房屋买卖居间人如实告知义务研究

发布时间：2018-02-12 16:32

本文关键词： 房屋买卖居间人如实告知义务　出处：《大连海事大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：如实告知义务在居间制度中意义重大,它是矫正信息不对称的重要法律手段,更是诚信原则对居间人履行合同义务的基本要求。随着房地产市场的飞速发展,因房屋买卖中居间人不履行如实告知义务引发的纠纷日渐增多,加之司法实务界对如实告知内容的标准、如实告知的信息类型、居间人应否负有调查核实义务以及居间人承担的民事责任等问题观点不一,造成了现行法律制度难以规制社会生活的尴尬局面。民商法学者对《保险法》中投保人和被保险人的如实告知义务较为关注,但对居间人的如实告知义务鲜有问津。本文运用实证研究法、案例分析法,旨在研究房屋买卖居间人的如实告知义务的标准、履行如实告知义务的程度、违反如实告知义务的责任三个层面的问题,从法学、法经济学、法解释学等视角分析、完善房屋居间人如实告知义务制度,以期揭示《合同法》第425条在实然层面的真实内涵,为司法实务中此类案件的判决提供参考。本文除引言和结论,分五个部分论述:第一部分:相关的概念界定。笔者立足于司法实践,明确了房屋买卖居间人的概念及分类,房屋居间人如实告知义务的概念及性质,并划定本文的研究范围,仅限为委托人提供房地产信息和居间代理业务的、主体性质为法人或非法人组织的居间人,不再区分报告居间和媒介居间。第二部分:居间人如实告知义务设立的必要性。笔者从经济学和法学的角度,揭示出居间人如实告知义务产生、发展的事实基础与法理基础,并通过构建居间博弈模型揭示如实告知义务对克服市场失灵的作用,凸显如实告知义务的法律地位。第三部分:居间人如实告知义务的现状分析。笔者采用实证分析法,对有关居间人如实告知义务的法律规范、司法案例进行横向、纵向的比较分析,剖析现有居间人如实告知义务的制度现状及履行现状。第四部分:居间人如实告知义务制度架构。笔者运用解释学原理,从划定如实告知内容的标准、归纳如实告知的信息类型、界定居间人如实告知程度以及履行如实告知义务的方式四个角度丰富现有制度架构。第五部分:违反如实告知义务的责任。笔者为更加完整地阐述房屋买卖居间人的如实告知义务制度,对违反如实告知义务的责任进行分析,从违反如实告知义务的责任样态、责任性质、责任分配以及免责事由四个层面剖析房屋买卖居间人的责任制度。着重对房屋买卖居间人未履行如实告知义务承担的损害赔偿责任的性质及其在居间人与相对人之间的分配进行分析并得出结论:损害赔偿责任宜在违约责任的框架内解决,在责任分配时应当严格遵守"合同相对性原则"。
[Abstract]:The obligation to inform truthfully is of great significance in the intermediary system. It is an important legal means to correct the asymmetry of information, and it is also the basic requirement of the principle of good faith for the intermediary to fulfill his contractual obligations. With the rapid development of the real estate market, The disputes caused by the intermediary's failure to fulfill the obligation to inform truthfully are increasing. In addition, the judicial practice circles have regard to the standard of truth-telling content and the type of information truthfully informed. Views differ as to whether the intermediary should have the obligation to investigate and verify and whether the intermediary should bear civil liability. As a result, the current legal system is difficult to regulate social life. Civil and commercial law scholars pay more attention to the truthful duty of informing the insured and the insured in the Insurance Law. However, there is little interest in the truth-telling obligation of the intermediary. This paper uses the empirical research method and the case analysis method to study the standard of the truthful disclosure obligation of the broker, and the degree to which the truthful informing obligation is fulfilled. From the perspectives of law, law and economics, law hermeneutics, and so on, to perfect the system of truthful disclosure obligation of housing intermediary, in order to reveal the true connotation of Article 425 of contract Law on the realistic level, this paper analyzes the three levels of responsibility of violating the obligation to inform truthfully, from the perspective of law, law and hermeneutics. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts: the first part: the definition of relevant concepts. Based on judicial practice, the author clearly defines the concept and classification of housing buyers and sellers. The concept and nature of the truthful disclosure obligation of a housing intermediary, and the delineation of the scope of the study in this article, shall be restricted to those who provide real estate information and intermediary business to the trustor, and who have the main nature of being a legal person or an unincorporated organization, The second part: the necessity of establishing the truthful disclosure obligation of the intermediary. From the angle of economics and law, the author reveals the factual basis and the legal basis of the intermediary's truthful obligation to inform. And through the construction of intermediary game model to reveal the role of truthful disclosure obligation to overcome market failure and highlight the legal status of truthful disclosure obligations. Part three: the analysis of the present situation of truthful disclosure obligations of intermediaries. The author adopts the empirical analysis method. To carry on horizontal and vertical comparative analysis of the legal norms and judicial cases concerning the truth-telling obligation of the intermediary, Part 4th: the framework of the system of truthful disclosure of the intermediary. The author applies the principle of hermeneutics to define the standard of the content of truthful notification. To summarize the types of information that are truthfully communicated, Defining the extent of truthful notification and the way to fulfill the obligation of truthful notification enrich the existing institutional framework. Part 5th: responsibility for violating the obligation of truthful informing. The obligation of truthful notification of a person, Analyzing the responsibility of violating the obligation to inform truthfully, from the pattern of responsibility of violating the obligation to inform truthfully, the nature of the responsibility, This paper analyzes the liability system of housing buyers and sellers from four aspects of responsibility distribution and exemption. Focusing on the nature of the liability for damages that the broker fails to fulfill the obligation of informing truthfully and the nature of the liability of the intermediary and the relative party. And concludes that liability for damage should be resolved within the framework of liability for breach of contract, The principle of relativity of contract should be strictly observed in the distribution of responsibility.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.284

【相似文献】