当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 小学教育论文 >

我国小学生课后托管的问题研究

发布时间:2018-10-29 20:16
【摘要】:长期以来,我国小学生的课后看护、照顾与教育都属于家庭职责的范畴。但随着经济的发展、家庭的变迁以及家长观念的转变,小学生的课后看护和教育问题日益引起了全社会特别是广大家长的忧虑和思考。尤其是随着二胎政策的全面放开,小学生课后照顾问题将更加严峻,托管难题将更加凸显。对课后托管的强烈诉求已经不再是少数家庭的个别需求,而是万千家庭的共同愿望。我国的小学生课后托管班起源于20世纪90年代初,经过二十余年的发展,目前我国小学生课后托管服务的主要供给者依旧是市场运作的各类托管机构,这些机构以营利为目的,归属权混乱,缺乏监管与规范,存在诸多安全隐患,教育质量良莠不齐,所以家长呼吁政府能够担起职责,支持、鼓励学校作为主体承办托管班,解决其后顾之忧;然而依托于政府财政支持的公立学校在校托管服务仅属于地方政府的小范围探索,缺乏明确的政策和资金支持,再加上学校的抵触,学校课后托管处境尴尬;新兴的公益性小学生托管服务又由于缺乏政府的制度安排、资金和师资的支持而动力不足。没有形成规范成熟的小学生课后托管制度体系。这些情况与我国相关政策法律法规缺失以及小学生课后托管的性质、责任归属和实施方式等尚不明确直接相关。由于小学生课后托管属于准公共产品,再加上托管社会公共需求的日益增加、政府职能的转变以及社会力量的不断壮大,小学生课后托管应当纳入教育公共服务的范畴,政府的介入是必不可少的,并且在推动小学生课后托管的发展上起主导作用。政府不仅要负责安排小学生课后托管服务的生产和供给,还必须对托管服务的参与者给予支持、指导和监管,在开展课后托管服务的过程中遵循公共性、公平性、基础性、整体性以及因地制宜的原则,从宏观层面为小学生课后托管提供良好的制度环境,从中观层面建立规范有序的小学生课后托管运行体系,从微观层面有重点地对各种类型的托管实施方式予以安排和指导,推动我国小学生课后托管的制度建设,从而保障小学生课后托管的良好有序发展。
[Abstract]:For a long time, after-school care, care and education of primary school students in our country belong to the category of family duties. However, with the development of economy, the change of family and the change of parents' concept, the problem of primary school students' after-school care and education has aroused the worry and thinking of the whole society, especially the parents. Especially with the opening of the policy of two-child, the problem of after-school care for primary school students will be more serious, and the problem of trusteeship will become more prominent. The strong demand for after-school trusteeship is no longer the individual needs of a few families, but the common aspiration of thousands of families. The after-school care classes of primary school students in our country originated in the early 1990s. After more than 20 years of development, the main providers of after-school trusteeship services for primary school students in China are still various types of trusteeship institutions operating in the market. These institutions aim at making profits. The ownership rights are confused, lack of supervision and regulation, there are many hidden dangers of safety, and the quality of education is intermingled, so parents appeal to the government to take up the responsibility, support, encourage schools as the main undertaking of the care classes, and solve their worries; However, the school trusteeship service which depends on the government financial support only belongs to the local government's small scope exploration, lacks the explicit policy and the fund support, plus the school resists, the school after-school trusteeship situation is awkward; The new public-welfare primary school care service is lack of motivation due to the lack of government institutional arrangements, funds and teachers' support. There is no formal and mature system of after-school trusteeship system for primary school students. These conditions are directly related to the lack of relevant policies, laws and regulations, the nature of primary school students' after-school trusteeship, the attribution of responsibility and the way of implementation. As primary school students' after-school trusteeship is a quasi-public product, coupled with the increasing public demand of the trusteeship society, the transformation of government functions and the continuous growth of social forces, the after-school trusteeship of primary school students should be included in the scope of public education services. Government intervention is essential and plays a leading role in the development of primary school-school trusteeship. The government should not only be responsible for arranging the production and supply of after-school care services for primary school students, but also must support, guide and supervise the participants in the after-school care services, and follow the publicity, fairness, and foundation in the process of carrying out after-school care services. According to the principles of integrity and local conditions, it provides a good institutional environment for primary school students' after-school trusteeship from the macro level, and establishes a standardized and orderly after-school trusteeship operation system from the meso-level. In order to promote the system construction of primary school students' after-school trusteeship in China, the author puts emphasis on the arrangement and guidance of various types of trusteeship from the micro level, so as to ensure the good and orderly development of primary school students' after-school trusteeship.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G629.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郭庆;;中小学生教育托管:理路与实践的讨论[J];广东技术师范学院学报;2016年06期

2 周红霞;;发达国家小学课后托管政策的比较与借鉴[J];外国中小学教育;2016年06期

3 胡劲松;吴会会;;义务教育学校托管的法律属性[J];教育发展研究;2016年02期

4 阎亚军;李赤;;政府推动义务教育阶段学校托管班发展研究[J];天津师范大学学报(基础教育版);2016年01期

5 王东;;学校课后活动机制的现状和反思——基于“无偿托管”模式的实证分析[J];首都师范大学学报(社会科学版);2015年06期

6 邓雪柳;周璐yN;雷文科;;校内托管——小学生“四点钟困境”的解决之道[J];教学与管理;2015年35期

7 王建强;;课后托管,往左,还是朝右——来自四川“课后托管”的案例观察[J];四川教育;2015年Z2期

8 吴开俊;孟卫青;;治理视角下小学生课后托管的制度设计[J];教育研究;2015年06期

9 周红霞;;国内小学课后托管政策与相关研究综述[J];基础教育参考;2015年09期

10 何静;严仲连;;加拿大学龄儿童托管教育的内容、特点及启示[J];外国中小学教育;2015年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 钱忠军;;湖北化解小学生课后看管难题[N];文汇报;2016年

2 欧金玉;田燕;;小学课后托管班不能“脱管”[N];湖南日报;2016年

3 陈若葵;;小学生课后托管难题有望破解?[N];中国妇女报;2016年

4 闫澍枫;;完善学生托管需要法律支持[N];珠海特区报;2015年

5 王建强;;“脱管”的托管班[N];中国教育报;2015年

6 柯中明;;治理“托管难”学校不能缺位[N];中国教育报;2015年

7 谢苗枫;;告急的“午休床位”[N];南方日报;2015年

8 王睿;;对课后托管新政必须科学管理[N];广州日报;2014年

9 张西陆;任飞;;午休托管每人每天补2元[N];南方日报;2014年

10 丁静;;学校甩了包袱,,苦了学生忙了家长[N];新华每日电讯;2014年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 何鹏程;教育公共服务体系构建研究[D];华东师范大学;2012年

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 齐梓新;我国小学校外托管班伦理问题研究[D];沈阳师范大学;2015年

2 费丽;中小学生家长对校外辅导态度的调查研究[D];南昌大学;2015年

3 周双燕;社区儿童“托管课堂”教育中的社会工作介入研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2014年

4 沈佳丽;城市学龄儿童“托管”现象的调查研究[D];安徽大学;2013年

5 谭慧容;上海市小学生晚托班现状研究[D];华东师范大学;2012年

6 吴红顺;乌海市中小学生社会托管问题的探讨和对策[D];内蒙古师范大学;2011年



本文编号:2298697

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xiaoxuejiaoyu/2298697.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户01b62***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com