先民提出的,尔后成为教育上的一种指导思想;汉儒又从实践中总结出"夏楚二物,收其威也"的经验;宋儒再提出"教不严、师之惰"的绝对论调,经过历代的传诵,以至于传统教育离不开体罚,似乎无体罚则无教育,不知误导了多少家长,害苦了多少儿童。这一切到了清末兴学,才有些许改观,此后民国,进而共和国,民主教育的实施使其越发消退。从"倚重"到"怀疑",从"收威"到"示威",从"可施"到"不得",是体罚与中国教育这百年来变化的主要特征。另一方面,它的所指也在不断扩大,证明人们观念的不断进步。简而言之,这一路走来步履有点蹒跚,颇为不易。
[Abstract]:"Park as a teacher of punishment" was put forward by Chinese ancestors and later became a guiding ideology in education; the Han Confucianism summed up the experience of "Xia Chu two things, to gain their power" from practice; and Song Confucianism again put forward the absolute argument that "teaching is not strict and teachers are lazy." After successive generations of recitation, so that traditional education can not be separated from corporal punishment, it seems that without corporal punishment, there is no education, I do not know how many parents misled, hurt how many children. All this until the end of the Qing Dynasty to start school, only a little change, since then the Republic of China, and then the Republic, The implementation of democratic education has made it more and more subdued. From "relying heavily" to "doubt", from "gaining prestige" to "demonstrating", from "can be applied" to "not being allowed" are the main characteristics of corporal punishment and the changes in Chinese education over the past hundred years. On the other hand, What it means is also expanding, testifying to the constant progress of people's ideas. In short, it's a bit of a stumble and not easy to walk along the way.
【作者单位】：浙江大学教育学系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题“中国师道之研究”[COA120173]
【分类号】：G40-092

【参考文献】