“私学产生于春秋时期”属于重大学术误判

发布时间：2018-04-22 05:08

本文选题：私学 + 官学　；参考：《江海学刊》2015年06期

【摘要】："私学产生于春秋时期"属于重大学术误判。主要涉及"春秋以前无私学"之论的学术方法失误,即深受"圣王"史观误导、沿袭儒者的曲解、误读古代史籍、不恰当使用"私学"一词;"官学衰而私学兴"论证方式的宏观把握失误,即忽视私学与人类社会相始终、早期文明都有私学与官学并存的现象、官学没有能力垄断学识和教育、官学的形成与发展有赖于私学;春秋以前具备推动私学发展的历史条件,即王权衰微及诸侯异政、王室典籍扩散、士庶阶层扩充、民间著述传播;否定"华夏早期国家千余年无私学"的理据,如族群及地域文化差异显著、家教家学广泛存在和国学颇似家塾宗学等。
[Abstract]:"Private study originated in the Spring and Autumn period" is a major academic misjudgment. Mainly involved in the academic errors of the theory of "selfless study before the Spring and Autumn period", that is, deeply misled by the historical view of the "Holy King", followed the misinterpretation of the Confucian, and misread the ancient historical books. The improper use of the word "private study" and the failure of the way of demonstration of "official studies decline but private studies flourish", that is, neglecting the existence of private learning and human society, the coexistence of private learning and official learning in early civilization, and the inability of official studies to monopolize knowledge and education. The formation and development of the official school depends on the private school; before the Spring and Autumn period, there were historical conditions to promote the development of the private school, that is, the decline of Wang Quan and the different governments of the princes, the spread of the royal books, the expansion of the scholar class, and the spread of the folk writings. For example, there are significant differences between ethnic groups and regional cultures, the widespread existence of family education and the study of traditional Chinese culture, and so on.
【作者单位】：南开大学高等教育研究所暨校史研究室;天津社会科学杂志社;
【基金】：天津市社科基金项目“南开大学校训与优秀传统文化教育研究”(项目号:TJJX13-004) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目“中华优秀传统文化与素质教育研究”(项目号:NKZXB1407)资助
【分类号】：G529

【共引文献】