论商品房预约合同的效力及其违约责任

发布时间：2018-01-28 00:29

本文关键词： 商品房预约合同法律效力违约责任继续履行损害赔偿　出处：《北京交通大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着我国房地产市场的迅速发展,预约合同在商品房买卖领域有着越来越广泛的适用。但是,由于我国《合同法》并没有明文规定预约合同制度,因此导致预约问题在理论和司法实践中存在大量争议,亟待加强法律研究,完善商品房预约合同的效力问题以及违约责任。本文一共分为六个部分:第一部分,问题的提出,结合目前立法与司法实践,着重介绍目前商品房预约合同存在的缺陷为后文具体论述奠定基础。第二部分,商品房预约合同的基本理论,主要包括预约合同的变迁以及商品房预约合同的理论基础,包括契约自由理念和诚实信用理念。第三部分,商品房预约合同与相关概念的辨析,主要包括与认购意向书的辨析,与预售合同的辨析,与附条件合同的辨析。第四部分,商品房预约合同的效力,主要介绍必须磋商说、应当缔约说、内容决定说、视为本约说。并结合我国立法、司法实践,提出主客观相结合说,同时论证该学说的正当性。第五部分,商品房预约合同的违约责任,包括继续履行和损害赔偿责任。对于继续履行的方式,应该从主观解释论的角度出发,先探寻商品房买卖当事人主观意思,区分不同的情况,分别适用磋商或者缔约。至于损害赔偿范围应该界定在信赖利益的范围之内,一般也不应包含机会利益。此外,考虑到商品房预约合同是一种无名合同,还应当适用《合同法》总则的有关规定,因此本文认为定金责任和违约金责任也应当适用到商品房预约中。第六部分,结论。结合前文之论述,对我国商品房预约合同的效力以及违约责任提出自己的构想和建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the real estate market in our country, the reservation contract is more and more widely used in the field of commercial housing sale. However, because of the contract law of our country, there is no explicit stipulation of the reservation contract system. Therefore, there are a lot of disputes in theory and judicial practice. It is urgent to strengthen the legal research, improve the effectiveness of the contract of commercial housing reservation and the liability for breach of contract. This paper is divided into six parts: the first part. Put forward the problem, combined with the current legislation and judicial practice, focusing on the current commercial housing reservation contract defects for the following specific discussion to lay the foundation. The second part, the basic theory of the commercial house reservation contract. Mainly includes the changes of the reservation contract and the theoretical basis of the reservation contract of commercial housing, including the concept of freedom of contract and the concept of good faith. Mainly includes the discrimination with the subscription letter of intent, with the pre-sale contract, with the conditional contract differentiation. 4th part, the effectiveness of the commercial housing reservation contract, the main introduction must be negotiated, should be concluded. The content decision theory is regarded as this contract theory. Combined with the legislation and judicial practice of our country, the author puts forward the combination of subjective and objective theory, and proves the legitimacy of the theory. Part 5th, the responsibility of breach of contract of the commercial house reservation contract. Including continued performance and damage liability. For the way to continue to perform, we should start from the perspective of subjective interpretation theory, first explore the subjective meaning of commercial housing buyers and sellers, distinguish the different situations. As for the scope of damages should be defined in the scope of trust interests, generally should not include opportunity interests. In addition, considering that the commercial housing contract is an anonymous contract. We should also apply the relevant provisions of the General provisions of contract Law, so this article thinks that the liability of deposit and liquidated damages should also be applied to the booking of commercial housing. 6th, conclusion. The author puts forward his own ideas and suggestions on the validity of the contract and the liability for breach of contract.
【学位授予单位】：北京交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】