贫困与非贫困大学生心理健康水平及人格的差异研究

发布时间：2018-03-20 02:16

本文选题：贫困生　切入点：心理健康　出处：《中国健康心理学杂志》2011年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的研究贫困与非贫困大学生心理健康水平及人格的差异。方法使用症状自评量表(SCL-90)、爱德华个性偏好量表(EPPS)与明尼苏达多相人格测验(MMPI)进行测评,并进行差异检验。结果贫困与非贫困大学生SCL-90人际敏感(t=-2.8,P0.01)、抑郁(t=-2.3,P0.05)、焦虑(t=-2.2,P0.05)、强迫(t=-2.4,P0.05)、恐惧(t=-2.7,P0.01)、精神病性因子(t=-2.3,P0.05)存在显著差异;贫困与非贫困大学生爱德华个性偏好量表各因子无显著差异;明尼苏达多相人格测验社会内向因子(t=-2.8,P0.01)差异极其显著,轻躁狂因子(t=2.3,P0.05)差异显著。结论贫困大学生心理健康状况不如非贫困大学生,贫困大学生更具有内向性与退缩性。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the differences in mental health and personality between poor and non-impoverished college students. Methods SCL-90, EPPS and MMPI were used to evaluate the mental health of poor and non-poor college students. Results there were significant differences between poor and non-poor college students in SCL-90 interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, compulsion, phobia, fear, and psychotic factors, respectively, and there were significant differences between poor and non-poor college students in terms of interpersonal sensitivity (P 0.01), depression (P 0.05), anxiety (t) -2.2n (P 0.05), fear (-2.7P 0.01) and psychotic factors (P 0.05), and there were significant differences between poor and non-poor college students in terms of interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety, anxiety and anxiety. There was no significant difference in the factors of Edward Personality preference scale between poor and non-poor college students, but the difference was extremely significant in the social introversion factor of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Test (MMPT). Conclusion the mental health status of poor college students is not as good as that of non-poor college students, and poor college students are more introverted and withdrawn.
【作者单位】：大连医科大学中山学院;
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】