我国房地产业政策存在问题及原因

发布时间：2018-11-07 18:13

【摘要】：当前,我国房地产业政策存在问题较多,具体包括:房地产业政策环境缺乏引导作用,不利于制度建设,不利于政策执行和监督。房地产业政策目标单一,有些地方片面追求GDP增长,甚至导致目标偏向。房地产业政策实施手段单一,片面追求行政手段的效应,却忽视了市场手段的作用;过分强调经济手段,却忽视了行政手段。房地产业政策价值取向混乱,过分强调加快房地产业发展,片面强调住房的商品属性,却忽略了房地产作为住宅的基本生活保障属性;片面强调房地产业是国民经济支柱产业,却忽略了房地产业的社会保障性质;片面强调坚持土地公有制,却忽略了与市场机制相结合;强调运用市场机制引导产业发展,却产生了土地私有化的观点。房地产业政策执行力匮乏,政策自身不完善,政策执行有偏差,政策执行对象参与不积极,政策执行方式不配套,政策执行监控不力。房地产业政策政府管制过多,廉租住房、经济适用住房建设问题很多,住房保障体系对象过于宽泛,保障重点不突出,住宅私有率攀高,导致"房奴"大量涌现。
[Abstract]:At present, there are many problems in China's real estate policy, including: the lack of guidance role of the real estate policy environment, is not conducive to the construction of the system, is not conducive to policy implementation and supervision. Real estate policy goal is single, some places one-sided pursue GDP growth, even causes the goal bias. The implementation means of real estate policy are single, the one-sided pursuit of the effect of administrative means, but ignore the role of market means, too much emphasis on economic means, but neglect of administrative means. The policy value orientation of the real estate industry is confused, with excessive emphasis on speeding up the development of the real estate industry, and one-sided emphasis on the commodity attribute of the housing, while ignoring the property of the real estate as the basic living security property of the residence; It emphasizes that the real estate industry is the pillar industry of the national economy, but neglects the social security nature of the real estate industry, insists on the public ownership of the land, but neglects the combination of the market mechanism and the public ownership of the land. Emphasis on the use of market mechanisms to guide industrial development, but the point of view of land privatization. The real estate policy execution power is short, the policy itself is not perfect, the policy implementation has deviation, the policy implementation object participation is not active, the policy implementation way is not matched, the policy implementation monitoring is not effective. The real estate policy government controls too much, the low rent housing, the economical suitable housing construction question is many, the housing security system object is too broad, the safeguard key point is not prominent, the housing private rate climbs up, causes the "house slave" to emerge in large numbers.
【作者单位】：北京交通大学经济管理学院;
【分类号】：F299.23

【共引文献】