临床医学硕士研究生培养质量的实证研究

发布时间：2018-04-03 13:38

本文选题：临床医学　切入点：硕士研究生　出处：《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》2012年11期

【摘要】：目的了解临床医学硕士研究生培养质量的现状,并分析存在的问题。方法采用分层整群随机抽样的方法,在上海交通大学2006—2009年毕业的622名临床医学硕士研究生中,按照就业主要聚集地区和分布单位,抽取在上海地区26家医院就业的415名研究生,由医院的人事主管或科室领导对临床医学硕士研究生培养质量(包括职业价值观、专业能力、职业发展能力、身心素质和科研能力5个方面)进行评判,并与毕业生的自我评价结果作配对比较。结果用人单位对临床医学硕士研究生培养质量评价较低的依次是批判性思维能力(21.62%)、创新能力(36.0%)和相关学科知识(36.04%);用人单位对研究生培养质量的评价与毕业生的自我评价比较,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);用人单位注重毕业生职业价值观的培养,毕业生注重专业技能的训练;用人单位对是否为独生子女、居住地、本科毕业院校的毕业生质量评价比较有统计学差异(P0.05)。实证因子分析得出4个公因子,分别是专业知识和专业技能、可迁移能力、科研能力和职业价值观。结论用人单位认为临床医学硕士研究生的创新能力不足、相关学科知识薄弱。用人单位和毕业生对临床医学研究生培养质量的预期目标存在差异,是否为独生子女、城乡差异、本科毕业院校等因素对研究生培养质量存在影响。评价临床医学硕士研究生的培养质量,可从专业知识和专业技能、可迁移能力、科研能力和职业价值观4个方面展开。
[Abstract]:Objective to understand the present situation of cultivation quality of postgraduates in clinical medicine and analyze the existing problems.Methods the stratified cluster random sampling was used in 622 graduate students of clinical medicine from 2006 to 2009 in Shanghai Jiaotong University, according to the main areas and distribution units of employment.A total of 415 graduate students employed in 26 hospitals in Shanghai were selected and trained for quality (including professional values, professional ability, career development ability) by personnel supervisor or department leader of the hospital.Physical and mental quality and scientific research ability were evaluated and compared with the self-evaluation results of graduates.Results the evaluation of cultivation quality of graduate students in clinical medicine was evaluated by employers in order of critical thinking ability (21.62%) and innovation ability (36.0%) and related discipline knowledge (36.04%), and the comparison between employers' evaluation of graduate students' training quality and graduates' self-evaluation was made.The difference is statistically significant (P 0.05); employers pay attention to the training of graduates' professional values, and graduates pay attention to the training of professional skills; the employers pay attention to whether they are the only child, where they live.There is a statistical difference in the quality evaluation of graduates in undergraduate colleges and universities (P 0.05).Empirical factor analysis shows that four common factors are professional knowledge and professional skills, transferability, scientific research ability and professional values.Conclusion the employer thinks that the innovation ability of the graduate students of clinical medicine is insufficient and the knowledge of related subjects is weak.There are differences between employers and graduates on the expected goal of training quality of clinical medical graduate students, whether they are only children, differences between urban and rural areas, and factors affecting the quality of postgraduate training.To evaluate the quality of postgraduate training in clinical medicine, it can be carried out from four aspects: professional knowledge and skills, transportable ability, scientific research ability and professional values.
【作者单位】：上海交通大学研究生院医学院分院;
【基金】：上海交通大学医学院人文社会科学创新研究培育基金重点项目(W21213)~~
【分类号】：R4-4;G643

【参考文献】