城市房屋拆迁合同履行问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-12 06:19

本文关键词：城市房屋拆迁合同履行问题研究　出处：《中央民族大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来,随着城市化建设速度的加快,旧城改造、新城建设项目层出不穷。由于一线城市房地产市场逐渐呈现饱和状态,转战二三线城市的房地产市场成为众多开发商的选择。二三线城市虽然具有国家政策支持,且本身具有一定的资源优势,但是住房刚性需求不足是无法避免的事实。开发商开发规模过大,当地居民住房购买力不足,使得资金无法快速回收,造成安置房屋无法按时完成建设,出现大批烂尾楼。而且,房地产市场的崩溃,房价的大幅下跌,造成众多拆迁户意欲借助开发商无法交房等违约行为解除房屋拆迁补偿安置协议,以避免损失的扩大。开发商陷入了既无足够资金继续建设房屋,又无能力赔偿拆迁户损失的两难境地。在这样的情况下,妥善解决开发商和拆迁户之间的纠纷迫在眉睫,因为这不仅关涉到当事人的权利是否能够得到合法救济,而且也牵涉到社会的和谐和稳定、法律维护的公平正义精神能否体现在每一个案件中。虽然目前部分城市采取了一系列措施如"房票"等制度来解决住房库存问题,但这些措施主要针对的是已建成的房屋,对于开发商和拆迁户之间因为烂尾房等问题引起的纠纷并无针对性措施。笔者从二三线城市房地产发展现状这一实际情况出发,梳理出当前拆迁补偿安置协议履行过程中出现的典型问题,其中主要包括延期交房、房屋质量、房屋初装修质量以及房屋公共部分的问题,这些问题主要是围绕拆迁补偿安置协议的主要标的——房屋,其问题的实质关涉到合同成立的目的是否能够真正实现,关涉到拆迁户的合同利益能否实现。笔者在查阅了大量的相关案件、文献和法律资料之后,通过认真研读、归纳整理、比较分析等方式详细研究了各个典型问题的本质。在提出具体的解决之道之前,本文对于研究问题的范围进行了界定,明确问题包含的不同方面和类型,然后依次分析不同类型的问题中双方当事人违约行为的原因力大小、违约行为对权利的损害程度以及其他影响因素。本文提出的解除方法亦是本着严守合同原则,在合同能够得以维持和履行的情况下,要求违约方继续履行合同,对于违约行为产生的损失由违约方根据法律规定和实际情况进行赔偿,只有在违约行为严重影响到了合同目的实现的情况下,才允许开发商和拆迁户解除房屋补偿安置协议。期望本文对于补偿协议履行中出现问题的归纳和解决方法的提出,能够为以后其他城市房地产出现类似纠纷的解决提供参考和借鉴。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the acceleration of urbanization and the transformation of the old city, new city construction projects emerge in endlessly. As the real estate market in first-tier cities gradually presents saturation state. The real estate market of the second and third tier cities has become the choice of many developers. Although the second and third tier cities have national policy support, they have certain resource advantages. However, the lack of rigid demand for housing is inevitable. Developers development scale is too large, local residents' purchasing power is insufficient, so that the funds can not be recovered quickly, resulting in resettlement houses can not be completed on time. There are a large number of uncompleted flats. Moreover, the collapse of the real estate market, house prices fell sharply, resulting in a large number of demolition tenants want to help developers unable to pay the house such as default behavior to remove the housing demolition compensation and resettlement agreement. In order to avoid the expansion of losses. Developers have neither enough funds to continue to build houses, nor the ability to compensate for the loss of demolition. In this case. It is urgent to properly resolve the disputes between developers and demolition tenants, because it not only concerns whether the rights of the parties can get legal relief, but also involves the harmony and stability of the society. Whether the spirit of fairness and justice maintained by law can be reflected in every case. Although some cities have taken a series of measures such as "housing ticket" system to solve the housing inventory problem. But these measures are mainly aimed at completed housing. There are no targeted measures for the disputes between developers and demolition households due to problems such as rotting end houses. The author proceeds from the actual situation of the development of real estate in the second and third tier cities. Sort out the typical problems in the process of implementation of the current relocation compensation and resettlement agreement, which mainly include the delay of housing delivery, the quality of housing, the quality of the initial decoration of the house and the housing public part of the problem. These problems mainly revolve around the main target of the relocation compensation and resettlement agreement-housing, the essence of which concerns whether the purpose of contract formation can be really realized. The author consulted a large number of relevant cases, literature and legal materials, through careful study, summarized and sorted out. Comparative analysis and other methods of detailed study of the nature of each typical problem. Before putting forward a specific solution, this paper defines the scope of the research problem, clear the different aspects and types of the problem. Then it analyzes the force of the parties' breach of contract in different types of problems in turn. Breach of contract on the degree of damage to rights and other factors. The method proposed in this article is to strictly abide by the principle of contract, in the case of the contract can be maintained and performed, the party in breach of contract to continue to perform the contract. For the loss caused by breach of contract by the party in breach of contract according to the provisions of the law and the actual situation compensation only if the breach of contract seriously affected the realization of the purpose of the contract. It is expected that this paper will sum up and solve the problems in the implementation of the compensation agreement. Can provide reference and reference for other cities real estate similar dispute settlement.
【学位授予单位】：中央民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.297;D923.6

【参考文献】