中国电信业规制政策与效率分析

发布时间：2018-04-28 23:10

本文选题：电信效率 + 接入定价　；参考：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：电信业作为关系国计民生的支柱产业,发挥着越来越重要的作用。从1994年中国联通的成立,到1998年对邮电拆分,组建信息产业部,经过不断的拆分、整合、重组,形成包括中国移动,中国联通,中国电信,中国网通,中国铁通及中国卫通的“5+1”竞争模式,再到2008年的“六合三”改革,我国电信业基本形成了中国移动、中国电信、中国联通三大运营商“三足鼎立”的竞争局面。改革的目的是明确的,就是要“打破垄断,促进竞争”,形成有效的市场竞争体系,实现电信业的高效率。然而,伴随着电信业市场化的改革,行业的效率真的提高了吗?电信业的拆分、重组真的提高了消费者的福利了吗?政府应该完全放开还是应该继续管制?应该采取怎样的规制方法?因此,对电信业效率问题及规制政策研究等一系列问题是一个具有理论意思和现实意思的课题,值得深入思考。本文分为五章。第一章是导论。本章包括问题的提出及研究意义,相关的文献综述,论文的行文思路、基本框架及研究方法,创新点和不足。第二章是中国电信业改革发展历程及绩效分析。本章分为两小节,分别从电信改革产业结构和绩效两方面进行论述,通过研究我国电信产业体制改革、运营模式改革、竞争模式改革、价格模式改革及绩效影响等方面的变化,反映我国电信产业规制的效果以及对电信产业的影响,为下面电信业效率的研究、非对称管制政策的实施做铺垫。第三章是中国电信业绩效分析——效率测评及影响因素分析。本章以2005-2009年全国31个省市的电信运营数据为样本,用DEA法分别对各省市各年份进行效率值的测算,随后引入可能影响效率值的多种因素,通过分析价格上限规制和结构重组因素等规制政策对效率的影响,得出相关结论。同时,引入非对称管制的概念,为政府的管制方向和管制重点提供思路。第四章是中国电信业非对称管制分析——以互联互通资费管制为例。本章在前面几章的基础上,从管制者的角度审视,寻求提升中国电信业效率、促进行业竞争的方法和途径,属于电信业规制政策研究内容。非对称管制很重要的一部分内容是接入定价问题,通过对这一问题进行理论上的分析,借鉴国际上目前的主流接入方法,结合我国实际,得出我国应采用长期增量成本法。第五章是本文结论和政策建议。本章是对前面四章内容的总结和提炼,在此基础上提出中国电信业改革发展的政策建议。随着市场化改革的不断推进,电信业总体效率是不断提高的,政府应加大规制力度,不断完善监管体系,实施非对称管制,多角度多层次对电信行业进行改革,真正逐步实现行业的跨越式发展。
[Abstract]:Telecommunications industry, as a pillar industry related to the national economy and people's livelihood, is playing a more and more important role. From the establishment of China Unicom in 1994 to the separation of posts and telecommunications in 1998 and the establishment of the Ministry of Information Industry, through continuous separation, integration, reorganization, including China Mobile, China Unicom, China Telecom, China Netcom, By the "51" competition model of China Railway and China Satellite Communications, and by the reform of "Liuhe three" in 2008, the competition situation of three major operators of China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom has been basically formed in China Telecom Industry. The aim of the reform is to "break the monopoly, promote competition", form an effective market competition system and realize the high efficiency of the telecommunication industry. However, with the reform of telecommunications market, has the efficiency of the industry really improved? Has the separation and restructuring of the telecommunications industry really increased consumer welfare? Should the government be completely liberalized or should it continue to regulate? What kind of regulation methods should be adopted? Therefore, a series of problems, such as the efficiency of telecommunication industry and the study of regulatory policy, are a subject of theoretical and practical significance, which is worth further thinking. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is an introduction. This chapter includes the question raising and research significance, the related literature review, the article writing thought, the basic frame and the research method, the innovation point and the insufficiency. The second chapter is the development course and performance analysis of China's telecom industry reform. This chapter is divided into two sections, respectively from the telecommunications reform industry structure and performance two aspects of the discussion, through the study of China's telecommunications industry system reform, business model reform, competition model reform, price model reform and performance impact, and so on. It reflects the effect of the regulation of China's telecom industry and its influence on the telecommunication industry. It paves the way for the following research on the efficiency of telecom industry and the implementation of asymmetric regulation policy. The third chapter is the performance analysis of Chinese telecom industry-efficiency evaluation and analysis of influencing factors. This chapter takes the data of telecommunication operation of 31 provinces and cities in China from 2005 to 2009 as a sample, calculates the efficiency value of each province and city by using DEA method, and then introduces many factors that may affect the efficiency value. By analyzing the effect of price cap regulation and structural restructuring on efficiency, the relevant conclusions are drawn. At the same time, the concept of asymmetric regulation is introduced to provide ideas for the direction and focus of government regulation. Chapter four is the analysis of asymmetric regulation of China telecom industry-taking interconnection tariff regulation as an example. Based on the previous chapters, this chapter looks at the ways and means of promoting the efficiency and competition of China's telecom industry from the perspective of regulators, which belongs to the research content of regulation policy of telecom industry. Asymmetric regulation is an important part of the access pricing problem. Through the theoretical analysis of this problem, drawing lessons from the current mainstream international access methods, combined with the reality of our country, it is concluded that long-term incremental cost method should be adopted in our country. The fifth chapter is the conclusion of this paper and policy recommendations. This chapter summarizes and refines the contents of the previous four chapters, and then puts forward some policy suggestions for the reform and development of China's telecommunications industry. With the continuous promotion of market-oriented reform, the overall efficiency of the telecommunications industry is constantly improving. The government should strengthen regulation, constantly improve the regulatory system, implement asymmetric regulation, and carry out multi-angle and multi-level reform of the telecommunications industry. Truly realize the leapfrog development of the industry step by step.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：F626

【参考文献】