美国高等院校药学院对药学博士研究生选择和录取情况的介绍

发布时间:2018-12-12 09:59
【摘要】:目的:为提高我国的药学教育质量提供参考。方法:以近年来国内和国外的相关文献以及一些美国高等院校药学院官方网站的信息为依据,对美国高等院校药学院选择和录取药学博士研究生的要求和方法进行介绍,总结其相关特点。结果与结论:近10年来美国的药学教育发展较快,为了保证药师的质量,美国高等院校药学院很重视对于药学博士研究生的选择和录取,各高等院校药学院通过药学院入学考试成绩、大学平均成绩了解申请者的学术能力和潜力,通过申请者的推荐信、个人陈述、参加课外活动情况了解申请者的的他人和自我评价及社会活动能力;再根据上述材料评估和比较申请者情况,按照一定的比例选择和安排申请者面试,以了解申请者的口头表达和交流能力等。面试后最终由药学院录取委员会作出决定。与我国相比,美国高等院校药学院选择药学博士研究生的过程比较全面,重视申请者在分数之外的综合能力,已经形成了一套比较完整的体系。
[Abstract]:Objective: to provide reference for improving the quality of pharmaceutical education in China. Methods: based on the relevant literature in recent years and the information on the official websites of the pharmacology colleges of American colleges and universities, the requirements and methods of selecting and admitting Ph.D. students in the pharmacological schools of American colleges and universities were introduced. Summarize its related characteristics. Results & conclusion: pharmaceutical education in the United States has developed rapidly in the past 10 years. In order to ensure the quality of pharmacists, the Pharmacy College of American colleges and universities attaches great importance to the selection and admission of Ph.D. students in pharmacy. Through the entrance examination results of pharmacology colleges and universities, the average results of the universities understand the academic ability and potential of the applicants, and through the letters of recommendation of the applicants, personal statements are made. Participate in extracurricular activities to learn about the applicant's other people and self-evaluation and social activities ability; Then evaluate and compare the applicant according to the above materials, select and arrange the interview according to certain proportion, to understand the applicant's oral expression and communication ability, etc. After the interview, the final decision is made by the admission Committee of the College of Pharmacy. Compared with our country, the process of selecting Ph.D. students in pharmacology colleges and universities in the United States is relatively comprehensive, and the comprehensive ability of applicants beyond the score has been paid more attention to, which has formed a relatively complete system.
【作者单位】: 广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院药学部;
【分类号】:G643;R-4

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 彭师奇;药学发展环境变迁与对策[J];药学教育;2005年02期

2 李霄凌;;药学博士学位的培养目标及评估[J];中国高等教育评估;2010年04期

3 王洁华;;美国药学博士职业化培养取向及启示[J];医学与哲学(人文社会医学版);2011年01期

4 陈永法;;美国的药学博士教育[J];药学教育;2005年04期

5 庞挺;吴春福;;日本药学人才培养研究[J];药学教育;2008年01期

6 谢晓慧;史录文;陈欣;;美国药学博士培养标准和指南及其启示[J];中国药事;2007年02期

7 ;第二军医大学药学院[J];药学教育;2013年02期

8 沈爱军,吴广,魏水易,舒丽芯;美国在职药师校外药学博士学位计划初探[J];药学服务与研究;2002年01期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 通讯员 沈基飞 玄立新;全国首届药学博士后论坛在京举行[N];中国人事报;2010年



本文编号:2374368

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/yjsjy/2374368.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户bda90***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com