团体沙盘游戏疗法对家困大学新生人际交往困扰的干预研究
发布时间:2018-03-20 17:39
本文选题:团体沙盘游戏疗法 切入点:家困大学新生 出处:《湖南师范大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:以沙盘游戏疗法为主,采用实验法比较不同团体辅导方法对家困新生人际交往问题的干预疗效,提高家困新生的人际交往能力,为高校心理咨询和辅导提供实证依据。对2013级3782名新生进行心理健康普查的基础上,筛查出439名交往困难的学生,排除可能存在心理障碍学生155人,排除可能存在交往障碍的学生160,根据家困生的标准,以24名人际交往困扰严重者人的新生(其中家困生18人)为对象,采用等组实验设计(分别为家困新生团体沙盘游戏组、家困新生团体心理辅导组、非家困新生团体沙盘游戏组和对照组)进行干预研究,并设计了沙盘游戏和团体心理辅导两套方案。干预后后测结果显示各组在总分和4个分量表存在显著差异,具体表现为在总分上A组与B、C、D组之间均在0.01水平显著差异,B和D组在0.05水平上显著差异;在交际困扰上,A组和D组于0.05水平存在差异显著;在接人待物困扰上,A组和C组于0.05水平存在显著差异;异性交往困扰上,A组和D组于0.01水平存在显著差异。间隔三个月后追踪测结果显示各组在总分和4个分量表存在显著差异,具体表现为在总分上A组与B组、C组、D组均在0.01水平显著差异,B组与D组在0.01水平显著差异;在交谈困扰上,A组和C组在0.01水平显著差异;在接人待物困扰上,A组和C组在0.05水平显著差异;异性交往困扰上,A组和D组在0.05水平显著差异。前测与追踪测试之间存在显著差异,后测与追踪测试之间无显著差异。沙盘游戏疗法能显著改善家困新生的人际交往困扰;沙盘游戏疗法优于一般团体辅导;沙盘游戏疗法疗效具有一定的稳定性。
[Abstract]:In order to improve the interpersonal communication ability of the freshmen with poor families, the intervention effect of different group counseling methods on interpersonal communication problems was compared by using the sand table game therapy, and the experimental method was used to compare the effects of different group counseling methods on the interpersonal problems of the freshmen. On the basis of the mental health survey of 3782 freshmen in 2013, 439 students with difficulties in communication were screened out, 155 students were excluded. According to the standard of the poor students at home, according to the standard of the poor students at home, the students who excluded the possibility of having difficulties in communication were selected as the subjects of 24 freshmen with severe interpersonal problems (18 of them from the family), and the same experimental design was used (the sandtable game group for the freshmen with family difficulties, respectively). The intervention study was carried out in the psychological counseling group, the sand table game group and the control group. After intervention, the results showed that there were significant differences in total scores and 4 subscales among the groups. There were significant differences in the total scores between group A and group D at 0.01 level and between group B and group D at 0.05 level, and there were significant differences in communication distress between group A and group D at 0.05 level. There was significant difference between group A and group C in the level of 0.05; There was significant difference in the level of 0.01 between group A and group D. after the interval of three months, the results showed that there were significant differences in the total score and the four subscales in each group. There was a significant difference in the total score between group A and group B (P < 0.01) and between group B and group D (P < 0.01), and between group A and group C (P < 0.01), and between group A and group C (P < 0.01). There were significant differences between group A and group C at 0.05 level, group A with heterosexual disturbance and group D with group D at 0.05 level. There was a significant difference between pretest and tracking test. There was no significant difference between posttest and follow-up test. Sand play therapy could significantly improve the interpersonal disturbance of the freshmen. Sand game therapy was superior to general group counseling. The therapeutic effect of sand game therapy had certain stability.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G448
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 易善武;;高校贫困生问题的三维考察[J];中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版);2012年01期
2 张迪;;团体箱庭疗法及其在高校心理咨询中的应用[J];科教导刊(上旬刊);2010年11期
3 许振兴;;贫困大学生人际信任危机及其对策研究[J];中国青年研究;2010年07期
4 付海明;;贫困大学生思想政治教育问题初探[J];鸡西大学学报;2010年01期
5 王挺;杜文东;;大学贫困生个性及心理健康现状调查[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2007年06期
6 王牧野;胡和兵;吴勇民;;大学生人际交往的现状浅析及对策研究[J];南方论刊;2006年05期
7 张长伟;高校贫困生人际交往障碍的个案研究[J];中国青年政治学院学报;2005年05期
8 李黎,胡保卫,徐浩;大学新生心理健康状况调查及分析[J];绍兴文理学院学报(自然科学);2004年09期
9 陈明银;大学生人际交往障碍及其消除[J];漯河职业技术学院学报(综合版);2003年03期
10 郑勇;高校贫困生群体社会支持中的学校责任[J];黑龙江高教研究;2003年05期
,本文编号:1640122
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xuekejiaoyulunwen/1640122.html