河北省幼小衔接教育现状研究
[Abstract]:The young cohesion refers to the connection between the early childhood education and the primary education. In the two different stages of the psychological development of the children in the kindergarten and the primary stage, the typical characteristics of their psychological development are of different nature. There is a clear difference between the two stages of education. Therefore, the successful completion of the child from the kindergarten to the primary school plays a very important role in the child's growth and psychological development. Professor Huck, a German educational scientist, is of the view that children face six mental faults in the early stage of engagement: the fault of the person, the fault of the way of learning, the fault of the code of conduct, the fault of the social structure, the fault of the desired level, and the fault of the learning environment. Therefore, this stage of education plays an important role in helping the child to safely and successfully span these psychological faults. At present, the research on the young cohesion is mainly divided into two research directions: one is the research orientation of the external education environment, which focuses on the development of the children, and mainly focuses on the aspects of the setting of the educational institution, the setting of the curriculum, the training of the teachers and the work of the parents, and the other, The research orientation of the children's mental development is focused on the study of the psychological behavior of the children's admission to the school. However, the existing research lacks the construction of the proper judgment standard of the effective admission, and more is to judge the present situation of the young connection from the angle of experience or sensibility, and influence the quality and the practical guidance of the research. In this study, an empirical study was used to construct a questionnaire on the status of children's psychological behavior, and it has a high validity. At the same time, through the comparison of the teaching behavior of the pre-school teachers and the difference of the expected requirements of the primary school teachers, the present situation and the problems of the young cohesive education in Hebei Province are found, and the reference for teachers to adjust their education teaching is provided. The main conclusions of this study are as follows:1. The primary school teacher's expectation of a year's new life is the academic adaptation, the lowest is the independence, and the two between the two are the general adaptation of the thinking and the behavior. The data show that, in the teaching of education, the kindergarten teachers also pay great attention to the normal training of the thinking and behavior of the children to the primary school, and pay attention to the development of the independence of the children, but the performance of the children in these two aspects is very poor after the children enter the primary school. The quality of the children's psychological behavior and the quality of the primary school teachers in the kindergarten teachers are different from that of the primary school teachers. From the content, the education content of the kindergarten should be further strengthened is the cultivation of the character and the behavior habit and the learning habit. Male teachers adapt to the students' thinking and behavior, and the expectation of academic adaptation is significantly higher than that of female teachers; in the self-independence expectation, the female teachers' expectation of primary school freshmen is higher than that of male teachers. The expectation of primary school teachers in rural primary school is higher than that of urban and urban-rural joint. The teaching behavior of the teachers in the rural kindergarten places great importance on the level of the young cohesive education, the degree of attention of the urban teachers is the lowest, and the kindergarten teachers in the combination of the urban and rural areas are in the middle of the two. The teaching behavior of the kindergarten teachers with the college degree has the highest importance to the level of the young cohesive education and the expectation of the primary school teachers to the students' admission to the psychological behavior level. The teachers with a high degree of education have a lower performance. The expected level of the primary school teachers of over 6.15 years is higher than that of the lower teaching age, and the teachers in the age of 7 to 10 years are at a lower level in all the factors. In contrast to the teaching age, the lower the title of the primary school teacher is higher than the professional title, the primary school teacher of the senior title has the lowest expectation of the psychological development level of the new school. The public kindergarten teacher is more concerned with the young cohesive education of the child in relation to the private kindergarten. In the period of 1-3 years, the teaching age of the new-in-school teachers and the school-age teachers in the age of 10-15 years is the highest in the education of the young-connected education. The kindergarten teachers of over 15 years and the kindergarten teachers of the age of 7-10 years have the lowest attention to the behavior of the young-connected education in three factors. On the basis of the arrangement of the teachers of the young connected education, the kindergarten and the primary school tend to adopt the teacher's circulation system, but the primary school also pays attention to the teaching experience and the teaching age. The most weak link of the young cohesive education is the communication and contact between the kindergarten and the primary school, and the lack of such a kind of mutual communication, and the direct result is that the young cohesive education of the two-stage school has the fault zone.11. The majority of primary schools, kindergartens, and the media have carried out young cohesion campaigns, but only about one-third of the schools continue to arrange for young cohesion. Based on the results of the above research, this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to improve the effectiveness of the young cohesive education in Hebei province, in particular, the first, in the content of the young cohesive education, the kindergarten should strengthen the normal and independent culture of the children's thinking and behavior, and the second, Strengthen the interactive communication between the kindergarten and the primary school, and promote the fit of the young cohesive work of the two-stage school; and thirdly, do a good job of the young joint education management of the kindergarten and the primary school, and promote the improvement of the education effect; and fourthly, strengthen the cooperation and communication of the home school, To promote the role of the parents in the young cohesive education, the fifth, to learn from the advanced experience at home and abroad, to update the teaching mode of the kindergarten teachers and primary school teachers, and to promote the rapid and effective development of the children's psychological behavior.
