元教育学若干基本问题研究综述

发布时间：2018-01-17 01:20

本文关键词：元教育学若干基本问题研究综述　出处：《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2011年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：综观国内近30年的元教育学研究,大多是围绕其基本问题展开的,其中既有共识,又有争议。就概念而言,虽从不同视角揭示了其某些本质特征,但还存在不系统、不完整等问题;就对象而言,虽基本达成共识,但却存在"窄化"与"泛化"的问题;就任务而言,虽确定了以构建更为合理的教育学为任务的研究导向,但对于任务的具体认识尚不统一;就性质而言,虽揭示了其复杂性,但对于其属于"学科"还是"领域"还存在难以调和的矛盾;就其与教育学的关系而言,虽都承认它们关系密切,但存在着"一统"与"超越"之争。展望未来,随着提高教育学科学化程度的现实诉求不断增强,元教育学研究必将逐步得到重视。
[Abstract]:In the past 30 years, most of the meta-pedagogy researches in China have been carried out around its basic problems, which are not only common but also controversial. In terms of concept, it reveals some essential characteristics from different perspectives. However, there are still some problems, such as unsystematic and incomplete. As far as the object is concerned, although consensus has been reached basically, there are the problems of "narrowing" and "generalization". As far as the task is concerned, although the research orientation of constructing a more reasonable pedagogy is determined, the specific understanding of the task is not uniform. As far as its nature is concerned, although it reveals its complexity, there are still some contradictions which are difficult to reconcile between "subject" and "field". As far as the relationship between it and pedagogy is concerned, it is acknowledged that they are closely related, but there is a dispute between "unification" and "transcendence". Looking forward to the future, the realistic demands of improving the scientific degree of pedagogy are constantly strengthened. The research of meta-pedagogy will be paid more and more attention gradually.
【作者单位】：厦门大学教育研究院;
【基金】：“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”(编号:2010221037)资助
【分类号】：G40-01
【正文快照】： 随着20世纪初“反审文化”①的出现,特别是此后元研究和元理论的兴起,自20世纪70年代始,人们在对教育学的批判与反思中,逐渐形成了一门“新学”———元教育学。而正如元研究和元理论从诞生之日就充满歧义与争议一样,元教育学为“何物”?在学界至今莫衷一是,未能盖棺定论。本

【参考文献】