张南华案的法律分析

发布时间：2018-01-16 15:08

本文关键词：张南华案的法律分析　出处：《兰州大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：房地产商突然失踪,业主集体上访,不料却引出背后的高利贷黑幕。这就是常德首例以非法经营罪拘捕的高利贷案件。张南华及其南华公司以合作开发为幌子进行非法高利贷业务,收取利息之高直接造成多家房地产公司资金链断裂,进而走向破产倒闭,其追讨债务的手段也极端、多样。张南华及其南华公司的高利放贷行为社会影响极其恶劣。当前社会中类似于本案的高利贷案件颇多,社会各界对此争议也很大。究其原因,除了市场经济飞速发展导致企业的资金需求量大且民间闲散资金多以外,最主要的恐怕是法律制度在高利贷方面的缺失导致了民间高利贷的泛滥。本文从张南华案入手,通过对案情的分析,结合民间高利贷与一般的民间借贷的比较,分析张南华及其南华公司的罪与非罪；司法机关最终以非法经营罪对被告进行批捕,学术界对此是有争议的。通过对非法经营罪犯罪构成的详细阐述,结合高利贷犯罪量刑尺度,对是否应该以非法经营罪对此类高利贷犯罪进行定罪进行分析。通过对本案的进一步思考,对高利借贷犯罪的定罪量刑进行思考,进而提出相关的法律制度的建议。全文主体共分为三个部分。第一部分是案情的简要介绍及争议问题的提出,第二部分重点对案例的争议问题进行分析阐述并表明笔者观点。第三部分基于第二部分中对民间高利贷的现状、相关的法律法规的研究对高利贷犯罪的定罪量刑及法律规定的不足之处进行思考与设想,对与高利贷犯罪相关的其他罪名进行了区分,希望能够对民间高利借贷的法律完善提供有效参考。
[Abstract]:The real estate business suddenly disappeared, the owner collective petition. This is Changde's first case of usury arrested for the crime of illegal operation. Zhang Nanhua and his South China company engaged in illegal usury under the guise of cooperative development. The high rate of interest directly causes many real estate companies to break the capital chain and then go bankrupt, and the means to recover debts are also extreme. Various. Zhang Nanhua and his company's high-interest lending behavior social impact is extremely bad. In the current society similar to the case of usury cases quite a lot, the community is also very controversial about this. Investigate the reasons. In addition to the rapid development of the market economy leading to a large demand for capital and private idle funds, the most important is the lack of legal system in the aspect of usury, resulting in the proliferation of private usury. This article starts with Zhang Nanhua case, through the analysis of the case, combines the folk usury and the general folk loan, analyzes Zhang Nanhua and its Nanhua company's crime and not the crime; The judicial organ finally carries on the approval arrest to the defendant with the illegal operation crime, which is disputed by the academic circles. Through the detailed elaboration to the illegal business crime constitution, unifies the loan sharking crime sentencing standard. This article analyzes whether the crime of illegal operation should be used to convict the crime of usury. Through further thinking on this case, the author thinks about the conviction and sentencing of the crime of profiteering and lending. And then put forward the relevant legal system recommendations. The main body of the paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the brief introduction of the case and the proposal of the dispute. The second part focuses on the case of the dispute and the author's point of view. The third part is based on the second part of the current situation of private usury. The study of relevant laws and regulations on the conviction and sentencing of usury crime and legal provisions of the deficiencies of thinking and imagination, and the other offences related to usury crime were differentiated. I hope to be able to provide effective reference to the legal improvement of private high-profit lending.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D924.33

【参考文献】