【学位授予单位】:河北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G619.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周蔓雪;对幼小衔接工作有关问题的新认识[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);2005年S1期
2 胡红;与家长朋友谈幼小衔接[J];教学与管理;2005年05期
3 李敏谊;崔淑婧;刘颖;;近十年国外不同利益相关者对于幼小衔接问题看法的研究综述[J];外国中小学教育;2010年05期
4 樊玉莲;樊冬梅;陈琛;;构建幼小衔接联动机制的实践研究[J];上海教育科研;2010年05期
5 李敏谊;刘颖;崔淑婧;;国外近10年幼小衔接理论研究综述[J];比较教育研究;2010年05期
6 薛辉;;在幼小双向互动中谈幼小衔接教育[J];现代中小学教育;2011年04期
7 裴峥嵘;;幼小衔接问题之我见[J];才智;2011年13期
8 崔新玲;梁进龙;;法国幼小衔接的经验及启示[J];商品与质量;2011年S7期
9 段伟红;;中美幼小衔接教育之比较[J];新西部(理论版);2012年10期
10 李晓芳;赵碧玫;冉昕;张林;;六盘水幼小衔接:现状与对策研究[J];六盘水师范学院学报;2012年04期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 刘新红;;幼小衔接工作中存在的问题及解决策略研究[A];2012年幼儿教师专业与发展论坛论文集[C];2013年
2 宋怀昌;;正确处理好幼小衔接的几个原则问题[A];中国管理科学文献[C];2008年
3 康长运;;中国近代幼小衔接理论和实践[A];纪念《教育史研究》创刊二十周年论文集(5)——中国基础教育史研究(含学前教育、义务教育、高中教育、特殊教育、工读教育等)[C];2009年
4 孙雪莲;;拓展幼小衔接视角 促阅读习惯养成[A];2014年8月现代教育教学探索学术交流会论文集[C];2014年
5 郝海鸥;;开拓进取为教育 求实创新为学生[A];国家教师科研专项基金科研成果(神州教育卷2)[C];2013年
6 高文军;;视障儿童入学前适应性教育的研究——盲校幼小衔接问题的探讨[A];中国心理卫生协会残疾人心理卫生分会第七届学术交流会论文集[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 记者 张力 通讯员 李文祥;市公安局幼儿园注重“幼小衔接”[N];天津政法报;2007年
2 本报记者 苏军;别让“幼小衔接”走了样[N];文汇报;2009年
3 商报记者 李子君;暴利裹挟的幼小衔接班到底有多值?[N];北京商报;2010年
4 时言平;只有实现教育公平才能抑“天价幼小衔接班”[N];新华每日电讯;2011年
5 本报通讯员 李苑 驻苏记者 何连弟;南京冒出天价“幼小衔接班”[N];文汇报;2011年
6 胡婕 本报记者 薛庆元;幼小衔接:家长应把眼光放远一些[N];中国消费者报;2012年
7 记者 廖君 吴植;“名校情结”催热幼小衔接班,,有培训机构打出“包过”招牌[N];新华每日电讯;2013年
8 浙江省诸暨市浣江幼教集团 应婉林;幼小衔接不能揠苗助长[N];中国教育报;2014年
9 中国教育科学研究院基础教育研究中心主任 研究员 陈如平;谨防“幼小衔接”变身“小学预科”[N];中国教育报;2014年
10 李晓玲;“幼小衔接”:广东尝试新版本[N];中国妇女报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杨明珠;幼小衔接阶段父母的教育策略[D];云南师范大学;2015年
2 王燕;幼小衔接教育实践研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2015年
3 何成霞;幼小衔接中一年级教育存在的问题和对策研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2015年
4 王长志;“K-2”学制下教学空间环境艺术设计的研究[D];四川师范大学;2016年
5 曹璐;幼小衔接视角下的语言教育研究[D];信阳师范学院;2016年
6 付熙媛;幼小衔接阶段家庭教育现状的调查研究[D];云南师范大学;2016年
7 杨静;基于儿童视角的幼小衔接研究[D];西华师范大学;2016年
8 董敏;承德市双桥区幼小衔接问题调查与策略研究[D];河北大学;2015年
9 李丽;人类发展生态学视角下的幼小衔接研究[D];贵州师范大学;2015年
10 罗成;遵义市幼小衔接课程的现状调查[D];贵州师范大学;2016年
本文编号:2501224
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jichujiaoyulunwen/2501224.html