大陆和香港小学语文教材中男性人物形象比较研究
本文选题:男性人物形象 + 比较研究 ; 参考:《上海师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:人物形象是课文的重要组成部分。尤其在语文教材中,课文离不开人物形象开展故事和推动情节,人物形象更对学生起着“榜样”作用。因此,人物形象是教材编选者借以传递知识和体现教育要求的重要手段。在前期,学者们研究发现教材中男女形象比例严重失调。男性人物形象数量多,地位高。编选者在编排教材时必定慎重权衡、选择其各方面要素。因此选入教材中的男性人物形象一定具有某些特点和价值取向,这是研究语文教材的一个比较新颖的切入点。本论文以“男性人物形象”作为研究对象,选择香港与大陆两套语文教材进行对比研究。大陆版教材选的是2016年人教版出版的小学六个年级的语文教材(共12册),香港版教材选的是2011年初版“我爱学语文”系列小学六个年级的语文教材(共24册)。本研究首先运用文献法针对前期学者有关人物形象研究的文献资料进行整理,缩小研究范围,建立本研究的分析框架,具体包括男性人物形象的“虚实形象”、“外在形象”和“内在形象”。然后,将虚实形象分为形象泛指、真实形象和虚构形象;将外在形象分为年龄、国别、职业和时代四个类目;将内在形象结合道德因素,再具化为男性人物的道德形象。通过频度统计法针对以上三个大类进行频度统计,通过有关数据进行分析,从而比较两套教材的异同。最后,结合自身实习经验和得出的比较结论为教师和教材编选者提出教学和编选方面的个人建议。全文分为六大部分:绪论;第一部分──两套教材中男性人物形象的分析框架;第二部分──两套教材中男性人物形象的数量统计与虚实分析;第三部分──两套教材中男性人物形象的外在形象分析;第四部分──两套教材中男性人物的内在形象分析;第五部分──两套教材中男性人物形象比较研究带来的启示。通过上述统计分析,本人发现两套教材在男性人物形象选取和安排方面既存在共性,也存在一定的区别。最明显的公共点体现在两套教材都偏重选取与学生年龄相仿的少年儿童作为课文的主要主角;最显著的差异则在于人教版更重于英雄人物和政治人物的选取,更重“历史性”和“传统性”,而香港版则立足实际,更重“现代性”和“生活化”。教师在授课时可以根据同类型人物或同主题对教材中男性人物进行整理便于教学。教材编选者也应结合时代发展,立足现代小学生的成长特点及时对教材编选内容进行更新。两套教材基于各自的历史和文化背景,各有可取之处。
[Abstract]:Character image is an important part of the text. Especially in the Chinese teaching material, the text can not be separated from the character image to develop the story and promote the plot, the character image plays the role of "example" to the student. Therefore, character image is an important means for textbook editors to transfer knowledge and embody educational requirements. In the early stage, scholars found that the ratio of male and female images in textbooks is seriously misaligned. The number of male figures is large and the status is high. The editor must weigh carefully and choose all aspects of the textbook. Therefore, the male characters selected in the textbooks must have some characteristics and value orientation, which is a relatively new breakthrough point in the study of Chinese teaching materials. This thesis takes male figure image as the research object, and chooses Hong Kong and mainland Chinese teaching materials to carry on the contrast research. The mainland edition is a language textbook for six grades of primary schools published by the people's Education Edition in 2016 (12 volumes), while the Hong Kong version is selected for the first edition of the "I Love Learning Chinese" series in 2011 (24 copies). This research first uses the literature method to carry on the collation to the early scholar regarding the figure image research literature material, reduces the research scope, establishes this research analysis frame, specifically includes the male figure image "the false reality image", "external image" and "internal image". Then, the image of virtual reality is divided into four categories: image, real image and fictional image; external image is divided into four categories: age, country, occupation and times; the internal image is combined with moral factors, and then it is transformed into the moral image of male characters. The frequency statistics of the above three categories are carried out by the method of frequency statistics, and the related data are analyzed to compare the similarities and differences between the two sets of teaching materials. Finally, the author puts forward some personal suggestions on teaching and compiling for teachers and textbook editors. The full text is divided into six parts: introduction; the first part-the analysis frame of male characters in the two sets of textbooks; the second part-the quantitative statistics and fictitious analysis of the male characters in the two sets of textbooks; The third part-the external image analysis of the male characters in the two sets of textbooks; the fourth part-the analysis of the inner images of the male characters in the two sets of textbooks; the fifth part-the inspiration from the comparative study of the male characters in the two sets of textbooks. Through the above statistical analysis, I found that the two sets of textbooks in the selection and arrangement of male characters are both common and different. The most obvious common point is that the two sets of textbooks focus on selecting children of the same age as students as the main protagonists of the text. The most significant difference is that the educational version is more important than the selection of heroes and politicians. The Hong Kong version is based on reality, and on modernity and life. Teachers can organize male characters in teaching materials according to the same type or subject. According to the development of the times, textbook compilers should update the contents of textbooks in time based on the growth characteristics of modern primary school students. The two sets of textbooks are based on their respective historical and cultural backgrounds and have their own merits.
【学位授予单位】:上海师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G623.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沈瑞;刘权华;;教科书中性别问题的分析和研究——以新课改后苏教版小学语文教科书为例[J];基础教育;2013年06期
2 田良;;小学语文教材文化中性别取向失衡现象之我见[J];教师;2013年16期
3 沈冬妹;王家伦;;不该忽略的另一半——小学语文教材中的女性形象分析之一[J];湖南第一师范学院学报;2013年01期
4 武晓伟;;小语教材的人物性别分析——以河教版小语教材为例[J];黑河学刊;2009年09期
5 宋韬;;社会学视野下的教科书性别倾向分析——以苏教版初中语文教科书为例[J];现代中小学教育;2009年10期
6 付绪红;;沪教版初中语文教材选文中女性形象审察述论[J];苏州教育学院学报;2009年03期
7 陈焰;;关于小学语文教材性别印象的调查[J];语文教学与研究;2009年17期
8 郝晶晶;;对初中语文教科书中人物的性别分析[J];晋中学院学报;2008年05期
9 乔晖;;小学语文教材的性别偏见——从女性主义视角出发[J];教育学术月刊;2008年07期
10 李德显;韩凤仪;;小学五年级语文教科书人物形象的比较分析——以人教版和苏教版教材为例[J];教育理论与实践;2008年20期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 徐敏娜;大陆香港小学语文教科书人物形象比较[D];浙江师范大学;2009年
2 刘霞;小学语文教材中的性别偏见研究[D];南京师范大学;2008年
3 武晓伟;小学语文教科书中的性别研究[D];南京师范大学;2007年
,本文编号:1997813
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xiaoxuejiaoyu/1997813.html